User talk:Zachary281

October 2021[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Eva Golinger, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. L'Oiseau Lybre (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Sea Cow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Knight—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Sea Cow (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry. It will not happen again, by the way I have a question, how do you verify an account? Zachary281 (talk) 14:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zachary, you don't need to verify you account. AdrianHObradors (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do you get that Red Warning And That twinkle and what are they exactly in the fist place? Zachary281 (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zachary. I am not sure what you mean by the red warning, I'm sorry. If you mean for example the one you have on your page by L'Oiseau Lybre, those are done through templates. There are many kind of templates, some of which help editors perform common tasks, like warning users that have made unconstructive edits. You can see those templates here: WP:WARN2. To learn more about templates you can check H:TQG. You don't need to worry about that for now though, but it is nice information to have once you have more experience editing Wikipedia. Let me know if there is anything I can help you with, and I hope you make some great additions to the wiki! (you can tag me using the '@' symbol, that way I get a notification and I will see your message) Have a nice day! AdrianHObradors (talk) 11:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and forgot the other part. Twinkle is a tool that helps editors in some different ways, one of those is having the templates on quick reach. It is activated through the preferences, but I would advice you to have more experience before getting onto that. AdrianHObradors (talk) 11:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Le Marteau. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eva Golinger, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Le Marteau (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Mxtt.prior. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Knights of the Round Table because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Mxtt.prior (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello Zachary281 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Knights of the Round Table, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! AdrianHObradors (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You tried to leave a message on my talk page but it messed up the formatting. Use "New Section" at the top to leave me a message if you want. AdrianHObradors (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Careful Zach you don't end up blocking yourself! -- AdrianHObradors (talk) 22:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm TheTerrificTurtwig. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moons of Jupiter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TheTerrificTurtwig (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. I am reaching out to NASA about the accurate number of Jupiter Moons! I will change it once I get the accurate number back! Zachary281 (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Even if your silly story was true, it still doesn't justify repeated random changes. TheTerrificTurtwig (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok. reset it. Zachary281 (talk) 15:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicken nugget. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zachary281[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zachary281 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 14:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 14:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]