Help desk
< March 26	<< Feb \| March \| Apr >>	March 28 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

March 27[edit]

list of character encodings[edit]

Where is our list of &...; codes? Things like & n b s p ;. — kwami (talk) 02:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are not merely our. See List of XML and HTML character entity references. PrimeHunter (talk) 02:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! No wonder I couldn't figure out [ and ]. — kwami (talk) 02:49, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with [ and ] are usually in url's. For that, see meta:Help:URL#URLs in external links. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

plutonium toxicity[edit]

Hi there!

I just read the plutonium article in English - clearly there are important facts left out in terms of plutonium toxicity. These I would like to add. How can I do that? It seems that there is some editing lock on it?

Best Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.156.206.241 (talk) 02:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plutonium is semi-protected and can only be edited by autoconfirmed users. You can post suggestions to Talk:Plutonium and use {{edit semi-protected}}. It's a featured article covering many aspects of plutonium. I'm not sure the toxicity section should be longer. PrimeHunter (talk) 03:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the protecting admin to perhaps try removing the protection - and they did. So, as of now, it can be edited by anyone. Chzz ► 13:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chess Illusion[edit]

Is Chess Illusion a candidate for Speedy Deletion? Even though it gives a 1994 book as a reference, the website says that it is a new invention (WP:MADEUP). The video on the blog is by a user with the same username as the editor of the article, and he identifies himself as "Carlos", the inventor and manufacturer of the game, thus a wp:coi. (Also a single-purpose account.) The editor has removed the PROD tag. There are also questions about notability, etc. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 03:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest an WP:AFD instead, it doesn't look like a hoax, but it also is doubtful it has notability. I don't think it qualifies for a notability CSD, and as the prod has been challenged, AfD is required. (though you never know, a CSD may get through) Monty ₈₄₅ 03:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also XLinkBot reverted some edits, saying that the blog in the external links is one on its list to not be allowed. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 03:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creating SR Page[edit]

I'd like to create a new, "Scorpia Rising" page, in place of the current redirect. Would I simply edit the "Scorpia Rising" redirect page? Also, considering information, such as the synopsis, would be provided precisely from my own knowledge & observations drawn directly from the novel in question (Scorpia Rissing), how would I go about making the necessary citation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatoranaki (talk • contribs) 06:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot cite yourself as a reference. The article must be based upon independent reliable sources. It may be appropriate to have a short plot-summary, and that is one place where you don't need another source - your own (well-worded, neutral, brief) summary of the plot is acceptable. But all articles need to be based upon verifiable sources - such as newspaper articles that discuss the book. Please read WP:FIRST. Chzz ► 06:45, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why are fully capitalized words not allowed in Wikipedia articles?[edit]

For the article on the website "OMGPOP", the title is shown as "Omgpop". I changed all the "Omgpop"'s to "OMGPOP" but someone told me not to do that and changed it back to "Omgpop".

The website is OMGPOP, not "Omgpop". If you will not change it then the article is incorrect as the name of the website is not spelled correctly, and therefore an error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.44.10 (talk) 06:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss that on the article's talk page. OMGPOP is also a redirect to Omgpop, that should respond your first lines. --Diego Grez (talk) 06:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons for Omgpop over OMGPOP are presented here. Kayau Voting IS evil 06:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both answers do not answer my title question. "Why are fully capitalized words not allowed in Wikipedia articles?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.44.10 (talk) 06:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are "allowed". There is no technical reason why we cannot have all-cap names; indeed, we do for e.g. DNA, AC/DC, S.H.E and NASA - but those are more specific acronyms. We generally avoid all caps because it can sound like "shouting" and give undue emphasis - and we must keep a neutral point-of-view.

In that specific case, please note that it was already discussed previously, in January this year, in the section "Move?" - where 3 people directly opposed it and, apart from the nominator, nobody supported. Whilst I agree that the website's self-styled name is in all capitals, the convention generally is NOT to capitalise them - see MOS:ALLCAPS and MOS:TM#General rules.

