User talk:WikiConqueror

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, WikiConqueror, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ajeem95 (talk | bincang (ms) | cont) 10:50, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Mandatory ANI Notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested Reading[edit]

I've not been the most gracious of hosts - hell, from your point of view I've probably been rather mean and/or cruel to you since you first had the misfortune to cross with me - but as a new user I thought I'd leave a link for you: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Academy. The stuff in there is somewhat specialized to the Military history Project, but as you are making a good faith attempt to contribute here I thought you may be able to make some use of the material present. Our academy was set up to help out new comers and to offer advise and suggestions on how to make useful contributions with an eye toward milhist, but I figure it can't hurt to offer a helping hand. If you can use something from there in your Wikipedia editing then it wasn't a wasted effort. TomStar81 (Talk) 12:39, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I really appreciate it! WikiConqueror (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Your article[edit]

Thank you for creating A Concert of Remembrance.

However, there are not enough sources to prove the topic is notable, or that it's suitable for a standalone article.

Notability on Wikipedia is based on notice from the outside world. Topics have to be described in detail by several reputable sources before it can merit a standalone article. Reputable sources include news, books, and academic articles. Non-reputable sources include gossip, social networks, YouTube, and blogs.

Please add sources to prove that your topic is notable; otherwise the topic cannot be covered on Wikipedia. Here are some searches you can conduct to find them:

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

If you can't find sources after a search, it may be deleted. However, you may also want to consider merging or redirecting to another article even if it is not notable.

You may find the below resources to be useful:

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask via a reply below. Thank you. Esquivalience t 23:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a note about the article: events, such as individual performances, require not only notability, but also lasting effect or coverage, because Wikipedia is much more of an encyclopedia than a newspaper. This means that even performances by the most notable orchestras (such as the Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra) do not get articles. This article even qualifies to be deleted quickly, as it does not demonstrate notability (by citing sources), significance, or importance. I reverted my initial tagging because redirection was an option and I wanted to explain the notability guidelines to you before doing anything, but I strongly suggest that you blank-and-redirect the article to Elgin Symphony Orchestra. Esquivalience t 23:53, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Esquivalience. I added some more sources to prove that my topic is notable and some new categories. I don't think that the article should be blanked and redirected because the article should stand alone as a memorial for the September 11 attacks. WikiConqueror (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for making an effort to find sources and working to advance Wikipedia's coverage of 9/11 (indirectly); nonetheless, Wikipedia has a very high bar for standalone event articles (per the notability guidelines for events), and they need to have a lasting effect or significance–as Wikipedia is not a newspaper. However, the symphony can still be covered in the article about the orchestra who performed it (Elgin Symphony Orchestra); readers who want to read about the performance will most likely know it not by name but by its corresponding orchestra's name. Esquivalience t 00:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anne Apra[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anne Apra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:22, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frantic Lounge Films[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Frantic Lounge Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 02:25, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael McAdam[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael McAdam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:26, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelli Crawford[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kelli Crawford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of JP Sarro[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JP Sarro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Voices Keri[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Voices Keri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Voices Keri for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voices Keri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voices Keri until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melanie Salisbury[edit]

The article Melanie Salisbury has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability. I find no independent coverage of substance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blane Pressler[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blane Pressler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 02:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Artes Vocales of Los Angeles[edit]

The article Artes Vocales of Los Angeles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable group. Few Google hits for "artes vocales of los angeles", generally affiliated, event listings, and blogs. One unhelpful hit under Google News.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Venom (2014 film)[edit]

The article Venom (2014 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable short film. Google yields 73 hits for venom "michael mcadam", none with nontrivial coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:45, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haunters (TV series)[edit]

The article Haunters (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV series. Series? One season, one episode?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Undercover Squad[edit]

The article The Undercover Squad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable TV "series" (never got past the pilot), no applicable coverage found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kindly intended note[edit]

I suspect the above torrent of deletion notices has squelched your enthusiasm. I feel bad about that because your earnestness is clear. But I do see that you've had some articles deleted in the past, and some of the ones that User:Reddogsix and I deleted in the last hour or so are older but may have missed scrutiny before.

I'd like to recommend that you continue to identify subjects for good Wikipedia articles, but that when you do, you check first to make sure they are notable, as I explained to you in my remarks at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Whine Party. If you can scrounge up enough suitable source yourself, that have substantial coverage, are independent of the subject (not the actors' own websites, not the program from a theater where the symphony performed, etc.), and aren't routine and relatively trivial (like local theater listings) that will really help in cases where those are hard to identify. Largoplazo (talk) 02:59, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lisa Christine Holmberg[edit]

Hello, WikiConqueror. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Lisa Christine Holmberg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Largoplazo (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ron Bush[edit]

The article Ron Bush has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, stated to be best "known for" bit parts in a TV series episode and a film.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Largoplazo (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, WikiConqueror. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

children's chorus

Thank you for quality articles around art and entertainment, beginning with Elgin Children's Chorus, for Jenne Lennon, Holiday Showcase and Steven Kronauer, for improving Frankie Grande ‎ and Los Angeles Children's Chorus, for your "strive to better Wikipedia", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

Miss you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1789 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Metalheads (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metalheads (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metalheads (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:14, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Lutheran Church, Elgin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. schetm (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiConqueror&oldid=1041070756"