User talk:Unswaccomeditor

Hello, Unswaccomeditor, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 23:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

November 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to UNSW Residential Communities because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist I just added links as reference, not sure why this was not accepted? Unswaccomeditor (talk) 01:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Unswaccomeditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kylie not sure how the article does not qualify as we have other pages with similar content which was accepted. Could you please clarify? Also this page initially existed but was somehow deleted am I able to reinstate the page instead? Unswaccomeditor (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic Unswaccomeditor (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article is NOT deleted (I'm looking at it, at Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales), and other articles that are in main space have, I assume, reliable secondary sources that prove their notability. Your has a web page and another web page. Drmies (talk) 01:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unswaccomeditor, as Drmies said the page is not deleted and is even linked in the header of this section. The Other Stuff Exists argument is rarely helpful as any existing articles either up to standard or if not need to either be improved or deleted not be used as an argument to add more. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). When I reviewed Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales it had zero independent sources at all. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic I've included an article from SBS which features Fig Tree Hall, is this not a reliable enough source? Does reference need to be from a published book? Unswaccomeditor (talk) 04:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not aware of Special Broadcasting Service but as a public service broadcaster I would guess they would definitely be considered a reliable source. No references do not have to be in published books. However if you mean this it is just a passing mention in the text. Although sources do not have to be in English if the Urdu audio does talk about them in more depth it's impossible for most reviewers to assess, but the content suggests it is just related to the single issue (pre-dawn meal during Ramadan). KylieTastic (talk) 09:53, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales (November 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

With the exception of the suhur article, all the sources cited are close primary ones, which do not establish notability. We need to see significant coverage, directly of the subject, in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. My guess is that such source are not likely to be available, which is typically the case with halls of residence, as well as individual faculties/departments/schools and other individual units of universities.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Unswaccomeditor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Philip Baxter College, University of New South Wales, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]