However - if, after considering the previous discussion, you still think it is wrong (in this case) then please do start a fresh discussion - in Talk:Omgpop. There are instructions in WP:RM, or if you need help with it, please ask. Chzz ► 06:40, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Fully capitalised names are allowed in articles if that format is the standard format for an acronym or an initialism - for example, NATO or OPEC. However, the consensus seems to be that the capitalisation of Omgpop is a trademark device, in which case our guideline on formatting of trademarks says it should not be fully capitalised. We do not, for example, write Dell as DELL, even though that is how the name appears in their trademark. Gandalf61 (talk) 06:46, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If a companies title is in all caps, then when they market their company/product, they will do so with the name in Capital letters.

Anyways, "Omgpop" was just an example. I still feel this is unnecessary but I have no control over the capitalization of letters/words since if I do change titles to all capital letters then someone will just revert the letters back to lowercase =/. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.44.10 (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In those cases, you should start a discussion on the talk page of the article. But, if many other editors thinks that the name shouldn't be in all-capitals, then please respect that consensus. Everyone has their own opinions on style matters, which is why we discuss things, and try to come to an agreement.

And if you think that the guideline itself is wrong, you could discuss that too - on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style - but, as it explains at the top, please check prior discussions first. Cheers, Chzz ► 07:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have total respect for peoples opinions. When someone says something which is considered or can be classified as "negative", then I respond with my thoughts on their "negativeness" with words which support my thoughts.

I am not talking specifically about "Omgpop" (although I mentioned it a few times), but rather words not being capitalized in general.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.44.10 (talk • contribs) 07:21, 27 March 2011

When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured to the right.

We avoid the caps mostly because it can give undue emphasis - and it can make an article look "spammy". Consider which looks more encyclopaedic; for example,

CHZZ SAUSAGE COMPANY was established in 1878. CHZZ SAUSAGE COMPANY produce CHZZ SPICY SAUSAGE, CHZZ WILD BOAR SAUSAGE and CHZZ HOT DOGS. There are currently 12 people working for CHZZ SAUSAGE COMPANY.

Whilst my company may well write its name and the product names with all caps, it isn't a very Encyclopaedic tone.Note, this 'company' is entirely fictitious Chzz ► 07:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, when I said product I did not mean the products of the company. I just meant the company name...sorry for the confusion.

If the company feels that their title should be capitalized as that is how they market their company, are you going to allow capital letters (in that situation), or are you going to tell the actual company what I am being told.

Is this capitalization "rule" new? When I say new, I mean within the past few months or so. If I am not mistaken the "Omgpop" page used to be "OMGPOP", as well as some other pages, but I may be thinking of something different and this rule may have always been in affect (since my time on Wikipedia).

--99.141.44.10 (talk) 08:02, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Andrew[reply]

The Manual of Style states - with regards to Trademark, which "include words and short phrases used by organizations to identify themselves"...

Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official":
- avoid: REALTOR®, TIME, KISS
- instead, use: Realtor, Time, Kiss

--From MOS:TM#General_rules. Chzz ► 13:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To justify full capitalisation of Omgpop, I think you will have to show that it is an initialism. We fully capitalise IBM and IKEA because they are initialisms; we do not fully capitalise Dell or Zanussi, even thought these companies write their company name in capitals in their logo. The Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) guideline is not new - it has been a Wikipedia guideline for at least 5 years. Gandalf61 (talk) 13:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request Letter[edit]

May the LORD be with you all! Hello GMA, I am a Professional worker here in abroad and my family was a fans of GMA since I got married. But when my 2nd daughter was delivered last 1998, we (my wife and I) notice that she has difficulty in hearing as well as in speech. Then I decided to bring her on a specialist in ENT. Hence, the result was profound hearing loss. Meaning she can not hear anymore. But my wife and I decided to bring her in a Special School here in Pasay School for Deaf. And now she is she improving in her communicationto other person that can do the Sign Langauge Method. She already now going to 13 years old and I am thinking " How can she appreciate music if she can only read?". "How can she wacth and understand TV if there is no WORDS Written on screen?". I am doing my best to help my 2nd daughter improved her knowledge in communication. And I am suggesting from your good company to help us as well as other deaf person to understand more of your GMA programs. I am suggesting that if "YOU (GMA) CAN PUT WORDS UNDERNEATH YOUR TV SCREEN ALL PROGRAMS YOU ARE SHOWING" It will help not only the Normal but also the the DEAF. Thank you and GOD bless your company

Father, Ernan Renan D. Relunia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.101.181.36 (talk) 07:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Wikipedia help desk - it is not a company. We do not make television programmes.

