User talk:WaseemAbbaass

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WaseemAbbaass (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 103.167.158.69

Decline reason:

You are not blocked. Yamla (talk) 09:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File permission problem with File:Air Chief Marshal Farooq Feroze Khan.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Air Chief Marshal Farooq Feroze Khan.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 06:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asim Munir (general)[edit]

I have seen that you have added unverified claims that I had previously removed. Please either remove the unverified claims again, or provide reliable references for him and his brothers being hafiz, and their father being an Imam. Random YouTuber opinions are not reliable references! Rahman1212 (talk) 23:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reference by your statement otherwise that his father was not imam and is brother was not a Hafiz. WaseemAbbaass (talk) 08:33, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are a claimant of he and his brothers are Hafiz, and his father is Imam, so you should bring references. I am not claiming anything. I am just asking you to remove such claims for which there are no references. I will be forced to open a dispute with an administrator if it does not happen. Rahman1212 (talk) 23:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Chief of the Army Staff (Pakistan)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The statement "As the highest-ranking officer, it is the most powerful position in Pakistan surpassing the President and Prime Minister." The information is irrelevant. there is no fact behind the statements. WaseemAbbaass (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nadeem Anjum, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Mohammad Azam Azam moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Dr. Mohammad Azam Azam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 08:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Mohammad Azam Azam (November 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dr. Mohammad Azam Azam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WaseemAbbaass! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the photo of Mohammad Azam Azam[edit]

I see you've uploaded a photo and added it to Draft:Mohammad Azam Azam. Could you explain when you took this picture? At the least, we should know the date the picture was taken, if not the equipment you used. —C.Fred (talk) 17:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was taken on 12 June 2011 WaseemAbbaass (talk) 17:55, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Azam Azam has been accepted[edit]

Mohammad Azam Azam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 18:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Azam Azam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammad Azam Azam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tribune.com.pk/story/466896/transitions-progressive-pakhtun-intellectual-dies-at-71. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Azam Azam (November 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Azam Azam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 07:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, WaseemAbbaass. You have new messages at Talk:Asim Munir (general).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi, just to let you know, it’s been 36 hours since you last reverted my edit without any elaboration on what I did as vandalism, please continue the discussion I started on the talk page. VirtualVagabond (talk) 21:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There were no evidence/references to the additions you did to the profile. WaseemAbbaass (talk) 13:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes there was. See the edit history, if you still think there’s a problem, please use the talk page, instead of reverting my edit. Otherwise that COULD constitute as disruptive editing. Thanks. VirtualVagabond (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asim Munir's name[edit]

Hi, why do you keep changing his name? It's mentioned as "Syed Asim Munir Ahmed Shah" by ISPR and NDU articles as well.

https://www.ndu.edu.pk/afwc/pub/OPINION-Vol.1-No.2-Dec.pdf 90.213.16.173 (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to https://ispr.gov.pk/chief-of-army-staff for correct name WaseemAbbaass (talk) 15:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but that's only a shortened name. Other pages refer to him by his full name, which should be used in toggle first line of the article: https://www.ispr.gov.pk/press-release-detail.php?id=5339 90.213.16.173 (talk) 09:33, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Asim Munir (general), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eternal Shadow Talk 08:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Asim Munir (general), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Additionally, please make sure your edits maintain a neutral point of view. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:50, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Asim Munir (general), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing[edit]

Dear wikipedia editor, I noted that you have reverted my edits to the page Asim Munir with the comment, "Most of the references articles does not contain name of "Asim Munir" explicility, so therefore deleted.

This is not the first incidence and you have done it earlier too. Please note that I left a note for you in the talk section of Asim Munir in section January 2024 to clearly provide description of how each reference relates to Asim Munir by name and left this comments for you, "I have listed in detail in the talk section how the references relate to the article. Please provide authentic source and reason of removing this section. I am unaware of any Wikipedia policy that prevents adding public image section to individuals holding sensitive positions."

Please use the talk section to have a meaningful discussion before deleting the section Public image. I will revert the changes now and refer to the admin if the changes are reverted without any meaningful discussion.

Disambiguation link notification for January 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asim Munir (general), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partition. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Asim Munir (general), you may be blocked from editing. VirtualVagabond (talk) 07:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 06:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Asim Munir (general). Saqib (talk) 09:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WaseemAbbaass]]. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the proof that i am Sockpuppet, this is a mere allegation, i request to please release my account. WaseemAbbaass (talk) 09:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WaseemAbbaass. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]