User talk:Yawkumi

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Yawkumi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Koo Kumi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WMartin74 (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Koo Kumi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Koo Kumi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WMartin74 (talk) 09:35, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koo Kumi has been accepted[edit]

Koo Kumi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at African Union. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 22:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with what is happening in Nigeria or you are a bot? Yawkumi (talk) 23:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm not a bot, and I am at least marginally familiar with what you're talking about. However, you can't reasonably think it was even somewhat appropriate to insert that statement into the lead of the article. Not only is not neutral, but it's largely opinion, and it's totally out of place in that paragraph. You were obviously intending to make a point, and it was definitely vandalism- it wasn't really meant to be a constructive contribution. That aside, addition of properly sourced information is fine, with neutral wording. You've been around long enough to know that was inappropriate, and if it was meant to do more than make a point in some way, it certainly didn't follow our polices. Anything that starts out with "The African Union is a useless organization..." is not a serious contribution. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 23:29, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Symmachus Auxiliarus: Could you please check Yawkumi's recent edits for similar edits? I just reverted one myself. I have to log out imminently or I would do it myself. Yawkuli, your edits violate WP:NPOV and are disruptive. Please stop now.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:32, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: No problem. I've just done so, and they seem to have already been rightly reverted. Going to ping @WeifengYang: since they also reverted a few of them, and so that they're aware of this conversation. Yawkumi, I'm not an administrator, so take this with a grain of salt, and as helpful advice from one Wikipedia user to another. All of those contributions can reasonably be considered vandalism. At the very least, it's disruptive editing in order to make a WP:POINT. Most people would be blocked immediately to prevent further disruption, but instead, consider this a formal warning. Doing something like this again will result in either a WP:NOTHERE or WP:CIR block. Probably the former, because I think you know better than this. Discuss serious changes on the talk page, if you want to argue that this material should be included. But this is not a good look. Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Koo Kumi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Koo Kumi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. →Enock4seth ^(talk) 09:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP Address Blocked[edit]

{{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 154.160.22.76.

thank you, regards Yawkumi (talk) 06:04, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]