User talk:WhatGuy

Welcome!

Hello, WhatGuy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! LovesMacs (talk) 19:37, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Apology

Hello, I'm very sorry about labeling your edit to The Beatles as vandalism. I saw the added "1994-1996" and didn't make the connection between those years and the Anthology CDs. I also didn't recognize the name Tony Sheridan. I'm sorry and I will try not to be as hasty in the future. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. LovesMacs (talk) 19:42, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Fluke years active

Hi, I have reverted your edit of putting Fluke "on hiatus"; this link seems to confirm otherwise as they are playing a gig on the 10th of October in London: [1] Historyofmadness (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Valhalla Rising (film)

A tag has been placed on Valhalla Rising (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pseudomonas_(talk) 16:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Delta Goodrem, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Alan (talk) 19:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Ned's Declassified Main Cast from Season 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ned's Declassified Main Cast from Season 3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ╟─TreasuryTag►Africa, Asia and the UN─╢ 12:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Songbookrobbie.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Songbookrobbie.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GrooveDog • oh hai 15:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fifteentaylormiley.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fifteentaylormiley.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Echo - Leona Lewis.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Echo - Leona Lewis.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:48, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Rolling back your redirect.

There is an ongoing AFD discussion about the Galadriel_Stineman article at AFD. You set the article as a redirect on December 16.

AFD tags should not be removed before the AFD is closed, and the redirect acts to remove that AFD tag. It is always helpful to allow editors to read an article so they may make informed decisions at AFDs. Although your redirect is a perfectly reasonable outcome for the AFD, I am rolling back the redirect until the AFD is actually over. No insult is intended. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Merry Christmas, Drake & Josh. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 19:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Echo - Leona Lewis.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Echo - Leona Lewis.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Minor edits

Please read over Help:Minor edit, because you are currently heavily abusing the feature. This is NOT a minor edit. Please stop marking edits that are not minor edits as minor. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 13:35, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

These edits, [2], are not minor edits and should not be marked as such. Looking through your contributions since the last message was left for you this issue shows to me that you are marking almost all of your edits as minor when they are not. Please stop marking these edits as minor. Aspects (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I see you are still abusing the "minor edit" flag[3]. The countless warnigns on your talkpage indicate that your editing style leaves much to be desired in other respects too. Please review WP:DISRUPT and begin to play by the rules. --dab (𒁳) 15:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Userspace

I've noticed that you're creating a big cluster of pages in your userspace - pages on which you're creating intricately-connected false histories of nonexistent bands and their fictional careers.

Please stop; Wikipedia is not here to provide free hosting for your fiction. You can do a lot of stuff in your userspace, but not that.

I'll give you a couple of days to save any content you might want to keep; after that I'm going through and deleting them all.

If you've found the interface useful, you may wish to download a free copy of the MediaWiki software. DS (talk) 14:51, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

All gone. Don't do that again. DS (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Images in you User Space

Hey there WhatGuy, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:WhatGuy/Streettide. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New-Peugeot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New-Peugeot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

NASA TV

Hey there, what is your source for the 1981 founding date you added with this edit? — Huntster (t @ c) 11:45, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Athousandmilesvictoria.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Athousandmilesvictoria.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AT8 (band)

A tag has been placed on AT8 (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vice (band)

A tag has been placed on Vice (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 17:17, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

• Please read WP:BAND to see what a band needs to have achieved before they can have a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Newt (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McDoobAU93 (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Pineapple-main-breaker.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pineapple-main-breaker.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 17:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Phil Collins, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 14:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Can't Be Tamed page move reverted

Hi WhatGuy, I just wanted to let you know that your page move was reverted as it went against consensus reached on the WikiProject Albums talk page. I put an explanation on the album's talk page, and I'm sorry I didn't make note of the resulting consensus sooner, as this would have most likely eliminated any confusion or your decision to move the namespaces. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 21:34, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to The CW4Kids. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Powergate92Talk 22:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Britain's Got Talent day change

In regards to BGT moving to Sunday due to the Champions league final, I told you so dude, don't alter my correct edits again Sepmix (talk) 08:09, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Anna Faris as Gloria in Happy Feet 2!

