User talk:Zacrom
Welcome![edit]
Hi Zacrom! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Shashanka Hazra (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
September 2022[edit]
Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bengalis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hinduism in Bangladesh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Islam in Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bangladeshi diaspora. Worldbruce (talk) 05:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SpencerT•C 10:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bengalis.
You have just completed a block, but then resumed unsourced changes, future blocks will be longer or even indefinite - Arjayay (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hinduism in Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 13:57, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 11:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.