This if for help with editing Wikipedia.

So I think you are asking in the wrong place. Sorry. Chzz ► 07:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your appeal seems to be addressed to GMA, which is not us. I am guessing that you found the Wikipedia article GMA. That article contains a link to the GMA corporate site, which may tell you how you can contact them. --ColinFine (talk) 22:09, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text[edit]

I have been updating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Freuchen

There is a problem called "Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text" in the ref list.

I think I have fixed the problem but the error still exists in the ref list. Is there a way to make wikipedia re-survey the ref list for a certain article, or otherwise remove this error notice which is no longer correct, as I have deleted the reference which caused this error? Roger491127 (talk) 10:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A bot fixed the error with this diff. Dismas|^(talk) 10:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Roger491127 (talk) 10:27, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The error message shows the help page at Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text. Unfortunately, this message is one where wikilinks don't work. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 13:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried reading the page "Help:Cite errors/Cite error references no text" but it said nothing about how to get rid of the error message after fixing the problem. Maybe it should enhanced to include how to run a bot to renew the ref list after fixing the problem. Roger491127 (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your first effort did not fix the problem. The bot fixed the problem and the message automatically disappeared. No refresh is needed. Please leave discussion on the help talk if the help page needs enhancement. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 18:20, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing cancelled[edit]

Good morning from Europe,

Why did you erase the crucial editing I made in the article about JFK, and mainly about his assassination ? Rather surprising. Kind regards, Johan F. Hel Guedj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quantx (talk • contribs) 12:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits were reverted because they were original research. None of the information you added was sourced to any reliable sources. You should always add reliable sources when you add information to an article, especially when it is a controversial subject. GB fan (talk) 12:55, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and again. Chzz ► 13:24, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source[edit]

Thank you for your reply which is questionable to say the least. What is a reliable source ? A government commission whose conclusions are notoriously flawed and misleading ? You should ask yourself a very simple question : is it an acceptable thesis to say two brothers, most prominent figures of the most powerful country in the world, have been assassinated by TWO lone nuts four years apart ? general de Gaulle famously replied to the US ambassador announcing him JFK had been killed by a lone shooter : "Not to me, monsieur l'ambassadeur, please, not to me. I beg to differ" If you were cognoscenti in roman history, you would know Caesar is never been assassinated by a lone nut. There is no such thing at the head of the state. I'm displeased to see Wikipedia propagating pure propaganda about this, without leaving space to knowledged contradictors, and describiung them as "conspiracy theorists". Poorly thought out. Kind regards, JFHG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quantx (talk • contribs) 15:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If, for example, there was an article in the New York Times supporting your claims - then you could cite that. Otherwise, it is original research - which Wikipedia does not do. We don't synthesize information - we only publish facts that can be verified. See WP:NPOV and WP:RS.

If you wish to discuss it further, then it would be best to start a new section on the article talk page, Talk:John_F._Kennedy_assassination - but you will have to provide references that support any claims. Chzz ► 15:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You must be joking. Do you know how many official reports (including from the HSCA in 1978) official conclude there was a conspiracy ? Wikipedia author seems to present HSCA conclusions as subject to caution , which they're not. Did you review the official videos of the HSCA sessions ? I did. Members of the commission did conclude there was a conspiracy, beyond any doubt. Its seems this has not reached Wikipedia pages. Well, maybe Neil Armstrong has not landed on the moon either, who knows ? It must be Oswald instead. ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quantx (talk • contribs) 16:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia shouldn't take sides and present one of the theories as the absolute truth. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories mentions many theories. See also United States House Select Committee on Assassinations#Conclusions regarding the JFK assassination. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting in table on numeric culumn with decimal point[edit]

How do I sort properly a table with N/A values (not available)?

