Jump to content

User talk:WEELOO77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, WEELOO77! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

October 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Machu Picchu has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Machu Picchu was changed by WEELOO77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909038 on 2015-10-19T00:04:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article you appear to be collaborating on, Harry Wilison-Wobson has been marked for deletion as an apparent hoax. Please follow the instructions given on the notice at the top of that page -- The Anome (talk) 10:12, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bobert Arvey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Everymorning (talk) 00:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-block appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WEELOO77 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My IP address has been blocked in the past due to vandalism. I have not vandalised, just fixed up some pages that had pages issues. They did seem a bit unrealistic though. I also believe that someone used my account to create pages. Thank you for listening.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment If you believe your account to be compromised, then per policy this account will not be unblocked as there is no way to be certain that the original account holder is in control. Blackmane (talk) 01:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New anti-block appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WEELOO77 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have just been told by one of my close friends that it was him who was making the "troll"-like pages! He apparently used my computer while I was elsewhere. Next time, I'll log out. Can you please unblock me whoever has the powers to do so? Thanks very much. Just been reading the 'appealing a block' page. Does "that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for" and "that your conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block" mean that I can be unblocked soon? Thanks.

Decline reason:

Sorry, no. This account is compromised; we have no idea who is using it now. This is explained above. Kuru (talk) 11:39, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletion of my account[edit]

@I dream of horses: Hello, I was just wondering if my account can be deleted, as it is pointless if I am blocked. Thanks very much. WEELOO77 (talk) 06:45, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is no way to delete accounts, but you can just abandon this account, start a new one, make sure that you have a strong password and take care that no-one else has access to your account. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]