Can you give me the link to where you heard about this information? Gloria is my favorite character in the Happy Feet movies. I want to know if this rumor his true! --Hjfhksdjf (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:U2tower.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:U2tower.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Gay labels

I note you added that John Kennedy O'Connor has been "openly gay since 2008" to his bio page. I can assure you, as someone who knows him well, that he has been openly gay all his adult life. So why did you add such a comment, unreferenced and unsourced? Seems completely unnecessary to me. What prompted such an addition? 81.159.250.37 (talk) 15:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Alpha and Omega (film)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Alpha and Omega (film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 20:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Warning

Do not add this again, unless you can find a reliable source to back it up. Continue with your disruption and you will be blocked from editing. I suggest you heed the warnings that you have been given. Pyrrhus16 21:27, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pineapple Dance Studios (TV series)

I have nominated Pineapple Dance Studios (TV series), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pineapple Dance Studios (TV series). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:19, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Nathan Kress. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Miranda Cosgrove. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:54, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:CITV.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CITV.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to The Hub (TV network). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AdamDeanHall (talk) 19:16, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Devo 2.0.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Devo 2.0.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MascotGuy for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 24sims (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

What kinda patent nonsense is that? Your basis for the sock is ridiculous! (User account ends in "Guy"). Marked for speedy deletion. You need to come up with better grounds than that. Srobak (talk) 15:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I am not related to MascotGuy. WhatGuy (talk) 16:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

• Looks like a few of us got caught up in a Twinkle glitch, myself included. No one but a computer would have accused you of being one of this site's most recurrent pains.  :) Twinkle accused me of nominating the CU archives for speedy deletion. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:30, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cory Doran

The article Cory Doran has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Isla Fisher

Please consider reverting your categorisation, currently available evidence would tend towards her being categorized as Category:English_expatriates_in_the_United_States as whilst we can cite her nationality and Citizenship as being definitively British we cannot do the same for Australian. However as she also regularly resident in London she's more likely a British citizen living in Britain, who occasionally stays in L.A. and the term Expatriate is difficult to apply here. See the Article talkpage for further discussion on Isla's Nationality and please feel free to discuss expatriate status there. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 13:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Fizzie milk.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Fizzie milk.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CartoonNet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CartoonNet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Redirecting actors to TV shows

I noticed that you have been doing for so long now, could you please not do that any more. If the actor does not have a page on Wikipedia leave it redlinked or simply de-link it, instead always redirecting the actor's page to his most well known work. You recently did this with Tucker Albrizzi, if check his IMDB page you can clearly see that he has done other work besides Big Time Rush, which you redirected his page to. Could you please explain your reasons on why you do this? QuasyBoy 5:47, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Ennis Del Mar#Categorize sexual orientation criteria

Hello, WhatGuy. Just letting you know that the above linked discussion is why we have kept Ennis Del Mar and Jack Twist out of the gay or bisexual categories and instead have them simply placed in the LBGT categories. Their sexualities are too debated to favor either label. Flyer22 (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Jennifermoze.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jennifermoze.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 22:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Children's channels in the UK and Ireland

Template:Children's channels in the UK and Ireland has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Albert for deletion

The article Aaron Albert is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Albert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 04:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Adifferentbeat.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adifferentbeat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Power Rangers Samurai

There are several issues with your edits to this page that I have to mention.

• Do not remove red links. The cast members may have articles once the TV series premieres because they will have become notable for inclusion for being in Power Rangers.
• I don't know what is and is not included on Template:SNICK/TEENick, but just because it is airing on the network does not mean it is included in that box. It is airing on the Nicktoons channel, so it is clear that it does not fit with any of the other shows in that template. Do not put the show back on that template and do not put the template back onto any Power Rangers page.
• There are no reliable sources to say which actor is portraying which character, so this edit of yours is unsourced.
• And finally, HE HAS NEVER BEEN NAMED IN RELIABLE SOURCES.

Do not perform any of these edits again.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:34, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of Wizards of Waverly Place characters. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place (season 4). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 11:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Katelyn Pacitto listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Katelyn Pacitto. Since you had some involvement with the Katelyn Pacitto redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AussieLegend (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Athousandmilesvictoria.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Athousandmilesvictoria.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

File:SchweppesCola.jpg

File:SchweppesCola.jpg The image needs a rationale. We hope (talk) 17:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Saw your Oceanic Airlines article in progress

Hello...I saw your Oceanic Airline article in progress. I was wondering if you have read Non-Crossovers: Some Big Fake Companies? You might find it interesting. However, be warned, the article you are writing may never see main space unless you get other sources than the ones you have now. Those same sources were not enough for me to keep an article I was writing in my USER space from getting deleted. There are those out there who won't like it. LA If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 06:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MMPRgroup1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MMPRgroup1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MMPRgroup2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MMPRgroup2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

MMPR image explanations

You cannot take six or seven screencaps and put them into one image. It violates some sort of fair use thing. And also, there is already an image of the main season 1 (a.k.a. Zyuranger suit) team.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MMPRgroup3.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MMPRgroup3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:24, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PRMF.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:PRMF.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

But I really wanted this picture to be on the article.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PRRPM.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:PRRPM.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:49, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

But I really wanted this picture to be on the article.

Eurovision: Your Country Needs You

Please note that there is no such chart position in the UK singles chart as 179. The official singles chart was expanded to 75 in 1978 and has never gone beyond that cut off. A further 25 positions for 'bubbling under' singles was introduced in the late 1980's but is generally not recognised as a track's actual sales/airplay number. Any lower position is never officially published. Please desist from continuing to make this addition to the page. TVArchivistUK (talk) 15:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Fred: The Movie

You are invited to join the conversation at Talk:Fred: The Movie#Timelines. 117Avenue (talk) 22:37, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Sources needed

Do you have any reliable sources confirming that either Jeff Garlin or Bridgit Mendler will be appearing in the remaining episodes of season 4 of Wizards of Waverly Place? You've added claims to this effect a few times now,[4][5][6] but sources have never been provided and I can find nothing confirming the claims. This does not constitute a reliable source since it's not verifiable. Without reliable sources to back them up, the claims should not be restored to the article. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:14, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

I can tell you that Juliet will return in some episodes of Season 4 according to Wizards of Waverly Place Wiki, just please remove the brackets, AussieLegend -- WhatGuy (talk) 13:33, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

As I'm sure you're aware, open wikis are not considered to be reliable sources. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

McCurdy

Stop creditng the wrong songs to Jennette McCurdy.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Galadriel Stineman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Galadriel Stineman. Since you had some involvement with the Galadriel Stineman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — QuasyBoy 19:28, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronandestination.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ronandestination.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tiffany Espensen

The article Tiffany Espensen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Baseball Watcher 18:15, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronanbringyouhome.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ronanbringyouhome.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

S.L. Benfica B

Hi there GUY, VASCO here,

i don't know your intention in this article, but Ronald Koeman NEVER coached Benfica B, but the main team. Also, no need to write "final season" in the box, it's written in story, and in box it also says "dissolved - 2006".

Finally, Benfica B did not MERGE with the juniors or anything of the sort, as Benfica B was a senior team OK? Please leave it be and respect other people's work.

Attentively - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries

You are probably going to ignore this message, like all the others above this one. But could you please use an Edit summary when you a making your edits. It helps other editors know exactly what kind of edits you are making in article, Thanks. QuasyBoy 15:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jamal Mixon

The article Jamal Mixon has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SummerPhD (talk) 22:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Nedbigby.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nedbigby.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:07, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Tyler Alexander Mann listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tyler Alexander Mann. Since you had some involvement with the Tyler Alexander Mann redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JDDJS (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

2011 in American television

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to 2011 in American television. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited The Wanted, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbadian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Pink (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Happy Now? (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to American

Hey You! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to American

Pink (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aborigine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited ICarly (soundtrack), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Menudo and Naked Brothers Band (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Icarlysoundtrack2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Icarlysoundtrack2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:33, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited Trapped in a Box, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Babycomehomebush.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Babycomehomebush.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Afterlifebush.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Afterlifebush.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Headfulofghosts.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Headfulofghosts.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:27, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Afterlife (Bush song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Baby Come Home (Bush song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:29, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. When you recently edited No Doubt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Bradley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Simonnelson.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Simonnelson.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:UEFA Euro 2016 logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:UEFA Euro 2016 logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. When you recently edited List of Drake & Josh characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sparks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to I Brought You My Bullets, You Brought Me Your Love ‎, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 22:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Friginator (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Black Parade, you may be blocked from editing. Friginator (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at I'm Not Okay (I Promise), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Friginator (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Administrator's warning

Hi. I am an administrator who has been asked to review your account for possible blocking. I see that you seem to be engaged in an editing dispute with other editors.

Please make no further edits to any Wikipedia articles for now without first gaining consensus for them on the article talk pages (such as Talk:I'm Not Okay (I Promise)) from other, established editors. Otherwise, I or another administrator may block this account without further warning.

