User talk:WalltoWallFloorboards

Use this page to leave me any messages. Please remember to sign your message using (~~~~) so I know that the message is from you. WalltoWallFloorboards (talk) 23:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WalltoWallFloorboards, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi WalltoWallFloorboards! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WalltoWallFloorboards (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure why I am being accused of abusing multiple accounts when this is my only account that I created a few days ago, what am I supposed to have done wrong when all I am here to do is to edit my favourite articles WalltoWallFloorboards (talk) 10:49, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Continuing to sock and lying repeatedly is not helping your prospects for the standard offer OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WalltoWallFloorboards (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not socking and I am not lying this is my one and only account I have never had more than one account WalltoWallFloorboards (talk) 22:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Anarchyte (talk | work) 12:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WalltoWallFloorboards (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not been sockpuppeting as this is my only account I have only ever had and only ever will use one account and my account was blocked without any proof of me doing something wrong plus on my user page the user has stated I am a suspected sockppuppet and nothing has been confirmed I would like to be unblocked so I can continue to help improving this wiki WalltoWallFloorboards (talk) 13:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Ah! If only you knew what giveaway signs in your editing make the connections to your other accounts glaringly obvious to anyone ho knows what to look for! The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WalltoWallFloorboards (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I haven't got any other accounts to have a connection with this is my only one I am new relatively new to Wikipedia and have never had any other accounts there is no proof that I have done anything wrong WalltoWallFloorboards (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Repeated denial is not, I'm afraid, a sufficient reason to unblock you. You will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why your edits substantially resemble those of a known sockpuppeteer; your explanation needs to be more reasonable that the obvious conclusion that this account is a sockpuppet. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not a court of law, and as such, WP:DUCK is sufficient. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]