User talk:Tuppenceworth

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tuppenceworth! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just. Delete. The. Article. Tuppenceworth (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Tuppenceworth. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Steven Elder, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 15:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so delete the article Tuppenceworth (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Elder for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Elder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Elder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 13:51, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the page from Wikipedia Tuppenceworth (talk) 16:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Jauerback. I noticed that you recently removed content from Steven Elder without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Steven Elder, you may be blocked from editing. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the page from wikipedia Tuppenceworth (talk) 16:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia we do not delete articles by request, but by discussion and consensus. The article has been nominated for deletion, now a discussion will occur among editors who will give their opinion as to why, according to Wikipedia's criteria for notability (particularly WP:NACTOR), the article should be kept or deleted. This discussion will be open for 7 days, after which an administrator will review the comments and decide the outcome. You are welcome to participate in that discussion, if you would like to present an argument as to why the article should be deleted. If you are going to participate, you are expected to argue based on Wikipedia policy; administrators will disregard comments that ask for deletion without explaining why. You can read more on this process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.

You are welcome to participate, but simply continuing to demand deletion by posting on other pages is disruptive, and if you do not stop you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

no thanks, I await the outcome with bated breath. You have offended a living person, I think that's good enough reason to take the article down. Tuppenceworth (talk) 17:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's often far too easy to offend a living person, especially if they assume Wikipedia is like social media and they have control over what content is posted. The main difference between this case and a lot of the other cases I see where a subject (or someone working for them) demands the Wikipedia article on them be removed is that sources really don't exist to support an article on Elder at the moment, meaning the likelihood of some other editor being able to just create the article anew with the same sources and it being able to stick is zero in at least the immediate and near future. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]