Header text	Header text
Row 1	0
Row 2	100
Row 3	N/A
Row 4	2.1
Row 5	200

The sort button sorts in alpha order, instead of numerical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michalp (talk • contribs) 16:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When creating sortable tables, there can be issues with how a column sorts. See Help:Sorting for a complete overview.

Columns that mix alpha and numerical data will sort alphabetically— this can be resolved by using {{nts}}.
When using general text with and without wikilinks, use {{sort}}.
To sort dates, use {{dts}}.
For sorting names in the format last, first use {{sortname}}. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 17:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) same answer, more or less, but an example...

If you must do it, use {{Nts}} around all the number fields. (The reasons are complicated; there is some help at m:Help:Sorting)

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Header text !! Header text
|-
| Row 1 || {{Nts|0}}
|-
| Row 2 || {{Nts|100}}
|-
| Row 3 || N/A
|-
| Row 4 || {{Nts|2.1}}
|-
| Row 5 || {{Nts|200}}
|}

Header text	Header text
Row 1	0
Row 2	100
Row 3	N/A
Row 4	2.1
Row 5	200

Chzz ► 17:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

QUERY - Aren't changes on a page supposed to be reported?[edit]

Hi! I use Wikipedia very often and thought for sure that a policy of yours was to add in a "page history" page that showed any changes to an article and by whom for that page?

I ask because your page on Summation had early in its write-up an image of an example of Induction ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/5/d/1/5d1ba66a7aca2c258985399ff22410ef.png ) ... odd that that very image wasn't there just a few days ago for another image that was the exact same equation but in different form.

I looked for the history of why and who changed that image because its odd I been coincidently writing a paper on the example of Induction used of the original image and linking this very page for that image and sending that paper to leading Set Theory specialists and other university piers and that image was very helpfull in dealing with the issues the paper regarded. Now suddenly someone changed the image to a different example of Induction and I find the timing very peculiar. It doesn't change anything about my paper except for it to be easier to understand for anyone needing to see the example of Induction I was using from here but is now changed. I only linked to the page on Summation.

Anyways, how did that image change on the Summation page without anyone ever knowing it happened in the pages history??

Thankyou ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by G2thef (talk • contribs) 17:59, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Summation

That equation is not an image as such, but is generated when you read the article by the code;

<math>\sum_{i=1}^ni = \frac{1}{2}n(n+1)</math>

The history shows that it was changed with this edit, on 25 March 2011, by an IP user 89.241.202.49 (talk · contribs).

These formulae use a version of LaTeX markup; there is help at Help:Displaying a formula. If you need specific help fixing a formula, just ask.

I have no clue if their edit is good or bad; if it is wrong, please fix it. Thanks, Chzz ► 18:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The current state of the article shows an equation that matches the image referred to by the OP. The previous state (before March 25) showed a different equation. The OP apparently believes that at one time, instead of a code representation in the article, there was an actual image, and the image apparently was removed. I'm not sure what the OP bases that assumption on, but I suppose he could replace the code with the image. I have this vague recollection of deja vu, but maybe it's about some other article. In any event, because this is definitely not my field, perhaps the best way to go about any change is to raise it on the Talk page of the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loool, ok well ya so I've learned that someone made a change but did not put it up on the Talk page of the article ... so isn't that not allowed on Wikipedia? I thought you hadto make a comment on the Talk Page about what changes you are making before making them??? I just find it peculiar when the image that was originally there was an image I was using for a deep paper about Set Theory I sent to some prestigous math scholars.

G2thef (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is no need to discuss every change on talk pages - only if you think the change might be controversial, or if you are unsure. We encourage editors to be bold.

A useful concept is bold-revert-discuss - ie, if you think something needs changing, just go ahead. If somebody objects, they can just 'undo' it. As long as, at that point, you discuss the change - and don't fight over it - then all is well.

On the other hand, if you suggest an edit on the talk page before doing it, it could take weeks to get any answer.

As noted - that doesn't apply to controversial edits. But for an article of this type - sure. Please, go ahead and edit.

If you have specific questions about maths though - and, indeed, if you are interested in getting more involved - take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics, and ask away on their talk page, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Cheers, Chzz ► 18:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whether source code like <math>\sum_{i=1}^ni = \frac{1}{2}n(n+1)</math> renders as an image or text can depend on both the precise formula and the Math settings under "Appearance" at Special:Preferences.

