User talk:Tuttoaposto21

May 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to I Am Charlotte Simmons have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Charlotte Simmons, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored. And making legal threats which your recent edits on User talk:Oshwah come very close to will get you blocked. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

pornography

Saw your post on Oshwah's talk. Please see Wikipedia:Content disclaimer and Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored as well as Wikipedia:Offensive material. This is not a new concern, but you could discuss the matter anyway. As to the particular image on the particular page, it would be best to bring the matter for discussion on the article's talk page and seek consensus there before removing the image again. You might want to raise your concerns at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Also, WP:AN might be a good place for a more immediate response. Please bear in mind that the quasi legal arguments you've raised will not get you anywhere.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wait I thought this was about an image. YOu objected to a link? Sorry, but your characterization of the act is a matter of personal opinion. So, please do not do that again. We tend to speak plainly in articles and not inject our personal qualms. Please follow Oshwah's advice as it was spot on--Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I see the image. Back to my first paragraph, as it probably passes muster on Wikipedia:Offensive material. You can still discuss in appropriate venues.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:08, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]