User talk:Wetodid

Welcome!

Hello Wetodid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pamri • Talk 11:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Maudam[edit]

A tag has been placed on Maudam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Matt (Talk) 06:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to African American. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at African American, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Malik Shabazz. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 05:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have only added factual information. If you are concerned with the way they have been represented please correct to ensure their integrity. Otherwise you are deleting facts and manipulating the truth. Please stop now.

African American[edit]

What you added was a POV rant, not a factual addition. Then you vandalized the article to make a WP:POINT.

I don't know what's bothering you, but Wikipedia isn't the appropriate venue for your frustrations. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to African American. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have only added factual information. If you are concerned with the way they have been represented please correct to ensure their integrity. Otherwise you are deleting facts and manipulating the truth. Please stop now.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Euryalus (talk) 05:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have been blocked. Not for including a Controversy section. But for disrupting the corruption of Wikipedia. I have been in a position to remove the life of others who wish to destroy the truth. I can only hope for my chance to prevent this continued disruption of truth. Please, please do not corrupt our free encyclopedia. Please do not remove room for controversy. If you wish to take the truth from me, do it face to face. Do not steal the truth in the night. Pretend to resemble a man. I dare you. Pretend to have honor. Pretend to have responsiblity. Pretend to have a positive destination. At this point you are scum. You are taking more than you give in return. You attempt to destroy all that mankind has achieved. You leave no honorable man the choice to let you walk away free. I will explain freedom to you, given the chance. Please give me the chance. Please.

Last warning before longer block[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to African American. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. Here is the total of my addition; "Controversy Every human can trace their lineage back to Africa. Therefore every human from the Americas is African American regardless the color of their skin."

You are out of line. My addition is not vandalism in any way. You have no right to remove factual information. Stop now or justify your actions.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:01, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2nd block for disruptive editing[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 3 days as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Religion[edit]

I saw your edit summary here and then checked through the article's history, and it is clear that the wording you changed is the consensus of many editors who have worked on the article. You additions, notwithstanding your reference to Wiktionary, could be discussed on Talk:Religion but do not seem ready for incorporation into the article.

Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 18:30, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wetodid (talk) 18:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC) Tried again, this time I was careful to copy the talk page 100%![reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atheist persecution[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atheist persecution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sacred-assembly.org/persecution2.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — MusikAnimal ^talk 20:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]