User talk:Xa45b

April 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reliance Industries. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The redirect created at Reliance Global Corporate Security was created as the result of a community deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Global Corporate Security. The subject does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Do not remove the redirect. // Timothy :: talk 14:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sir can we discuss about this topic Xa45b (talk) 14:39, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect created at Reliance Global Corporate Security was created as the result of a community deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Global Corporate Security. The subject does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines. Do not remove the redirect. // Timothy :: talk 14:40, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir this article can be improved but it require time and effort Xa45b (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can we restart the discussion about this topic. I think article need a chance Xa45b (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

can have found some important links related to this article Xa45b (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Today you have attempted to reverse the redirect of a previously deleted article, and then created a draft which was deleted and now have immediately recreated the draft after deletion.

This needs to stop immediately. // Timothy :: talk 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Reliance Global Corporate Security

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Reliance Global Corporate Security, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Xa45b. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir I have not relation with company. I am just a college student who is interested in this article. Xa45b (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So out of the blue, a college student, with no connection to the company, decides to create an account, immediately reverse a community endorsed redirect for an obscure company that has been the target of repeated promotional editing by new accounts, restore the article and previously removed wikilinks, and now start discussions in three locations. And you have no association with the company? Do I have this right?

You also did this pretty quickly for a new account, have you ever edited any other articles before from any other account?

Are you using an IP connected with Reliance Industries? // Timothy :: talk 15:52, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no connection with this company. I just interested in private military company like sadat and blackwater. Yes I edit some article but in anonymous form. Xa45b (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Reliance Global Corporate Security

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Reliance Global Corporate Security requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Global Corporate Security. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 15:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reliance Global Corporate Security (April 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xa45b! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 17:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 18:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Nittin Das per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nittin Das. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]