User talk:WereSpielChequers/Archive 30

This is an archive of past discussions about User:WereSpielChequers. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 25

←

Archive 28

→

Home

Bling

Content

Userboxen

Editcount

Talk

Guestbook

Email

This is my archive for threads from 2017 that mainly relate to deletion.

Bregman Lagrangian

Hi, I noticed you removed the CSD template on Bregman Lagrangian. Maybe it didn't qualify for A1 but I think the point still stands that there isn't enough context for the average reader to understand what it refers to. Unrelated heads up: your supercount link on your userpage is broken (502 error). Thanks, DrStrauss talk 16:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Doc. I'd agree that it is impenetrable, but that isn't a deletion criteria. I've tagged it for the Maths crowd, hopefully that will get it some appropriate intervention. Not sure what you mean by the supercount link? Ϣere SpielChequers 16:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for that, I'm sure they will! On your user page the link to your edit count is broken. Thanks. DrStrauss talk 17:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

If you mean this it is a bit flaky even by the standards of labs. I gather there is some discussion about replacing or adopting the Xtools. It worked on one of my tries today and partially on the other, hopefully soon it will be stabilised or replaced. Ϣere SpielChequers 18:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy decline of Moin Shaikh

Hi I would like to bring to your notice that Moin Shaikh is a copyvio [1] and the creator of the page has hijacked this page Sunil Mukhi.Please look into it.Thanking you FITINDIA (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I've tagged it as a copyvio, that may well be a valid reason to delete it. Ϣere SpielChequers 15:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

RevDel request

Hi there. Would you please consider using RevDel to remove the evidence of this gratuitous unpleasantness? Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 08:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Of course. Tis gone, Ϣere SpielChequers 10:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

That's great - many thanks for your help. DBaK (talk) 10:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan Hart

I presume you also read the Talk page? I should point out that a passage was removed. It would be my responsibility to point out that should be reverted; since I "accepted" the user's removal of it immediately before I lodged the SD template. DA1 (talk) 22:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, a prod had already been declined. Notability is questionable and an AFD might well close as delete. But the test for A7 is lower, is there a credible assertion of importance. Ϣere SpielChequers 07:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Deprod: Christos Megalou

Hello, I have removed the BLP prod tag you placed on Christos Megalou, as it now has at least one RS that verifies at least one claim made in the article. I have no prejudice against nominating this article for regular prod or AfD. Cheers, —KuyaBriBri^Talk 19:07, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I've linked and partly categorised it. Ϣere SpielChequers 19:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quick question

Ehsan_Mohebbinazar appears to be a BLP created by a engineering student as a prank. See his Twitter page. Also, the source he cited for the interview he had with Nazar states: This video was produced by college students at Sharif University. This video is free of political issues. Thanks to Ehsan Mohebbi Nazar for making an interview - a dedicated broadcast from aparat.com Did I tag it correctly? ^{Atsme📞📧} 18:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Atsme. you tagged it as a hoax and it was deleted as both a hoax and an A7. I don't speak Farsi so can't check the hoax bit, and while the A7 is valid I'm hoping that my categorising him as an Iranian politician brought it to the attention of someone who knows enough about Iran to make a reasonable call. Ϣere SpielChequers 22:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

deleted material

I see you are listed as an administrator willing to show deleted material. This article was deleted yesterday, Reactions to the Las Vegas concert shooting.

I read the article and am dismayed that it was destroyed and burned. Please allow me to look at it. It is possible that there are a few references that are very good and constructive for Wikipedia. After I finish looking at it, I can ask you to destroy it. Or, if you put it in my sandbox, I will remove it after looking at it. Thank you. AGrandeFan (talk) 17:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

~~As far as I can tell everything there is now at 2017 Las Vegas shooting~~ OK it was moved to Reactions to the 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting and there are over 300 edits. I'm just checking with the deleting admin as it was a recent AFD. Ϣere SpielChequers 22:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)