User talk:WereSpielChequers/Archive 29

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:WereSpielChequers/Sandbox User:WereSpielChequers/Navigation User:WereSpielChequers User:WereSpielChequers/Barnstars User:WereSpielChequers/Content User:WereSpielChequers/Userboxes User:WereSpielChequers/Cribs User_Talk:WereSpielChequers User:WereSpielChequers/guestbook Special:Emailuser/WereSpielChequers User:WereSpielChequers/Templates User:WereSpielChequers/Glam  
  Home Bling Content Userboxen Editcount Talk Guestbook Email  



This is my archive for threads from 2017 that don't belong in my themed archives.


Happy New Year, WereSpielChequers!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Incoming!

(just in case the Wikipedia e-mail system is still playing up) - you have mail! :-) Mike1901 (talk) 16:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Email

I shot you an email. Thanks. Go Phightins! 06:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, WereSpielChequers!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Arb request

I'm at my word limit, so I cannot respond to you on the Arb request. The objectionable part of the edit you mention was not that change from 06 to 6, which was legitimate, but the removal of a blank line in the categories. A blank line in the cateories is not rendered and thus is an example of Bg19bot making an unnecessary cosmetic edit. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. So your objection is to people doing such minor cleanups at the same time as they do a meaningful edit? I thought consensus was long established that you could make such edits if at the same time you maka a non cosmetic change such as the 06 to 6 one. AWB for starters is designed on that basis, you can set it to automatically make such minor changes at the same as any meaningful edit you make. Why would you want to change such a policy? ϢereSpielChequers 05:38, 1 January 2017 (UTC)


You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Magioladitis.

Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Magioladitis/Evidence. Please add your evidence by January 17, 2017, which is when the evidence phase closes.

You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Magioladitis/Workshop.

For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration.

If you no longer wish to receive case notifications for this case you can remove yourself from the notifications list here.

For the Arbitration Committee, Amortias (T)(C) 22:52, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Accidental revert

Sorry, looks like I inadvertently pocket-reverted you on RFA. TDL (talk) 14:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

No problem, someone's already fixed it. Accidents will happen as the Dalek said getting off the dustbin. ϢereSpielChequers 14:33, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


Use of the butterfly on my userspace

Hello, it it possible that I use your butterfly on my userspace please? Wiki-Coffee Talk 21:31, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Sure, it isn't mine though, I copied the code from Panyd - hence the attribution in the edit summary. ϢereSpielChequers 21:36, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, I will be sure to attribute him. Wiki-Coffee Talk 21:43, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Awkward Her. Wiki-Coffee Talk 21:50, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

RfC on "No paid editing for Admins" at WT:COI

I've relisted an RfC that was run at WT:Admin in Sept. 2015. It is at Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#Concrete proposal 3 as there are a number of similar proposals going on at the same place. Better to keep them together. Smallbones(smalltalk) 04:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi guy - long long ago, and far fay away, you gave me reason to respect your opinion. I now need your independent opinion/assessment of this page. I fought hard to get the main images accepted under "fair use" and lost. So I pointed a gun at the artist's agent and he gave up copyright, (or else. Btw that's called "figurative language" where I come from - I don't actually own a gun). Now I'm being bitten by someone who criticizes my best ever article because it "sandwiches" text. I would be so very grateful if you would examine this article on a PC and then advize me on the subject of sandwiching. The article seems fine on my Galaxy 4, and I aint finished inputting text yet, (a considerable amount to follow), do I have to lose my excellently structured article so some frog spawn can read it through the end of a broken bottle?

Forgive my acrid humour - just tell me what I need to do to ward off the challange of "sandwiching". Sincerely - MarkDask 22:32, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

PS - I promise I will leave your name out of the argument - I just want advice MarkDask 22:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Markdask, good to hear from you. How big a fan are you of Donald Trump's tie? Especially the Stephen Colbert parody of it? If ties that you trip over become a thing, and some Texan introduces a skinny Trump tie, then your influences section might become something us PC users have to live with. Currently on my screen the tip of the tail, well below the images, looks like this:
who
through
plaster
and
straw
brings
her
poignant,
figurative
sculptures
to life.
It is
this
sense
of
bringing
life
and
resonance
to an
inanimate
sculpture
that I
try to
capture
in my
own
work
Maybe that would work if you could rephrase it as a series of haiku? If not, for usability I'd give that article some mini galleries. I'd also swap a couple of images round - there is a convention that images should look into the article not out of it. ϢereSpielChequers 23:06, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Loved the Trump/Colbert allusion - wasn't Colbert hysterically funny? I saw you popped by - hope you liked the changes. MarkDask 23:14, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)



You've got mail!

