User talk:UsmanullahPK

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for improper page moves without consensus and failure to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dianna (talk) 01:26, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsmanullahPK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry if I hurt but not want to hurt,plz unblock my ID

Decline reason:

There's no sign that editor understands the nature of the problems he has caused or the warnings he has received.—Kww(talk) 04:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

UsmanullahPK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

46.230.113.134 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "UsmanullahPK". The reason given for UsmanullahPK's block is: "Disruptive editing: Improper page moves. Changing block to inde

Blocking administrator: Diannaa (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Max Semenik (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me. My friend used my computer and pretended to be me. I won't let this happen again.

Hello UsmanullahPK. Please place new posts at the bottom of the page. It's unlikely that anyone will believe that someone else pretended to be you. It's an excuse that's ben tried so often that we have a humourous essay about it: Wikipedia:My little brother did it. You are the person who is responsible for all the edits from your account. You will not be unblocked until you demonstrate that you understand what you did wrong and show us that you have the English language skills and maturity to work here. Also, please note you are required to leave up your active declined unblock requests. Thanks. -- Dianna (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsmanullahPK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I know what I did wrong so please Unblock me,If I hurt anyone or thier believe so I am very sorry.And I am the student of History and comparative religions and know english language

Decline reason:

As you have admitted that this account is compromised it cannot be unblocked. We cannot now know if we are addressing the originator of the account.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

UsmanullahPK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. my brother used my account so please Unblock me,If I hurt anyone or thier believe in Inadvertently so I am very sorry. 16:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Repeated unblock requests containing obvious lies and extremely poor English won't be effective. I'm removing your talk-page access to due to your constant removal of denied unblocks. The fact that you keep doing so when you have been told repeatedly not to is further evidence that you don't have sufficient English language skills to edit here effectively.—Kww(talk) 19:19, 23 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of अ़[edit]

Hello UsmanullahPK,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged अ़ for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, 069952497a^{Comments and complaints}_{Stuff I've done} 00:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sahabah[edit]

Template:Sahabah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Afkari for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afkari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afkari until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 16:10, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:People of Pakhtunkhwa[edit]

Template:People of Pakhtunkhwa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 23:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Islam and other religions[edit]

Template:Islam and other religions has been nominated for merging with Template:Islam topics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]