Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2011 May 24

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 23 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 25 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 24[edit]

Fake Wikipedia Content Posting on Website[edit]

This website attributes the information to Wikipedia However, a check with with all possible titles showed up no such page on Wikipedia. Moreover, the fake page potentially does not conform to Wikipedia policies for pages on this topic. What can we do about it?--Lionratz (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interestingly, it credits the editors who wrote the Garden of Heaven article, which seems to be about an unrelated film. doomgaze (talk) 00:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps they copied from http://asianmediawiki.com/You_Dance_With_The_Summer (blacklisted so not linked) and thought it was a part of Wikipedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:37, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would suggest emailing them to let them know about their error. If they don't respond, you can ask the Wikimedia Foundation or some OTRS person to take further action. - 194.60.106.17 (talk) 06:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do we upload an image to the Anamorphosis page, in the "Anamorphosis in Popular Culture" section?[edit]

This is our own photograph, taken of our own anamorphic art. Lots of upload instructions are out there, but none seems appropriate our page view. Please help with clear, concise directions. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myrna Hoffman (talkcontribs) 01:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You must first be an Autoconfirmed user in order to upload. For most users, your account must be four days old and have made at least 10 edits. Please see WP:AUTOCONFIRM for more information. Tiggerjay (talk) 03:30, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Myrna Hoffman, just expanding on the tip Tiggerjay added. In addition to being autoconfirmed (check his link above), you would use the upload tool on the left side of the Wikipedia page. With that in mind, you should also be aware of a few following things. (1) Ensure that any action on that page cannot be deemed a conflict of interests or blatant or promotional advertising of your work. (2) Ensure you are willing to release the image in the public domain, or under a license suited for uploading it to Wikipedia (or it will be deleted). This[1] is the relevant section of rules and guidelines you need to understand. (3) check Wikipedia Help on how to include images on an article (or check how it's done on other articles).
Remember, you can always use the Wikipedia Sandbox to do test edits to ensure you get it right before you change an actual article. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 03:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You can also request that your account be given CONFIRMED status, which will enable you to upload your file once those permissions are provided, please see WP:PERM for more information. Tiggerjay (talk) 17:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong link[edit]

Hi there,

I regularly watch and maintain the following page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liang_Style_Baguazhang

One of the names on that page "Wang Tong" (top section) links to another wikipedia page that is totally unrelated to it.

I couldn't figure out how to fix the error. Maybe you can give me some hints on how to do it.

Thanks and regards,

Gerard Banhidi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerardbagua66 (talkcontribs) 02:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem like there is an article about the correct Wang Tong. The best fix might simply be to de-link the name, by removing the [[ and ]] from around it. 24.177.120.138 (talk) 03:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can be fixed using Wang Tong rather than Wang Tong I've made that change for you - but you may wish to find and/or create the correct target page EdwardLane (talk) 06:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Troubles Template has possible bad links?[edit]

Hello, I've never been to the help desk before - It was suggested I talk to you folks here- hope this is where I'm meant to be posting my query :)

Anyway the question is 'should the template be changed?' and if so 'where should I be asking?'.

Here's the issue :)

I was on a talk page trying to find more editting guidelines for how to edit things relating to the troubles - in case there were NPOV guildlines and saw the template {{Troubles restriction}} which contains this text

The content of the Troubles restriction template (I didn't like to paste it without nowiki tags)[edit]

Consensus The article Queen Elizabeth II's visit to the Republic of Ireland, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2007 Arbitration case, and amended by community consensus in October 2008 and November 2009. The current restrictions are:

  • All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
  • All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related.
         o Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty
  • Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. You may also wish to review the arbitration case page. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

End content of the Troubles restriction template[edit]

So I followed the link active arbitration remedies above. The page I arrived at is not very user friendly - but said to leave comments on the talk page. I did so asking if any of it could be archived.

I gather now that it was already an "archive" page - but I don't think the template spelled that out very well. Anyway I was asked to revert my edit, (which I have done).

The talk page was just off the in the news section - so 4 well meaning clicks from the main page to a very obscure arbitration archive which didn't give any useful info to the new(ish) wikipedian like myself.

I think the template needs better wording.

