User talk:Work number1987
December 2011[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Rem Koolhaas, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Velella Velella Talk 12:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- In the case of potentially controversial statements concerning living people it is particularly important to provide reliable sources. In addition, your edits are not in coherent English, and part of what you have written is very difficult to understand. Perhaps you would be more successful contributing to Wikipedia in your native language, rather than English Wikipedia (Dutch Wikipedia perhaps?). JamesBWatson (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately you seem to have misunderstood the nature of Wikipedia, in at least two respects.
- Vast numbers of people edit Wikipedia. There is no way of knowing who an editor is. There are people who come here to vandalise and lie. There are others who come here in good faith, making edits which they believe are valid, but which are in fact mistaken. There are people who insist that what they say is THE TRUTH, while others insist equally firmly that the opposite is THE TRUTH. We cannot possibly accept information on the grounds that someone chooses to create a Wikipedia account and say that information is "true". Information posted here must be verifiable by means of references to reliable sources. Otherwise the material will be removed.
- Wikipedia is not a medium for righting wrongs, or for use by anyone as part of a campaign to publicise their point of view, no matter how valid that point of view may be. Wikipedia takes a neutral point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- I understand the situation, there must be a neutral point of view and you need references without harming the standard guiding lines. I am going to search for solid resources — Preceding Work number1987 comment added by 77.248.229.89 (talk) 16:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2014[edit]
Hi! Thanks for helping edit History of Balochistan, but your edit restated the obvious, so I reverted it. Don't feel bad, as I can see you were trying to help, so I didn't give you a warning. You can still edit, though! I'm not upset at all. Jwood (leave me a message) See what I'm up to 18:13, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 3 December[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Bamyan Province page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 4[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- History of the Jews in India
- added links pointing to Indian and Bani Israel
- Gedrosia (satrapy)
- added a link pointing to Pura
- Kapoor family
- added a link pointing to Background
- List of Baloch tribes
- added a link pointing to Iranian
- Shabana Azmi
- added a link pointing to Scandinavian
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Afghana. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN talk to me 15:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:NeilN. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:NeilN, you may be blocked from editing. You may not change the comments made by another user. You may reply to them, below their message—in which case, please make sure you sign your message. —C.Fred (talk) 00:48, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
- It's not as much of a problem, but it is bad form to edit your own comments after others have replied to them, as you're doing at User talk:Dr Pukhtunyar Afghan. —C.Fred (talk) 01:12, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 24 December[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Hindkowans page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 25[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. This is related to your addition of hoaxes to multiple articles: when you add information in front of a citation, you're claiming that it's in the cited document, and making this claim when it's not in the source is a hoax. When the block has expired, everyone will be happy to help you if you're interested in understanding our standards better, but if you continue hoaxing and adding unsourced information, the next block may well be indefinite. Nyttend (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Suggestion[edit]
You should really stop mixing different cultures with each other without providing a reliable citation. Not only here, but anywhere else when you are engaging in mixing different cultures, changing dates, etc. without having any basis for your claims, it is viewed as pseudohistorical revisionism. Also, why you spell Peshawar as Peshewer?
It may be more helpful to you, if you spend some time in reading than editing. Once you are well versed with the history and the current situation of the subjects where you are actually interested, you will find it easier to contribute with others. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC)