User talk:WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW

Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify them!

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! echidnaLives - talk - edits 23:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

False Block[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked as a sockpuppet. I have not been making bad faith contributions and have not voted in anything. Could I please have further explaination to why I have been blocked as a sockpuppet? I would like to add that I do frequently edit on public wifi which could have confused me with the sockpuppeteer who lives in the same county as me. Please take the time to review my edit history and confirm that I have not made bad faith edits to articles related to this incident. Thank you for taking the time to review my request.
WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (talk) (contributions) 01:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given this username, I don't buy your claims for a second. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked as a sockpuppet. I do frequently edit on public wifi. I have been making good faith contributions to Wikipedia. Like this draft I was working on before i got blocked. If I am declined again can I please have some examples of what I have done wrong. Can you please take a legitimate look at my contributions before judging me based off my username.
Thank you, for taking the time to review my request. WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (talk) (contributions) 22:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This seems unlikely considering your shared interests with the blocked users and the fact that you clearly had experience on Wikipedia prior to creating this account. I suggest taking 6 months off of editing the English Wikipedia, coming clean about any other accounts you have used, and applying for the standard offer under your original account. You can edit other Wikimedia projects in the meantime, which will help to show that you're able to contribute constructively. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 00:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (talk) (contributions) 22:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'm probably just gonna quit editing Wikipedia. I have no other accounts and just read a lot of policies before I started editing. I have zero chance of convincing anyone of that though so I'm just gonna quit. I might try to appeal in 6 months but I doubt it'll work as I don't own the account that's I've been blocked for being a sock puppet of so there's zero chance I can appeal out of this.
WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (talk) (contributions) 01:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I was blocked for sockpuppetry a little over a month ago and i have taken a break in order to research the user I was blocked because of. The first thing I noticed was their unblock requests. If you look at their socks unblock requests (like this one) they all start off very angry with "This is outrageous" and calling it a violation of wikipedia policies. My unblock requests have been civil from the start. The second thing i noticed well looking at their accounts is that this user has already said I'm not them. On the talk page of their sock User:DHSchool2003Student they have said I am not a sock Linked here. I know their word doesn't mean much as they have already proven themselves a liar but Eliadon and I are the only people who 100 percent know that I am not a sock. The 3rd thing I have noticed is more subtle but I think is worth mentioning. Every single one of the talk pages on their sock accounts along with their main account has the {{User new message large}} template at the top of their talk page which I do not have. The final thing I will point out is my editing history has only one or two edits relating to loudoun county which looks like the topic this user was banned for in the first place. Here are the links to all of their accounts
User:Ellidon217 (sockpuppeteer)
User:DHSchool2003Student
User:BE172-08
User:Bog7000
User:Breellis178
I would like to resume editing wikipedia normally but I understand if you keep the block.
Thank you for your time
WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (talk) (contributions) 22:11, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. Maybe someone else will, but I don't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

quick fix[edit]

the wikilink Arc Alchemist series redirects to an intel list instead of the Intel Arc article. could whoever reviews my block please fix that if i dont get unblocked. you should probably also make the redirect Intel arc go the intel arc article.

Thanks WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW (talk) (contributions) 03:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Little Schuylkill Railroad[edit]

Hello, WP-POLICYIDIDNTKNOW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Little Schuylkill Railroad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]