Jump to content

User talk:UniBrill01

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, UniBrill01, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to O'Neill dynasty seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biafra Government in Exile (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:COI. Very far from approval. WP:External links would also need to be removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, UniBrill01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Draft:Biafra Republic Government in Exile, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 00:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Simon Ekpa, you may be blocked from editing. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Simon Ekpa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 21:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello UniBrill01! Your additions to Draft:Biafra Republic Government in Exile have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
UniBrill01 (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have just resubmitted my article page for review. Thanks

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! UniBrill01, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 00:12, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Prime Minister Simon Ekpa[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Prime Minister Simon Ekpa. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Simon Ekpa. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Simon Ekpa. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biafra Republic Government in Exile moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Biafra Republic Government in Exile. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no categories and no structure. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, UniBrill01. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Draft:Biafra Republic Government in Exile.
Stop creating multiple versions of the same draft and moving them out of draftspace when they are not ready. Your contributions are becoming disruptive and tendentious and continuation will result in blocking. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 10:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Despite the above, it seems you have again moved a draft to mainspace when it is far from ready. Moving an item to draft is done to give time for it to be brought up to standard and more importantly for it to be submitted for review. The item is not in a condition for it to be published to the encyclopedia and it may very well be proposed or deletion. Eagleash (talk) 22:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Biafra Republic Government in Exile for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biafra Republic Government in Exile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biafra Republic Government in Exile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eagleash (talk) 22:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biafra republic Government-in-Exile (May 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:04, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|l was blocked on the issue of disruptive editing=I appeal to be unlocked because I only created a redirect which led to an administrator blocking me. Please review}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UniBrill01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. You had two. See WP:GAB to understand how to craft an unblock request. You were not blocked because of a single edit but rather, an significant history of inappropriate edits. Yamla (talk) 18:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please, kindly unblock me. I only added a redirect to Biafra Republic Government in Exile. I'm the content Creator UniBrill (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UniBrill01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge the reason I was blocked

Decline reason:

You have to be more specific than that. And given everything that led to this, I think you should seriously reconsider your efforts to get unblocked, as you may not be up to this. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm appealing to be unlocked. I was blocked by an administrator for disruptive editing. I'm unaware of the mistake. UniBrill (talk) 20:18, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal for an unblock on User:UniBrill01[edit]

Hello Sir/Mar


{{unblock|1=I was blocked by an Administrator User:Bbb23 but I appeal for an unblock. I now know the reason l was blocked as was stated by User: Bbb23 that l engaged on disruptive editing but it's still unclear as l only added redirect to Biafra Republic Government in Exile Article. Please review the block and consider an unblock~~~~}} UniBrill (talk) 21:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UniBrill01. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 10:06, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UniBrill01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

l am humbly appealing to be unblocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm so sorry for violating Wikipedia's policy on Disruptive editingUniBrill (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your violations of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. Frankly, you are much closer to a community ban than you are to being unblocked. Yamla (talk) 09:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello revered Administrators,


I'm am writing to appeal for an unblock on my user account. I was blocked for disruptive editing. It was unconscious and gross error at the same time to behold! I humbly appeal for a second chance to be given to me. I'm deeply sorry for violating the rules here and l vow never to let it happen again. I aspire to be a respected contributor on Wikipedia as l get more acquainted with editing Wikipedia.

Thanks as you review my heartfelt request UniBrill (talk) 20:41, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UniBrill01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for evading. I used my other user account @UniBrill after l was blocked for disruptive editing. I was never aware of the implications but l now realize with regrets deep down inside me it's gross offense, now I know better. I humbly appeal for a second chance to be given to me to make changes and continue to adapt Wikipedia rules and principles. I aspire to be a respected contributor on Wikipedia as l get more acquainted with editing Wikipedia.UniBrill (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The things you say are correct: you were blocked for disruptive editing, you are now (also) blocked for socking, and your access to this talk page is revoked, since all of these meaningless requests are just taking up too much valuable time. Drmies (talk) 17:25, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked for evading! Iwas blocked for abusive use of my account. I used @UniBrill to edit. I have appealed several times and I have have received warning that l will be permanently blocked from editing my talk page. I look forward to your favorable review of my heartfelt request. UniBrill (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #73122[edit]

is closed. Noted checkuser block. Directed user to request unblock at original account talk page. User talk:UniBrill -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Biafra republic Government-in-Exile[edit]

Information icon Hello, UniBrill01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Biafra republic Government-in-Exile, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Biafra republic Government-in-Exile[edit]

Hello, UniBrill01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Biafra republic Government-in-Exile".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UniBrill01&oldid=1190670715"