Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes/archive3
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 19:09, 4 August 2012 [1].
List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes[edit]
List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Khanassassin ☪ 11:56, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because a lot of hard work has been put into this list and I believe it meets the criteria now. Khanassassin ☪ 11:56, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "Ed, Edd n Eddy is an award-winning 131-episode animated television series" - is that 131 stand-alone episodes or 131 segments?
- "Segments", but there considered to be episodes. --Khanassassin ☪ 07:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead section seems lacking somewhat. Could more be added about awards, the series end, or its history on CN?
- Added a bit of history and awards info. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 08:23, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The series overview table also looks a little bare. Not sure what you could add, though.
- Added a bit of DVD release dates, similar style as in List of Family Guy episodes. So, done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 09:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Does the sixth season really need its own article?
- I don't want it to be a black sheep. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 09:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The Big Picture Show is wikilinked to itself.
- Not anymore. Done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 07:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No production codes for the specials?
- Sadly, there not listed anywhere. They are at TVRage, but that page is unreliable black-listed on Wikipedia. --Khanassassin ☪ 07:47, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:FLCR requires that a featured list be well-illustrated and include images.
- Done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 09:52, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Paper Luigi T • C 20:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice work. I also touched up a few things like hyphens, commas, etc. just now. The last sentence of the intro doesn't seem to fit in with the rest of the paragraph, though, but that's all I noticed. As for the production codes, where did you find the ones for the other episodes? Paper Luigi T • C 20:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You can find it in the "General" sources: The Addic7ed source. It has been named as a reliable source recently at a discussion at the talk pag of WikiProject Television. :) The last sentence isn't really needed, but is not a real problem either. --Khanassassin ☪ 20:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How about Epguides.com as a source for the other PCs? I checked out TVRage and they seem to match. Paper Luigi T • C 20:50, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You can find it in the "General" sources: The Addic7ed source. It has been named as a reliable source recently at a discussion at the talk pag of WikiProject Television. :) The last sentence isn't really needed, but is not a real problem either. --Khanassassin ☪ 20:14, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- One more thing, the lead closely mirrors the one on the main EEnE page. Think you could re-word it a bit so it doesn't look blatantly copied? Paper Luigi T • C 21:01, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added the Epguide source and codes. I also changed the lead slightly; Not perfect, but it's the best I can do. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 16:36, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Great. Ok, a few more things I noticed:
- The article could use an external links section.
- "All specials written by..." could those names be incorporated into the table?
- The series overview table says that S3 has 25 episodes, but I count 26.
- It also says that S4 has 25 episodes, but I count 24.
Paper Luigi T • C 19:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. The episode-count was my mistake, sorry. Taken care of. I don't know if including the writers' names in the Specials table would be the best idea, as the writers are the same for each episode. :/ - They could be added, but maybe not the best idea. :) Totally forgot about the external links, sorry. Added. So... Done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 15:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good. No further comments. I support. Paper Luigi T • C 21:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi. The episode-count was my mistake, sorry. Taken care of. I don't know if including the writers' names in the Specials table would be the best idea, as the writers are the same for each episode. :/ - They could be added, but maybe not the best idea. :) Totally forgot about the external links, sorry. Added. So... Done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 15:36, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments – I've been hard on certain issues with this list before, and don't want the nominator to feel like I'm on their case too much, so I'm leaving others to check for close paraphrasing/plagarism. Please, someone check the film summary while this is here; typing a few random bits into Google should be sufficient for our purposes. Now that that's addressed...
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 17:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Alt text for the lead image would be nice.
|
Let it be noted that I checked a couple of short passages from the movie summary, which was the area I was most concerned about. Aside from a couple of Wikipedia mirror sites I'm not concerned about, there were no matches with other sites. I know I said I'd let someone else do it, but since no one did a check I wanted to get that out of the way, and am happy that no issues were detected. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Oppose
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comment: Per WP:TVLEAD, "It is not recommended that the phrase "award-winning" be used in the first sentence of the lead: it provides insufficient context to the reader, and subsequent paragraphs in the lead can detail the major awards or nominations received by the television show." TRLIJC19 (talk) 07:32, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 11:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Support. Great work! TBrandley 16:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My comments:
- "Antonucci decided to produce ... would be produced" - avoid using the same verb twice in one sentence.
- Done. :) --Khanassassin ☪ 16:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "go in his own direction" - feels a bit too informal, might be just me
- Meh, seems good to me... not sure what the replacement could be, though. --Khanassassin ☪ 16:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "A first full to seasons" - what does this mean? Is it an industry term for DVD releases? Consider replacing with a less specialized term
- Sorry, should have been "full first two". :) --Khanassassin ☪ 16:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Have you considered using the transclusion trick found in List of Bleach episodes to generate episode name tables by transcluding the season pages? It might save time down the line when you're improving the season pages. Also, it's really cool.
- I agree it's very cool, however, a user in the previous FLC noted that the season lists are not featured, meaning they can not be transcluded... sadly. :/ --Khanassassin ☪ 16:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not know that. I don't see that listed anywhere in the FL criteria... Well, it looks like you've had that setup in the past so it should not be difficult to revive it if/when you get the individual season lists up to FL. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree it's very cool, however, a user in the previous FLC noted that the season lists are not featured, meaning they can not be transcluded... sadly. :/ --Khanassassin ☪ 16:24, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, Axem Titanium (talk) 15:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:55, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.