User talk:Whistling Dragonslayer

July 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Hamza Ali Shah. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chris Keates have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hamza Ali Shah ^Talk 23:33, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So Re Chris Keates links that are “in constructive” are wiped …[edit]

Why have you deleted a verifiable court decision… because you state it is “not constructive “ ? Therefore Wikipedia only publishes what it wants regardless of legal decisions and verifiable case history? What is Wikipedia then? A Cherry picking organisation?

That is extremely scary… frightening is Whistling Dragonslayer (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia admins wipe out verifiable court’s decisions … Whistling Dragonslayer (talk) 00:14, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits have not been competent. It is clear that you have not thoroughly read and completely studied Referencing for beginners in enough depth to add properly referenced content to the encyclopedia at thus point. So, please study over and over until you understand what you have been doing wrong, and proceed accordingly, doing things correctly going forward. Thank you. Cullen328 (talk) 06:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The editor prior to me @Warofdreams has used his/her own formatting which makes it difficult to add in my links. Whistling Dragonslayer (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]