Jump to content

User talk:WSS Regt Historian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, I moved this article to Horace Dimick, consistent with Wikipedia's naming guidelines. If you have any questions please ask me on my talk page.--PinkBull 18:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, WSS Regt Historian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 01:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous
You may also find this guide on Civil War editing & this list of ACW sources handy. There is also a group of editors, American Civil War task force, a subgroup of military history editors, which may be a good place for questions. Enjoy,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 02:06, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

uploading images

[edit]

Answering your request on your userpage. Images are uploaded at the Commons. I have a gallery there that you may like.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 02:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, WSS Regt Historian. You have new messages at Berean Hunter's talk page.
Message added 03:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:26, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to ACW regimental articles

[edit]

Good morning. Please take a few minutes to read the WP:MOSICON policy. Modern or post-war state flags were deemed inappropriate by American Civil War task force well over a year ago. When images of the units' flags are available (from any point during the war), then those images are used.

Additionally, please do not change unit numerical designations within articles (ex: "2nd" to "Second"). User Hal Jesperson has created very helpful guides to editing ACW articles for consistency: User:Hlj/CWediting and User:Hlj/CWbibliography.

We've got an active sub-group of military history editors working on ACW articles. If you have questions, feel free to drop by the American Civil War task force. Folks will help you.

Many thanks. Spacini (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Missouri Volunteer Cavalry

[edit]

Re: User:WSS Regt Historian/2nd Missouri Volunteer Cavalry

Hi, can we get this moved into mainspace, so that it can be audited for WP:MILHIST's ACW cleanup of all articles using Dyer's Compendium of the War of the Rebellion. If you're interested in such Civil War articles, there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#ACW regimental articles regarding proposals and what we're doing, as there are ~540 such articles really need sorting out and developing. This 2nd Missouri page should be included though, as it does not appear to have been updated since April 2011, might as well move it so that we don't neglect it. Cheers, Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 05:23, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 7th Missouri Volunteer Infantry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Celtic and Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 1st Missouri Infantry (Confederate), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Madrid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shadowjams (talk) 08:36, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Deletion of 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry

[edit]

Response from WSS Regt Historian: Re: Deletion of 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry. It is unclear what material was copyrighted, as almost all the material in the WIKI page came from "Dyer's Compendium" a text out of copyright. I am unable to evaluate potential violation, as the page is already deleted. It is possible that an external link to a page related to the 21st Missouri ( http://mo21infantry.tripod.com/21inf.html ) was perceived as a source of text, rather than an associated link.--WSS Regt Historian (talk) 13:55, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-Up. The alleged "copyrighted material" at http://www.wellsclan.us/History/generatn/21regmnt.htm was not material created by that website, but was an extract from Dyer, Frederick H. A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion (Des Moines, IA: Dyer Pub. Co.), 1908. "Dyer's" is a text in the public domain, and is used as a (or the) source document for most of the Wikipedia entries for Union regiments from the American Civil War. My article in Wikipedia used an extract from "Dyer's", as did the author of the page at the wellsclan.us website (working separately). The wellsclan.us website in question states that the information page is an extract from "Dyer's", as was the deleted page on the 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry. There were NO plagiarism, and NO copyright infringement, they were created separately extracting the same document which is now in the public domain. Please reinstate the deleted Wiki page for the 21st Missouri Volunteer Infantry.--WSS Regt Historian (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

11th Missouri Volunteer Infantry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Young's Point
1st Regiment Missouri Volunteer Engineers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to March to the Sea
3rd Missouri Volunteer Infantry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Battle of Canton
4th Missouri Volunteer Infantry (3 months, 1861) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fulton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Autopatrolled

[edit]

I see you have created a substantial number of new articles on the American Civil War, but you are still appearing on the Special:Newpages list. I suggest that you consider requesting the Autopatrolled permission. See Wikipedia:Autopatrolled for details. --DThomsen8 (talk) 23:20, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 31st Missouri Volunteer Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Canton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 12th Missouri Volunteer Infantry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chatahoochee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2nd Missouri Volunteer Cavalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, WSS Regt Historian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marshall, Missouri, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, WSS Regt Historian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]