User talk:Zzz@tkz

Hey yall, this is section of wikipedia is dedicated to mwa...arn't I awsome?

Thanks for experimenting with the page Michael Jordan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Syrthiss 14:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You linked an article that was a recreation of an article that had gone through the deletion process...and it has been speedy deleted. Since it has been deleted, it didn't need to be linked in Michael Jordan. However, you have my apologies for using a vandalism template on you. I failed to assume good faith that you were not the original creator of the swish article and assumed that you were recreating it to vandalize. --Syrthiss 15:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW - I saw that your images Image:Fetch.png and Image:Luaplayer.png were marked with {{don't know}}, and would end up being deleted if the license wasn't corrected. I contacted the maintainers of luaplayer.org and they released the images under {{GFDL}}, so they can stay. If you need help deciding on what license to put on uploaded images, feel free to contact either me or the help desk. --Syrthiss 17:54, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Acokgo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Acokgo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 05:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lewisnreed.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lewisnreed.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:57, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lua Player

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lua Player, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lua Player for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lua Player is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lua Player until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Luaplayer.png

The file File:Luaplayer.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]