User talk:Wasickta

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wasickta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 13:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wasickta, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Wasickta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Wasickta. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Chamith (talk) 02:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (August 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 13:33, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration[edit]

Hello, Wasickta. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 12:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop now[edit]

Hey friend, I know you're pissed off, but no need to "out" someone on Wikipedia. Alansohn has a million edits and several people dislike the guy, so posting his identity on here is a dumb idea. Just send an email to an admin. They can investigate without identifying the person. This is very nasty. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

which email address do I send it to? A simple Google search of his name woulda been enough to send up red flags. This is textbook conflict of interest and I am surprised he was able to edit so many articles(including writing biographies of his political opponents) without anyone else noticing. Jeez! Wasickta (talk) 23:34, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OUTING and follow the directions. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, oversight was contacted to remove your reports. Please do not post the information further on Wikipedia. Consider this your final warning not to attempt to out another editor (regardless if it was not your intention, outing is not acceptable on Wikipedia). Concerns such as this need to be dealt with off wiki to avoid violating the privacy policy. -- The Voidwalker ^Discuss 00:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First off, the user put his own FULL NAME and CITY on Wikipedia HIMSELF(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/718522781). I am not a detective or outing anyone!

In fact, if you typed his full name into google and type the word "banana" it shows me a meme that states what we are dealing with.

And NO, I did not create the meme either.Wasickta (talk) 01:12, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I gave this warning, besides the matter that it is not immediately visible who they are from their own statements on Wikipedia (aside from googling them), the only evidence that you gave to support your COIN case was the personal information. -- The Voidwalker ^Discuss 19:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Alansohn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stay off my talk page. Present your evidence elsewhere. Alansohn (talk) 03:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:Alansohn, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Keep your bullshit off my talk page. Alansohn (talk) 03:45, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is amazing how Adam Gussens article on Wikipedia has speedy deletion right before you run against him in an election to take his seat. Don't worry I will get the diffs too. Gotta go to bed now.Wasickta (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See below[edit]

By FP1 I meant the case at the top of the coin board as an example of how a good COI case is laid out. Only in death does duty end (talk) 14:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COIN case[edit]

Reverting the close was not appropriate. See Wikipedia:Closing_discussions#Challenging_a_closing. Jytdog (talk) 19:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The summary you gave in COIN, is that the conclusion? Wasickta (talk)

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 23:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]