User talk:Whiteguru/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lima Liturgy on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:34, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

  • GA Review page started --Whiteguru (talk) 08:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Done

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Korean creation narratives on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! :
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)  Done (another editor has taken this)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

  • Under consideration. There appears to be a discussion going on with some editors over there. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
  • Have to say this page keeps on getting edited, edited, and edited. I decline the invitation to do a GA Review. no Declined

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Korean mythology on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! : Done
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Éomer on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!  Done
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name .

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Elf (Middle-earth) on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!  Done
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Battle of the Morannon on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! : Done
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Life replacement narratives on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)  Done

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anthony Kohlmann on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!  : Done
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Song of Dorang-seonbi and Cheongjeong-gaksi on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!:  Done
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Mordor on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!  Not done -- Another editor has taken this.
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer granted

Hi Whiteguru. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.  Done

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Chetsford (talk) 22:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing, Islamic Mysticism in Afghanistan

Someone suggested that this article can be expanded by using Google scholar, can you please help to expand the article, lolMajun e Baqi (talk) 06:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Smiley You're welcome!

July 2020

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wembley Central Mosque. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC) (orange butt icon Buttinsky)

Category:Virginity testing has been nominated for deletion

Category:Virginity testing has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)     Accepted --Whiteguru (talk) 01:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Rename China railway signalling as Draft:

Would you be happy if this were done to "China railway signalling" ? ----MountVic127 (talk) 08:35, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

@MountVic127: Yes, this is a workable solution. Whiteguru (talk) 22:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Done

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sri Santhana Venugopala Swamy Temple Thettu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aradhana. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)  Done

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Lord of the Rings on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)  Done (another editor has taken this)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Orca's Song on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 6 August 2020 (UTC)  Done (another editor has taken this)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:How Long 'til Black Future Month? on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

All cleanup matters sorted. GA is completed.  Done

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Whiteguru

Thank you for creating Muhammad Waqaruddin Qadri.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

neat work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2020 (UTC)  Not done. This is a stuff up. It should be on the page creator's talk page. I was the reviewer. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Whiteguru

Thank you for creating Tsering Wangyal.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Neat work.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 06:45, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Not done. This is a stuff up. It should be on the page creator's talk page. I was the reviewer. --Whiteguru (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fasana-e-Azad on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)  Done (another editor has taken this)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:In Praise of Polytheism on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)  Done (another editor has taken this)

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Averroes' theory of the unity of the intellect  Done and Talk:Robert Austin Markus  Done on "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nominations. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jan de Vries (philologist) on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Done

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Odyssey on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)     Done

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Averroes's theory of the unity of the intellect on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)  Done

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Maronite Church on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC) no Declined - failed by another editor 26 September 2020. -- Whiteguru (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

ANI

Despite me telling the user multiple times they must notify you, it doesn't appear they've listened. There is currently a discussion at ANI that involves you. See here. Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2020 (UTC)  Acknowledged

David Blunt (footballer)

I'd like to notify you that Blunt did play in the Football League Fourth Division, which should qualify under WP:FOOTYLEAGUE. Lettlerhellocontribs 13:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

@Lettler: Your reference to WP:FOOTYLEAGUE does not cite 4th level division football as eligible for notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 10:59, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

@Whiteguru: Can you really read ? This is a quote from the lead-in at WP:FOOTYLEAGUE: ″This page is part of the WikiProject on Football and provides a list of known fully professional leagues, and also those that are known to not be fully professional. As such, this list can be used as an aid in considering the WP:NFOOTBALL guideline, which states that "Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a competitive game between two teams from fully-professional leagues, will generally be regarded as notable."″ (my underlining the important stuff in this context). And then you go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues#Men's leagues and look for England and there you will find this list of divisions: England – Premier League, EFL Championship, EFL League One, EFL League Two. And the latter one are a predecessor of Football League Fourth Division. Best regards Migrant (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Migrant: Yes, I have read this many times while doing NPP. If you don't like it, take it to RfC for a community clarification. The community needs to state that Football League Fourth Division is read as one with EFL League Two, which does not specify a Fourth Division -- Whiteguru (talk) 22:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Article getting declined please help

Hello, I need help please I am trying to create this article for this turkish rapper. but they keep declining it.

can you help thanks?

I need to know what is missing I wish they can show examples can you help?  Done


Hey thank you so much for your help. not getting declined anymore but don't know when it will be live Swaggaofficial (talk) 00:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Removal of PROD at Thy hand, O God, has guided

I have removed the WP:PROD tag at Thy hand, O God, has guided as I believe there is sufficient evidence of notability. Please see the talk page entry. --papageno (talk) 02:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)  Resolved

Canopy express?

Talk:Canopy express#Requested move 19 September 2020 --Guy Macon (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing Cookie Dough Bites (Candy) - why is it still not showing up in Google search?

Hi, thank you for reviewing Cookie Dough Bites (Candy) article. I'm confused as to why it isn't showing up in Google search after review and after 90 days of its creation?

Can you help? I created the article in place of a similar article that had been simply reduced to a redirect to "Cookie Dough". Is that decade-old re-direct keeping this new Cookie Dough Bites (candy) page from being indexed? I just can't see any reason why it's not showing up in my searches and I'm confused as to the process or issue. Thank you! /MarvelJason/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvelJason (talkcontribs) 17:24, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@MarvelJason: You need to engage in search engine optimisation. So search for it, search using the page url, search using wikipedia "Cookie Dough Bites" (or reverse that). The talk page is coming up with similar results. Is there any particular reason why you are concerned about this? -- Whiteguru (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Whiteguru Yeah, the talk page has been coming up for months in search, which is why I think there's a weird issue with that old re-direct from a decade ago, which I can't seem to get rid of. I'm thinking it's a weird technical issue causing the search to never find anything other than Cookie Dough (which is where the redirect has pointed to the last ten years).

As for why I'm interested? Well, I'm just trying to learn more about Wikipedia and how to navigate it and contribute to it, and it's been more serpentine and confusing than I expected it to be, so when I come upon something that doesn't make sense, I'm trying to understand it. I'm a noted and (I hope) respected candy historian and have published hundreds of articles on the subject, and oftentimes I find the historical accuracy of Wikipedia pages on candy history to be wanting, if not wildly inaccurate. So, if I can, I'd like to contribute to improving some of that accuracy, over time. But I want to understand the ins and outs of the system, and it's still mysterious on many levels to me, this search issue included. It took me a couple weeks just to figure out how to properly annotate an article.

I really did think the re-direct is preventing Google Search from ever seeing the article, optimization notwithstanding, but I'll keep trying and see what happens. Still lots to learn for me. Thanks for responding!

-Jason — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvelJason (talkcontribs) 20:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

@Whiteguru: Hi again, I'm still confused as to why everything BUT the page itself is showing up in search. The reference photo is, the talk page is, but the only page that shows up in search is for "Cookie Dough" which is where the old redirect page directed to. Is there anyway to get rid of all of that redundant re-direct page business? The talk page seems to also be for something someone tried to create a decade ago but failed, so it's not germane to this article. Still confused. It seems clear that, given how the redirect is structured, it will always hide this page from search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvelJason (talkcontribs) 04:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)  Investigating...

thank you

I'm flattered -- Louis P. Boog (talk) 14:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)   Smiley You're welcome!

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Georges Dumézil on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)  Done

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julián is a Mermaid on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)     Pass Pass

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Winfred P. Lehmann on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 Done (another editor has taken this)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Edgar C. Polomé on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 Done (another editor has taken this)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

Would you review EditPad ?

Would you review EditPad and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EditPad (3rd nomination)? I believe the few people who have opined either don't understand the subject or have some sort of bias. It does not seem easy to find qualified wikipedians for this task. Oko5ekmi5 (talk) 09:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hilda Ellis Davidson on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hector Munro Chadwick on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lee M. Hollander on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Allen Mawer on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jaan Puhvel on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done (another editor has taken this)

Can you help please Whiteguru.

Hello, We spoke before hope all is well. You helped me on couple of things and gave me some examples as well. Is there any way you can help approving my article or gotta wait ? Bobby lee swagger (talk) 01:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Philosophy and religion Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Metropolitan Community Church of Washington, D.C. on a "Philosophy and religion" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:32, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

 

 GA on hold (review completed, await resolution of questions) --Whiteguru (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

Feedback request: Language and literature Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Shenandoah 1862 on a "Language and literature" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

.🪔HappyDeepawali🪔May this festival bring peace and blessings to you and your family.💠245CMR💠.👥📜 10:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Whiteguru,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

Happy New Year