Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves recipients (1945)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:47, 24 October 2011 [1].
List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves recipients (1945)[edit]
List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves recipients (1945) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this as the last of the five Oak Leaves lists for featured list because I feel this list may meet the criteria already. The number of read links is less than 15% and within the limit of what I have seen to be acceptable here. Due to the few number of recipients in the years 1940 and 1941 the two years had to be merged into one list. Now completed the five lists 1940–1941 (currently a featured list), 1942 (currently a featured list), 1943 (currently a featured list), 1944 (currently a featured list) and 1945 will comprise all of the generally accepted 882 recipients of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves. I welcome any constructive feedback. Thanks in advance. MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support The Rambling Man (talk) 17:42, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 17:13, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments – Reviewed through most of the notes; will look at the rest later.
|
Support As the last in a long series of similar articles, most of my concerns together with what has been recorded above have been addressed and I can see no reason not to support. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:21, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, but wouldn't it be better to use a diff symbol than a question mark, as it looks like the names are in questioned, maybe even ^ or others
– HonorTheKing (talk) 16:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.