{{you've got mail}} AmaryllisGardener talk 03:03, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Welcome without policy links

Thank you for creating a welcome without policy links, I think it's a brilliant idea. Down with the alphabet soup! Bishonen | talk 14:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC).

Thanks, I tested it again a couple of weeks ago at a Women's day editathon in London, I think it could be more concise and would welcome any small bits of it that Bishzilla could tear off or flame away. ϢereSpielChequers 15:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Maybe Darwinbish should take a look (= a bite). Bishzilla's own welcome template is actually pretty conventional, with hrair links to information pages and the like. Bishonen | talk 15:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC).

Talkback

Hello, WereSpielChequers. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers#BACKLOG.
Message added 23:51, 31 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


a favor at Edison Bell

Would you be so kind as to give Edison Bell a once-over for British spelling. I can't even spell in American, so I'm most certainly not going to know how to truly spell things. I should have done this before it appeared at DYK. I was hoping one of the readers would catch things, but either I didn't use words with spelling variants, or nobody else caught them either. Many thanks! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, much appreciated. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:10, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
You are very welcome. If either the Bartholomew lane or Charing cross rd buildings survived the blitz they are probably still standing. If so we may have a photograph or could get one in the next few weeks if I ask at the London meetup. We just need numbers. ϢereSpielChequers 20:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
That would be sweet! If you can, can you get a picture of an Edison Bell phonograph, or gramophone, these might be at a museum that would let you take pictures. I have several pictures of record labels I was going to add, but the building, plus a picture of a machine (particularly an "outside horn") would really add to the quality of the article. Again, thanks! (mentally add as many exclamation marks as you feel appropriate.) 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Nipper
Well there's always Nipper .... If you can track down a London museum that has such equipment on display then we may be able to help. My last such request got a result. As for the buildings, if you can find out the numbers, and if they are still standing, we probably oblige.ϢereSpielChequers 23:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Nipper is so closely associated with Victor in the U.S. and His Master's Voice in the U.K. that I hesitate to use that image, at least anywhere near the top of the article. It should be included somewhere, though, because it is significant to the Edison Bell story. I had run across that label scan, but decided against using it because it is of such poor quality. I need to get off my duff and scan several label variations from my own collection. I unfortunately don't have any Edison Bell cylinders, although I have some British cylinders by White and London Popular which became subsidiaries of Edison Bell, and are significantly more uncommon.
Regarding the address, several come up, depending on which iteration of Edison Bell we are discussing. [1] gives a reliable address of 39 Charing Cross, as does [2] (come to think of it, this is public domain, so this advertisement could be used as a photo). [3] gives an address of 337 Charing Cross. This may have been a sub-location, most sources to seem to give 39 Charing Cross. Hope that helps. And again, thank you! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 13:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)


Hello

Hi friend, thanks for your superb goooood advice, I like ya, what did you mean welcome back by the way, I am sorry for insulting Wikipedia and writing bad words on y talk page, so sorry, ooops/sorry, now I will do Everything smoothly, I told those editors were bad becuz they edited my IP edits on an article. The corrector man (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

I worked out you weren't entirely new from your userpage. But I wasn't sure if you were an IP editor or a returnee with a new account. No need to apologise for insulting Wikipedia, plenty of us have done that, the question is what you criticise and what direction you want to take it in. Editing others article edits happens all the time - most of my edits are of that nature. The question is were they improving Wikipedia? ϢereSpielChequers 16:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks friend, I am a worn out IP editor for England, please help me, my name is Jonathan.

The corrector man (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

OK Jonathan. What sort of help do you need? ϢereSpielChequers 17:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

BLP

As a member of the music project, I can confirm that all music collections—bands, ensembles, orchestras and choirs—that have living people in them are part of the BLP project as well. That you disagree is fine. But to remove {{BLP sources}} rather than replace it with {{refimprove}} is unacceptable. I have reverted your incorrect change. Feel free to take it to a larger set of admins. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

That template starts "This biography of a living person" and you've put it on a choir, and you put it back after two different people pointed out your mistake. The BLP policy certainly does apply to BLP information anywhere in Wikipedia. But BLP sources is a specific template for biographies, it is incorrect to describe an article on a choir as a biography of a living person. ϢereSpielChequers 19:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

{{You've got mail}}


SRZ Admin userbox

Hey WSC,

Keeper wants to nuke this from his userspace. You're the only other person using it. Well, technically, the only person using it since he took it off his page. Do you want me to move it to your userspace, or should I just nuke it and you'll deal with it somehow? --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:00, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Tis gone. But thanks for asking. ϢereSpielChequers 09:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Oh, I see. People should be more patient... like I always am! Anyway, I imagine you could grab it if you wanted. --Floquenbeam (talk) 10:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