<math>\sum_{i=1}^ni = \frac{1}{2}n(n+1)</math> renders as:

$\sum _{i=1}^{n}i={\frac {1}{2}}n(n+1)$

<math>\sum_{i=1}^ni = \frac{1}{2}n(n+1) \,\!</math> renders as:

$\sum _{i=1}^{n}i={\frac {1}{2}}n(n+1)\,\!$

See more at Help:Displaying a formula. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a hung list without numbers or bullets[edit]

At the end of Malvern, Worcestershire#Post dissolution I have put a list of poets. I would like to indent each name, but have not been able to figure out usage of &nbsp. I would prefer not to number them, or to put bullets, because this would create imbalance with other material that might be displayed as list. Also, I will want to put in corresponding lists of painters, musicians. Is what I have done ok as regards general WK style? Michael P. Barnett (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At WP, we generally shy away from using HTML coding like your use of line breaks. If you want to indent something, you can put a colon at the beginning of each new line like I have done with this response. Dismas|^(talk) 18:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

coat of arms - a city in South America[edit]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Santiago de Guayaquil has the traditional coat of arms, the image is not in display in the your webpages. Can I send you that coat of arms (.jpg file)?

Thanks for your kind attention to my email.

Kind regards,

V —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.236.252.234 (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the copyright status of the file. If it is in the public domain, it may be uploaded to Commons; if not (and the copyright holders do not release it under a suitable licence) it may be possible to upload it to Wikipedia under a fair use rationale. Once it has been uploaded to either Commons or Wikipedia, it can then be inserted into an article.

In order to upload it, you would need to register an account - which has other advantages too.

Please look at the image tutorial for further information. --ColinFine (talk) 23:11, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

small text[edit]

Resolved

The text on wikipedia has become very small, how can I alter this? Off2riorob (talk) 20:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably something in your browser. If it's Firefox, try "View, Zoom, Reset". For Internet Explorer, maybe "View", "Text-size", "Medium".

Failing that, try turning off and back on again - that fixes most things. Unless it's something set in your skin... is it the same logged-out as logged-in? Chzz ► 20:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IE zoom is in the bottom right. Sumsum2010·T·C 20:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try Ctrl+0 (for IE, don't use the numeric keypad). ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 20:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- phew, thanks, firefox - zoom - reset. Many thanks . Off2riorob (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit drop down box stuck[edit]

At the bottom of the page in edit mode is a drop down box enabling editors to choose between Latin, Cyrillic, Arabic, Greek, Hebrew, symbols, Wiki markup, IPA etc. It's always worked fine for me, until recently.

Now, when I log in from work, it's stuck on Symbols and no matter what other choices I click on, it won't move. When I log in from home, it's stuck on Cyrillic.

But when I log out and then go into edit mode, it's fine. Full functionality.

So it seems to be an issue with my user account. Yet I can't see that this is an optional feature that I can turn on or off, or in any way adjust.

Suggestions would be appreciated. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 22:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are sometimes conflicts between features in some circumstances. Have you enabled anything under Gadgets at Special:Preferences? What is your browser and skin? Try to clear your entire cache and to change skin (not permanently, just to see whether it's the same in other skins). PrimeHunter (talk) 22:51, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I get the same problem (and others) if I enable the advanced editing toolbar in preferences. —teb728 t c 22:57, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have it enabled and haven't noticed problems. What is your browser and skin? PrimeHunter (talk) 23:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mine are IE8 and Vector. —teb728 t c 23:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It works for me with IE8 and Vector. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I've changed my skin from Monobook to Modern (and I think I'll keep it, I prefer it to the old one). I've bypassed my cache, and also cleared my cache. I've logged out and in again. The problem is still there. I'm using IE8 as far as I know (I'm at work). Any more ideas? -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 02:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now I've gone back to Monobook skin (I didn't like Modern as much as I thought I did). Still the same original problem persists, both at work and at home, but only when I'm logged in. Anyone? -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 01:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is the same issue but it is also about drop down menus, so see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#"User" and "Page" menus not dropping down in MonoBook.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]