User talk:Vishalinfidigit

Request to unblock my account[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalinfidigit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

{{Checkuser needed}}:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

Heartily Apologize for any of my edits which went incorrect. I would like to contribute to Wikipedia & this was just a start.
I have already started reading all the policies & promise you all in future that I won't do anything incorrect which leads you all in trouble again.

Sorry for my mistakes.

Kindly look into my profile & lift this penalty so that I can contribute more. I will start with small English etiquette. Will try to bring more citation resources to make many of the pages rich with knowledge base.

Please unblock my account & I will deactivate other accounts which are connected to this IP Address & use single account.

Help Required for deleting/removing other accounts.

Vishalinfidigit (talk) 06:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Before anything else can happen, you must disclose any paid editing that you have performed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:54, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks NinjaRobotPirate, however, it is monthly SEO Activity which we do & trying to create Wikipedia Page as per guidelines, I know it got rejected because of promotional content, which we are working on to make it neutral with Notability. Regarding amount, that is management & agreement which knows better :( I don't know so it is difficult for me to provide it to you. --Vishalinfidigit (talk) 12:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[[[User:Vishalinfidigit|Vishalinfidigit]] (talk) 12:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)][reply]

User:Vishgohel: Difference between revisions[edit]

I received email, is my block lifted?

User:Vishgohel: Difference between revisions
Latest revision as of 06:57, 21 December 2018 (edit)
Athaenara (talk | contribs)
(→‎Sockpuppet: Template:Sockpuppet, User:Vishalinfidigit)

@Athaenara:, @NinjaRobotPirate:, @JamesBWatson:, @Bbb23: - Can you please let me know whether I will be able to edit or not?

Vishalinfidigit (talk) 11:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I very much doubt in, considering that you are clearly here to use Wikiepdia as a marketing medium. (You even openly admit that you are here for "SEO".) Also, you do not help your case by such things as claiming that you have "no connection" to Vishgohel, despite the fact that you are both working for the same company. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship to Vishgohel? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No Connection Vishalinfidigit (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalinfidigit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear All, I am seeking for lifting the BAN from my account & promise to adhere all my contributions with the guidelines of Wikipedia. Looking for a positive response soon.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 15:15, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request - Admitting mistakes & want to contribute more as per the Guidelines (promise)[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalinfidigit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Accepting the usage of my account as SOCKPUPPETS

* Understand what you did and why you have been blocked - Yes, I have done things which were not aligned as per guidelines. I was wrong & want to make it right.

From Yamla

* To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, - Now, this block is not necessary as I have read lots of articles & will do a fresh start

* the block is no longer necessary because you # understand what you have been blocked for - Admitting it & promise to be constructive with obeying Wikipedia Guidelines # will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and - Read lots of articles & rules. This will not happen in future for sure # will make useful contributions instead - Definitely, will make sure for positive & useful contributions with Table Coding, Citations & Entertainment Domain to start with.

Apologize again & looking to work towards more contributions (Constructive & Positive). Question - Can I create Zivame Company Page through Articles for Creation (AFC) process? Vishalinfidigit (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Pick an account. You have posted a virtually identical appeal as User:Vishgohel (that account which you openly lied about last year, remember?) Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Kindly unlock Vishgohel Profile as I will be using only one profile going forward.

Vishalinfidigit (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly unlock this profile as it is parent Sockpuppet profile.
Vishalinfidigit (talk) 14:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]