{{you've got mail}}KuyaBriBriTalk 16:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


Various

  1. Something for you to read. If you think I'm nuts don't hesitate to tell me.
  2. Are you going to Wikimania? I have 7 days left to decide whether or not I splash out $2,000 to go. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not currently planning on Montreal, thinking now of South Africa next year. But my French is un petit peu gross terrible, I'm guessing yours is much better. I won't have time to read your NPP thing for a few days at least, sorry -in a busy patch. ϢereSpielChequers 09:58, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Tanzania

Template:WikiProject Tanzania has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Proofreading ideas at Idea Lab

Proofreading ideas

Greetings! ... and thanks for your many years of hard work on the project. I invite you to comment on this. --LilHelpa (talk) 11:37, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


In London

Free tickets to the Proms have overcome my allergy to London on the 20th - I seem to remember you mentioning a regular meetup on Sunday afternoons? GoldenRing (talk) 16:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) GoldenRing Next London meetup is the 13th, event here. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Goldenring, we normally meet on the second Sunday as Joseph says, when are you in town? ϢereSpielChequers 20:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Stavros Lambrinidis == Hi, regarding this edit, please do not just blindly change file names, as it breaks the entire file and causes it not to show up in the article. You have now made this exact same edit twice despite another editor reverting you with a very clear explanation. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor 02:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Real Life Barnstar
Nice to meet you WSC, look forward to doing it again. — fortunavelut luna 11:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)


Help design a new feature to stop harassing emails

Hi there,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team plans to start develop of a new feature to allow users to restrict emails from new accounts. This feature will allow an individual user to stop harassing emails from coming through the Special:EmailUser system from abusive sockpuppeting accounts.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you voted or commented in the 2016 Community Wishlist discussion or IdeaLab discussion about letting users restrict who can send them email.

You can leave comments on this discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

It is important to hear from a broad range of people who are interested in the design of the tool, so we hope you join the discussion.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 21:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

NRG and Reliant Wikipedia pages

Hi, I noticed that you edited the NRG Energy wiki page. I am trying to write a page about Reliant, and I am wondering if I could get some feedback from you. Any help will be appreciated. Here is the Reliant draft page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Reliant_Energy Thanks Adapt16 (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Adapt. One thing jumps out at me "an annual revenue of $10.9 million and nearly 4,000 employees" that is only 2,700 revenue per employee. If that was profit, or the employees somewhere with much lower labour costs then maybe, but in the US? I don't think that's possible. ϢereSpielChequers 20:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)


Auto skip inactive editors from newsletters

Thanks for the RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Auto skip inactive editors from newsletters. EEng made a very interesting suggestion that needs consideration because it might make the RfC moot. EEng included a ping to you and me but I was not notified so perhaps you weren't either. Therefore I'm posting here to make sure you are aware of the idea.

I don't think we will want to discuss it here but I'll mention that the idea is that a subscriber would have a template on a user page which transcludes the current edition of the newsletter. The template would include a category, and everyone in that category would receive a notification when the newsletter updates. The transclusion should work, and would mean that there is only ever one edition of a particular newsletter on a page. The notification would be harder to achieve. Johnuniq (talk) 03:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, if you look at my userpage you'd see that the latest issue of the signpost is transcluded there. So I'm familiar with that route, but I don't see how we could introduce a rule against non transcluded newsletters - such a rule would be way too bureaucratic. ϢereSpielChequers 13:02,

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)


Closure

Since, you were the initiator, here's a gentle note that Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Auto skip inactive editors from newsletters has been closed as succesful.Regards:)Winged Blades Godric 14:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)


ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WereSpielChequers. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello WereSpielChequers, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

"tis the season...."

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Best wishes for the holidays...

Season's Greetings
Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Nativity scenes attributed to Zanobi Strozzi is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Season's Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:50, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

Season's Greetings!
Have a good one! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

It’s that time of year.....

Christmas tree worm, (Spirobranchus gigantic)

Atsme📞📧 17:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Time To Spread A Little
Happy Holiday Cheer!!
I decorated a special kind of Christmas tree
in the spirit of the season.

What's especially nice about
this digitized version:
*it doesn't need water
*won't catch fire
*and batteries aren't required.
Have a very Merry Christmas

and a prosperous New Year!!

🍸🎁 🎉

Yet another


Merry
Rexxmas
2018


--RexxS (talk) 18:51, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

Shearonink (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:12, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays
From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol

Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail.

So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 22:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)