Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Charmed/archive1

I believe this is a concise, eloquently-written article which fully covers the topic at hand.Moonmirror 06:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object - Large part of the article is filled with rather useless syndication notices and DVD release dates, while leaving more serious topics untouched. The main characters are mentioned, but little is told about them. Who were the writers/directors? How was the show valued by viewers during the course of the show? What about the fan base (a magazine is mentioned)? There are several sub-articles (see box at the bottom) that are hardly or not treated in the main article. Also, the article seems poorly referenced. Jeronimo 06:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. Syndication section is too listy, needs converting to prose. Not very well referenced either, also needs copy-edit and general cleanup. — Wackymacs 07:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object - Fair use images need rationales. --light darkness^(talk) 02:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object, unfinished fannish, POVish, incomplete. Promising start, but needs a lot of work (give me a month ;) H ig hway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 21:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]