User talk:WimePocy
This is WimePocy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
![]() | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of User:WimePocy
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Welcome
[edit]Hello, WimePocy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Cheers! Fakescientist8000 20:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
Alt account
[edit]Per WP:VALIDALT, can you link this alt account with the main User:Fakescientist8000 on both user pages? Thanks! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:12, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- @The ed17 I actually already have. See the userbox on both my alt and my main on it. Cheers. WimePocy 22:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Notification
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
ITN recognition for George Elder (baseball)
[edit]On 14 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article George Elder (baseball), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 08:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mac Jones, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Boogeymen (American football) moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Boogeymen (American football), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at James Robinson (running back), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Swagging (talk) 00:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- The Jaguars and Jets have not yet announced the trade themselves.
Elon's political affiliation
[edit]https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1589722050998210561 – Muboshgu (talk) 04:13, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: Thank you. Cheers. WimePocy 13:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Hi WimePocy! Thank you for your edits to Draft:Nikolas Cruz. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Stoneman Douglas High School shooting into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 23:29, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
A question about editing/deletion
[edit]Hi WimePocy, I have a question about editing vs. speedy deletion. Yesterday, I saw that the new Sight & Sound Poll for 2022 was out. I saw that WP had an article for 2012 that contained the lists released that year. So I wrote some code to assemble the 2022 list information and parse it into the same WP list format used in the 2012 page, added some commentary on the new number 1s and some cites, and posted the new article.
Since then, that article has been speedy deleted, and the 2012 article edited to remove the lists. I'm not questioning the issue of copyright in lists -- that's a question for lawyers, I'm not one, and I assume it's already been resolved. My question is why the 2022 article deserved speedy deletion when:
- It contained (give or take) the same additional information as the 2012 article, so it could have been similarly trimmed.
- The 2012 article has, since its creation in 2012, contained a large portion of the lists.
If the 2012 article has existed for ten years with a copyright violation, how can the 2022 article require such a rush to delete? Wouldn't it have made more sense to simply delete the lists, point out why, and encourage enhancement of the article? Geoff Canyon (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Gcanyon I'm gonna be completely honest with you: I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm assuming you're talking to me because I closed the ITN blurb, but I'm not involved with this conflict, so I'm not really the person to talk to. I'm sorry about that. If you need any other help with WP, for anything, I'm here and I can try to help you. Cheers. WimePocy 04:14, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks -- the overlap of the ITN and speedy deletion discussion mixed me up about who was responsible for what (especially since I was completely unfamiliar with ITN). I'll find someone else to ask, thanks. Geoff Canyon (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ronnie Hillman
[edit]On 27 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ronnie Hillman, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Anarchyte (talk) 07:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Apology
[edit]I completely missed your vote vis a vis your description, my bad.
Unhappy yet not surprised it got pulled and closed before debate to re-post, but at least I suppose this gives receipts for when the same people opposing LeBron inevitably nominate some soccer or cricket record that receives overwhelming support. The Kip (talk) 21:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
@The Kip: All good! We’re all friends here, hopefully. :]
Anywho, yeah, not too too happy it got pulled. The anti-USA bias there is pretty insane (re: Shane Warne’s death taking up the front page for how long? 4 weeks maybe?). And yeah, I’ve never called soccer football, personally. However, your misunderstanding is totally okay! :] Cheers. WimePocy 22:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Rhamondre Stevenson.jpg
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Rhamondre Stevenson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:San Antonio Brahmas logo.jpg
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:San Antonio Brahmas logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
There are no sources supporting "John" as a middle name for Franklin. Why did you add it? Schazjmd (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Boogeymen (American football)
[edit] Hello, WimePocy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boogeymen (American football), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Reggie Corbin moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Reggie Corbin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Black fashion
[edit] Hello, WimePocy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black fashion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:Black fashion has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz Read! Talk! 21:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit] Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 22:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Boat Race 2024
[edit] Hello, WimePocy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Boat Race 2024, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Boat Race 2024
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, WimePocy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Boat Race 2024".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Boogeymen (American football)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, WimePocy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Boogeymen".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)