Wikipedia:Featured article review/Association football/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC) [1].

---

Association football

Notified: Raichu, Aplucas0703, Woody, WikiProject Football, WikiProject Sports, 2022-03-29

Review section

I am nominating this featured article for review because the history section is missing events from the late 2000s and 2010s, there are some uncited sections, and some currency concerns. I think there are some parts of this article that are in excellent shape, but this article needs updates. Z1720 (talk) 01:49, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

• Move to FARC; issues remain unaddressed. Hog Farm _Talk 13:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
• Move to FARC no edits to address concerns (t · c) buidhe 13:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

• Delist, issues not addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
• Delist, some editing but not that which would lead to a restoration of FA quality. Hog Farm _Talk 03:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delist. Largely sourced to primary sources, plus some questionable material from low-quality sources (such as the date of 5000 BCE). DrKay (talk) 12:21, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
• Delist No progress towards addressing issues. Z1720 (talk) 03:38, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.