User talk:Willdow/Archive 2
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Arbcom case
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Gibraltar and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, EyeSerenetalk 13:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
ArbCom case has opened
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page,Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gibraltar/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Funeral Games
Hi Will, I'm still in the middle of 'Funeral Games'. Give me a few minutes, as I'm just trying to polish my first draft. We are conflicting with our edits. I'll try to sort obvious things like disambig, and I've added refs. Thanks. Centrepull (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Birmingham Photos
Hello
The reason why i have added the pictures is because it shows what airlines can be seen there, and i am attempting to get every airport in the UK and spain with plane pictures on the side of it.
Airports which currently have this:
- Malaga
- Lanzarote
- Palma
- Manchester
so could i add the pictures back (Except Onur Air) --MKY661 (talk) 20:01, 11 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MKY661 (talk •contribs) 20:00, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:
- Any uninvolved administrator may, in his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor editing Gibraltar or other articles concerning the history, people, or political status of Gibraltar if, after a warning, that editor repeatedly or seriously violates the behavioral standards or editorial processes of Wikipedia in connection with these articles.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard) or the Arbitration Committee.
- Gibnews (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from editing the Gibraltar article and other articles concerning the history, people, and political status of Gibraltar, broadly construed, for one year. Should Gibnews return to editing relating to Gibraltar following this period, he is reminded to edit in accordance with the principles discussed in this decision and will be subject to the discretionary sanctions remedy should he fail to do so.
- Gibnews is strongly warned that nationally or ethnically offensive comments are prohibited on Wikipedia and that substantial sanctions, up to a ban from the site, will be imposed without further warning in the event of further violations.
- Justin A Kuntz (talk · contribs) is topic-banned from editing Gibraltar and other articles concerning the history, people, and political status of Gibraltar, broadly construed, for three months. Should Justin A Kuntz return to editing relating to Gibraltar following this period, he is reminded to edit in accordance with the principles discussed in this decision and will be subject to the discretionary sanctions remedy should he fail to do so.
- Ecemaml (talk · contribs) is admonished for having, at times, assumed bad faith and edited tendentiously concerning the history and political status of Gibraltar.
- Editors are reminded that when editing in subject areas of bitter and long-standing real-world conflict, it is all the more important to comply with Wikipedia policies such as assuming good faith of all editors including those on the other side of the real-world dispute, writing with a neutral point of view, remaining civil and avoiding personal attacks, utilizingreliable sources for contentious or disputed assertions, and resorting to dispute resolution where necessary.
- Any editor who is closely associated with a particular source or website relating to the subject of Gibraltar or any other article is reminded to avoid editing that could be seen as an actual or apparent attempt to promote that source or website or to give it undue weight over other sources or website in an article's references or links. To avoid even the appearance of impropriety, it may be best in these circumstances to mention the existence of the source or website on the talkpage, and allow the decision whether to include it in the article to made by others.
For the Arbitration Committee, ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 23:13, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
If you were making a request for protection, please ask at at WP:RPP. The template {{editsemiprotected}}
is for IPs and new users to request edits be done. Thank you, {{Sonia|talk|simple}} 09:52, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- Never mind, I see you've done it. (sorry, I have a slow computer). {{Sonia|talk|simple}} 09:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- I couldn't find the WP:RPP page, but followed the link in your message to it, thanks for the help :)WillDow (Talk) 10:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Taybarn.jpg
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploadingFile:Taybarn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
RFC
Talk:Gibraltar#RfC: Due weight & NPOV in the History section I have started an RFC to gather outside opinion related to this issue. Thought you may have an interest in commenting. Thanks. Wee Curry Monster talk 20:39, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Tax in Gibraltar
http://www.gibraltar.gov.gi/e-business/taxation
The GoG website explains it quite well.
There was a seminar in Zurich in 2009 that went into the ins/outs of the proposals and the regulation regime.
Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 18:34, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that - I've taken a shot at updating it without changing all of the words!WillDow (Talk) 12:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |