User talk:Wrwr1

Welcome!

Hello, Wrwr1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dominic Adiyiah

Gosh, all those changes gave me a headache! No, seriously... thanks for making me aware of that user faking stats. :) Anyway, why did you remove also the 24 apps for Hearts of Lions? They're reported by both AC Milan official webiste and national-football-teams.com. Luxic (talk) 15:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mmh... yeah, you seem to be right. I'll remove them and leave a hidden comment, so people will know. Luxic (talk) 16:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I did it (see diff). Tell me if you see something wrong. Luxic (talk) 16:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andre ayew source

He played in five matches and scored two goals at the 2009 African Youth Championship and played in seven matches at the two goals at the 2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup. He did not play in any of the qualification matches for the former tournament because he was still contemplating whether to represent France.

I would of appreciate you coming to me before removing the stats. Just because you thinks it "seems fake" doesn't mean it is. – Joao10Siamun (talk) 00:29, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All three group stage matches, semi-final, and final. As for friendlies......are there any sources that state that the team played friendlies between the African Youth Championships in January 2009 to the FIFA World Cup in October 2009? Btw, do you research these statistics you remove them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joao10Siamun (talk • contribs) 00:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't resort to attempts of outwitting. It's very over-rated. Again by providing a source of the friendly against Bulgaria, you continue to assume. In this case, assuming that Ayew played in the friendly. If you were to follow up on it (not being lazy in your words), you would have realized that he didn't play in the match or was even called up. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 01:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion board? First off, it's hearsay. Second, hopefully if you continued reading (big hopeful : P), then you'd realize that the users are having a difficult time figuring out who's actually playing. One guy stated: "Well Ayew was also reported absent but we were able to spot him in the video because of his fair color and the assist he gave." Seriously? I even found a YouTube vid of the match and couldn't even tell, myself, if he was out there. Anyway, I'm done with this. If you can find a source confirming he played in the Bulgaria match (try the Bulgaria FA site), then so be it; add 13 appearances, but as of right now, he's played in 12 competitive matches for the under-20 team and scored four goals. Later. — Joao10Siamun (talk) 02:05, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Abdul Moustapha Ouedraogo, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 02:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Stephane Owona. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 02:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Christian Fabrice Okoua. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Donald Duck (talk) 03:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)~~ [reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:Donald Duck. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Donald Duck (talk) 17:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The monster is back!

Hi there WRx2, VASCO from Portugal here,

I see that you have continued (as i) your struggles with User:Zombie433. Yes, he has returned to active, now editing anon, i found out about him at Baba Sule, and rolledback immediately. I have also started a discussion at WP:FOOTY.

Cheers, happy weekend - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:21, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Adjei, Zombies & stuff

Hi. Listen, I see you´re doing the annoying work to undo all the mess that User:Zombie344 or 433 or whatever, did in an enormous number of footy articles all around. I am aware of that. Also, you probably don´t know, Vasco does, that I was one of the few footy editors that ever got answers from that Zombie guy in some aproach over some dubious edits of his. The impression I got was that he was some kid, or perhaps he has some problems, anyway, I had much patience and good-will with him initially, but after a few attempts to explain him what he was doing wrong, my approaches started to be ignored, just as he did with most other editors that aproached him. Anyway, I´m telling you this just for you to know that I am familiarised with the kind of disruprion the guy did. I´m just not sure if you are familiarised with the kind of methodology the guy worked with. For exemple, he used to pick some source he finds in some website, and writes all from that source down in all the articles (he thinks) are related. What was the problem then, well, the problem was that if he finded a list of squads from matches from some african league with only surnames, he just suposed the surnames belonged to the ones with WP article, which ended up being ~90% of time wrong. Said this, his intention was good, and that is why initially I was patient with him, the problem was that he added 9 times in 10 wrong info in articles. However, 1 in 10 was right. Now, you must understand that not necessarily all his edits are allways wrong, and your edit summary is in part right, because 90% wrong info is fake, but in another sense it isn´t. Anyway, don´t fall into the temptation of considering every revert of your reverts of Zombie wrong. See my point? I was the one followed Vasco´s frustration all the way, and I was in exact same situation, and you doing this job is a blessing for WP, however, I am not sure you have this in the right perspective, meaning, Zombie doesn´t faked the stats on purpouse, but in some strange selfish desire to forcebly complete players careers that ended up with huge mess.

So, this is where we come to the cases where I revrted you, so I hope you don´t think I am defending Zombie, or something similar, its just that those were "my" sources and info on that particular article, and you may ocasionally find edits of Zombie that were good. So, thanks for your work, and I am here for anything you need. FkpCascais (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are absolutely right about Mohammed-Awal Issah and Mohamed Awal, many thanks for fixing my own error. FkpCascais (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alassane Diomande‎

The article Alassane Diomande‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]