Thank you,
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 04:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Please re-read the instructions I left you on 5 September and follow them after your block expires. Otherwise you will be blocked for increasingly longer periods.
--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sideman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Violinist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bullet with Butterfly Wings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

The End Is the Beginning Is the End (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Heavy metal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milk (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stupid Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Fathers

The article Daniel Fathers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 03:10, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of 1906 (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1906 (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1906 (film) (5th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

inre 1906 (film)

Hello, WhatGuy. You have new messages at Talk:1906 (novel)#Merger proposal.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nomination of Connor Cruise for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Connor Cruise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connor Cruise (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Guano Apes

Hi WhatGuy, and thanks for your edits to the article Open Your Eyes (Guano Apes song), which I created. I couldn't help but notice your list of Guano Apes singles here. Are you planning on creating the articles for the other singles? If not, do you mind if I copy the info you have compiled on your subpage and make pages for all the other singles myself? I'm happy to do it all myself, I just figured since you've gone to all the trouble to compile this information you might want to create them yourself, and I don't want to take that away from you. Let me know :) Freikorp (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Sure, you can do that. I don't mind at all. Actually, I can do it. WhatGuy (talk) 09:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey man, i'm just curious - where did you find out that You Can't Stop Me charted at No. 99 in the UK? I'm unaware of websites that list charts in the UK past the top 40, so I can't find a reference for it. Also if you search WP:RSN you'll see that unfortunately discogs is not considered a reliable for references on wikipedia. Track listing is very unlikely to be challenged so the areas where you've been adding discogs as a reference really don't need a reference there anyway. One last thing - Sorry if you already knew this but I thought i'd let you know just in case so you don't waste your time. Unless you can find several reliable reviews for the 3 singles from Bel Air that did not chart, I wouldn't waste time making pages for them, as if a single did not chart AND did not generate significant media coverage it will be deleted as per notability guidelines. Freikorp (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I won't be creating the articles for "Break the Line" and singles from Bel Air for now. However, for the three singles from Bel Air that did not chart at all will have a mention in their articles (if it ever happens) that it failed to chart. WhatGuy (talk) 17:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Mentioning that the songs did not chart is all well and good, but as per Wikipedia:MUSIC#Recordings, a song is not considered notable just because it was performed by a notable artist. Therefore if it did not chart you would have to find several reliable reviews of the song to establish notability. If notability is not established the article will most likely be redirected back to the album article, probably by myself if nobody beats me to it. Freikorp (talk) 09:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

I've created the articles for "Sunday Lover" and "When the Ships Arrive" as redirects to Bel Air. I already knew that "This Time" is a redirect to Bel Air. They will be turned into proper articles once I find several reliable reviews of the songs to establish notablility that the singles failed to chart. I may do "Break the Line" and "Oh, What a Night" soon as they both charted. WhatGuy (talk) 09:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Check it out man, I got "You Can't Stop Me" featured on the front page of wikipedia in the "Did You Know" section: nomination discussion can be found here: Template:Did you know nominations/You Can't Stop Me. The article is currently on the front page and will be for the next several hours =D Freikorp (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kumba Yo! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fucking

No Speech (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Big in Japan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wire to Wire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Bright World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New wave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Living TV Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freeview (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:WhatGuy/Sandbox3

User:WhatGuy/Sandbox3, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WhatGuy/Sandbox3 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WhatGuy/Sandbox3 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 12:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:WhatGuy/Sandbox2

User:WhatGuy/Sandbox2, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WhatGuy/Sandbox2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WhatGuy/Sandbox2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 12:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Little Baby Swastikkka

The article Little Baby Swastikkka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability (WP:SONG), no content that cannot be easily contained in article on band

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Bowie discography, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Without You I'm Nothing and Greatest Hits III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of bisexual people (N–S), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Hero of the Day, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you.--77.29.152.139 (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

All I Want (Skunk Anansie song)

All I Want (Skunk Anansie song) was released in September 1996, not April. I have added a source to support that. It would be good if you could say where you are getting your information from and use the edit summary if possible. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guano Apes discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Garbage genres discussion

Hello. You're a past editor in the Garbage articles, would you mind giving your input on the latest discussion? Talk:Garbage_(band)#Genres. --Lpdte77 (talk) 01:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

SpongeBong HempPants listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SpongeBong HempPants. Since you had some involvement with the SpongeBong HempPants redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ... discospinster _talk 14:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Carlie Casey listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carlie Casey. Since you had some involvement with the Carlie Casey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JDDJS (talk) 04:31, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 08:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png

Thank you for uploading File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sources for non-free images.

Hi WhatGuy. I saw that you added the non-free rationale for File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png so that it can be used in 21st Century Film Corporation. You, however, forgot to add a source for the image and a source is required for all non-free images so that it can be verified that they have been previously published (WP:NFCC#4) and so their copyright information can be verified as well. Do you remember where you got the image from or which webpage you download the image from? If you do, then just add that information to the rationale; Otherwise, the image can be deleted. The same also applies to File:Franchisepictures.png. It has a rationale, but no source. So if you remember where you got that image from then, please add that information to the image's non-free use rationale. Thanks. - Marchjuly (talk) 14:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Just want to add that some kind of official website, etc. is needed so that copyright status of the image can be verified. Anything official which clearly shows that the logos are actually used by the companies should be OK. Forums, personal blogs, wiki-sites or other user-generated websites are not really acceptable unless there's a link provided to a source which allows the image to be verified. Otherwise, there's no way to know for sure whether the image was actually used by the company. - Marchjuly (talk) 14:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

The 21st Century Film Corporation logo as seen in the opening for their films is a difficult-to-find logo and several of the sources are from wiki-sites, personal blogs and other user-generated websites. - WhatGuy (talk) 17:20 GMT, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

OK. Thank you for the clarification. Do you know if the company ever had a webpage? Maybe there's an archived version of it somewhere showiing the logo. Do you remember the url of the site where you found the logo? If the company never had an official website, then maybe where you got the image would be acceptable in this case. It can be asked about at WP:NFCR. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:28, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

There was no official website for the studio but I remember the URL of the site where I found the logo. Here it is but sadly is from a wiki-site: http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130121153551/logopedia/images/b/bf/21st_Century_Film_Corporation_logo.png - WhatGuy (talk) 22:32 GMT, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I'll add it as a source to the image for now, so that the image is not deleted while it's being discussed and then I'll ask about it at NFCR. Perhaps I'm wrong about the source. It wouldn't be the first time I was wrong. Anyway, thanks for finding it. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Just for reference, I asked about this at WP:NFCR#File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png. The problem with uploading non-free content from user-generated sites like Logopedia, etc. is that there's usually no way to verify who the original copyright holder, etc. is so that the image satisfies WP:NFCC#10a. Official websites almost always say something like "Copyrighted by XXXXX" somewhere on the website. User-generated pages, on the other hand, tend to contain images/content which are uploaded anonymously from another website and the uploader is almost always not the creator of the content and almost always is not really too concerned with copyright issues. This is one reason why links to YouTube videos, etc. almost always have problems with WP:LINKVIO. Links to copyrighted material improperly uploaded to other websites is not allowed to be made on Wikipedia so if you know anything at all about the copyright holder which can help clarify the image's copyright status, then please add that to the image's rationale. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

We are not going to be able to use the Logopedia as a source because there's no way to verify the image's copyright from it and there's way to know if the site has permission to use the image per WP:COPYLINK. It is, however, possible to use a movie in which the logo was used as the source. Do you know of any of hand? We do not need a link to the movie itself; We just need the name, year, perhaps the production company, etc. (the information in WP:NFCC#10a) to use in the source.

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Steel (1997 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Napier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:WhatGuy/Spider-Man 4

User:WhatGuy/Spider-Man 4, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WhatGuy/Spider-Man 4 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WhatGuy/Spider-Man 4 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:WhatGuy/Episodes3

User:WhatGuy/Episodes3, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WhatGuy/Episodes3 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WhatGuy/Episodes3 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spiderwebsnodoubt.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Spiderwebsnodoubt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WhatGuy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Lee Quigley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Quigley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Quigley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Matt Deres (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matt Riedy

Hello WhatGuy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Matt Riedy for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Zazzysa (talk) 00:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WhatGuy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Lifejan301970.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lifejan301970.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WhatGuy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Marcus Little.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marcus Little.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:21stcenturyfilmcorporation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"Robert Feggans" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Robert Feggans. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 12#Robert Feggans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Evenif.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Evenif.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Why do you want to duplicate all sections in an article?

Yesterday you have added all sections in the article Stars in Their Eyes a second time. That makes no sense, so I've reverted it. But you have reverted it without any comments, now all sections of the article are duplicated again. Why do you insist on duplicating all sections of the article. Are you a vandal? --GünniX (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

No, I'm not a vandal. I did actually try to revert the edits from 146.90.36.107 back to the one I edited two days ago to no avail and I apologise for duplicating, therefore I will now stop doing duplicating them. WhatGuy (talk) 18:58, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"List of Billboard Best Selling Pop Albums number ones of of 1951" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect List of Billboard Best Selling Pop Albums number ones of of 1951 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 8 § List of Billboard Best Selling Pop Albums number ones of of 1951 until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited France (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babacar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)