Thanks EdwardLane (talk) 06:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdwardLane. Try the article's talk page. I made the same mistake not too long ago by reading too quickly. The template is pointing you to the Arb page if you wish to research it, and to the talk page (of the article that has the template/note) to leave a comment. Key word in the msg is " discuss it here on this talk page first." Hope that helps. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 06:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Robert, I understand that I can ask questions about the article on the talk page for the article :)
But if I want to understand the 'active arbitration procedure' that (as it turns out was clearly not 'actively' discussing how to arbitrate NPOV issues related to the troubles) then surely I click the link and end up on the arb page (which says don't edit this unless you want to get embroiled in the arbitration - comment on that talk page)
What I think I'm suggesting is some different template for arbitrations that are closed - compared to arbs that are active. So the close arb template says 'the issues in this article are covered under the consensus that was reached in an arb procedure - you can only do this that and the other with this article, if you really want to go back and look at the lengthy discussion that resulted in these rules look here, if you see someone breaking it or if you think those rules are out of date or otherwise rubbish - talk to the arb people here)
Oh and if you do end on that closed arb page - then the text at the top of that should not suggest you edit that arb talk page (that should I think just be for active arbitrations)
something like that anyway - but I was wondering where I ought to suggest that :)

EdwardLane (talk) 07:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the notice, switching two sentences round. Does that make it clearer? -- John of Reading (talk) 08:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John,
I understand I can suggest changes to the Template here,and I will now that I understand better what the various aspects of my question were (but thanks for the bold sentence switch which does improve one of the issues slightly).
But where do I go to suggest a new template toggle? So instead of writing {{Troubles restriction}} Someone can write {{Troubles restriction|arbitration=active}} or {{Troubles restriction|arbitration=complete}} and the text displayed has different content based on that toggle? Or am I meant to boldly create such a thing? I don't know how.


And where do I go to suggest an edit be made to the arbitration page to change the text and remove the line "Comments are very welcome on the Talk page, and will be read, in full" and replace it with "Comments were made on the Talk page, and were read, in full during the arbitration process which is now closed" - and also address the line "Once the case is closed, editors ..." which should probably say "Now that the case is closed, editors ..." (it doesn't look like this is the correct place - but perhaps I'm wrong)?

EdwardLane (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr video to Wikipedia or Commons[edit]

I sometimes use a tool to bring images from Flickr to Commons but am having a hard time figuring out how to bring over a video. I have checked out an essay and a couple help pages but am just not getting it. I know a another user who tried but it looks like it didn't work out either. So if anyone is already knowledgeable in this less used area some pointers would be awesome. We are going for this which is properly licensed and not a capture from television. I grabbed Firefogg but still am being dense.Cptnono (talk) 06:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My semi-random searches threw up this Ref Desk archive and this page at Commons. Any use? I've never used any of these tools. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I can try and upload to a better place for you, maybe you tube? make a comment on the video on flickr if it is not working. Ted Kerwin

Thanks for the links John. I am not able to download the file from Flickr so I tried a program to "grab" it. Ran into some errors.
And THANK YOU Ted. If you feel inclined, you can email me the video. My email (also listed in the toolbox ) is thecptnono@gmail.com. Another editor wants to use the video to illustrate a penalty kick. Cptnono (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hard rock band[edit]

how do i create a page for a hard rock band so it looks like the ones already on Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sychosys (talkcontribs) 08:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sychosys (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
For advice on formatting, see Help:Wiki markup. But for an article to exist at all, you need to show that the band is important - see WP:BAND - and you do this by including references to reliable sources such as coverage in mainstream media, to show that other people have decided to write about it. Your choice of user name suggests that you are linked to the band in some way, so you should also look at WP:COI and WP:NOTADVERT. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emmanuella Grace[edit]

Hi guys. I got the message that my article was to be deleted if I did not provide any reliable sources to suport it. I have since found two reliable sources to suport my material. How do I make sure that the page does not get deleted? And how do I remove the tag on my wiki page that say this?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmanuella_Grace

Thank you for your help.

Erik —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eriksolum (talkcontribs) 09:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I left a standard message on your talk page just now explaining that the article was deleted as a copyright violation. I had started a copyedit to see if I could help the article, find some better sources and so on, but then I discovered that you had copied and pasted the text verbatim from her website. You are free to recreate the article with your own writing, but you need to include reliable third party sources—sources that are entirely unconnected to Ms. Grace. The sources you had listed was her own website and a website in the blogosphere that does not appear to have any claim to reliability and which contained an interview and a large quote from her website, i.e., all primary source material, so the sources were not what we are looking for. There are no results in Google Books or News archive, so it may be that she is not currently sufficiently written about to warrant an article at all. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (music) for some of our musician-specific notability standards.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance from someone who isn't at their workplace?[edit]

Could someone, who isn't at their workplace with people possibly looking over their shoulder, please check out the Arianny Celeste article? The infobox is broken and one of the more recent infobox images is of a naked woman. I'd rather not be surprised by that image again while at work. Thanks, Dismas|(talk) 09:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Dismas|(talk) 10:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia photos.[edit]

can I use photos from Wikipedia in my book? if so, who should I acknowldege and cite as source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.84.225 (talk) 10:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you can do this depends on which photos you have in mind; see Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content. You will need to click through to the file page of each photo to see the terms on which it was uploaded. Feel free to post again here with the names of the relevant photos, and someone will be able to give you specific advice. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can anyone help. can I use the photos of the Church Fathers in my book (history of Christianity for college use.) which is about to publish? if so, who should I acknowldge or cite as sources? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.84.225 (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The two pictures in the Church Fathers article are both in the public domain because their copyright has expired. Are those the pictures you mean? For advice on re-using public domain pictures please see here. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disabling and enabling cookies[edit]

Some time ago, I tried to log in to Wikipedia after using Google Chrome (the web browser which is my default browser) and got the message - You need to enable cookies and you have them disabled. I then managed to log in to Wikipedia when I used Safari. However, I would still like to know how one can log enable cookies on Google Chrome. Many thanks in advance for any feedback. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Many thanks for that - that will be useful for further referene. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Lansley's page[edit]

I represent Low Associates mentioned in the Andrew Lansley page. We have been subject to articles in the Telegraph which are at best inaccurate and misleading (contravening the PCC code). When I attempt to change the page giving the true information and citing the relevant part of the company website someone changes it back. This is potentially libellous and commercially damaging77.200.133.69 (talk) 12:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When you edit give reasons for the changes. Denisarona (talk) 12:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article has now been protected because of your edit warring on the page. If you want to make changes, please request them together with a citation to a reliable source on the discussion page Talk:Andrew Lansley. —teb728 t c 12:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note also that we do not tolerate the chilling effect of legal threats here. I have not blocked you; but please read the warning template which I have placed on your talk page. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As you claim to "represent Low Associates" you also have a Conflict of Interest, so should not be editing the section of Lansley's page referring to Low Associates, at all. If you want changes made to that article, please request them, citing a reliable source on the discussion page, as explained above. Arjayay (talk) 07:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question re: Special:NewPages[edit]

Resolved

Do articles created in user subpages then moved to mainspace appear in Special:NewPages, and is this also true of articles created from redirects? If not, is this not a loophole that could be exploited to bypass the new page patrollers? doomgaze (talk) 12:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moves to mainspace and changes of redirects don't appear. For moves, see Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Archive 1#Help with related patrolling: Category:Unreviewed new articles. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:50, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. doomgaze (talk) 01:14, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

main page[edit]

How can I get my wekipedia main page in english?Lobrunello (talk) 13:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may have had trouble in the last hour because of network maintenance. It should be OK now? -- John of Reading (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help please with downloading a biography[edit]

Hello,

Professor Cuno Puempin has a page already in German on Wikipedia. Given his contributions, I believe it would be helpful to have his biography on Wikipedia also in English. I have gone ahead and translated his biography in English but am not able to paste the article on wikipedia although I have followed all directions.

Please find below the translation. Would you be able to download it for me please ? I would be grateful.

Thank you in advance.

Fariba Hashemi, PhD.Fariba Hashemi (talk) 13:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hiding draft article
                                  • Begining of Cuno Puempin's biography*************

Cuno Puempin (Pümpin) (* August 21st, 1939 at Basel) is a Swiss economist, entrepreneur and consultant.

Puempin developed the concept of “Strategic Excellence Positions” (SEP) in the early 1980s. In the 1990s under the name “core competences” and “core capabilities”, this concept received broad acceptance and Puempin was awarded the Swiss Innovation Price for this work. Puempin has published highly recognized books and articles mainly on strategic management. He was marketing and general manager in several companies, as well as member of the board of directors and a private investor.

Content:

1. Early life 2. Career 3. Activities a. Professional b. Scientific 4. Publications 5. See also 6. External links

Background

Cuno Puempin was born as second son of Fritz Puempin (*1901 at Gelterkinden; died July 5th 1972 at Gelterkinden) and Rose Gerster. He is citizen of Gelterkinden.

Career

Puempin went to primary and high-school in the Canton of Basel, Switzerland. In 1955 he started a three years commercial apprenticeship. Later on he started his studies in economics and management at the Universities of Basel and St. Gallen. In 1966 he received his Masters degree as a commercial teacher and in 1968 he obtained his PhD. The title of his doctoral thesis was “Long Range Marketing Planning”.

Activities

a) Professional

Between 1965 and 1967 Puempin was employed in the Corporate Development Department of J.R. Geigy AG (today a part of Novartis). In 1967 he joined the computer company Sperry Univac (today part of Unisys) where he became Vice President Marketing in 1970. In 1970 / 1971 Puempin wrote his professorial thesis (Habilitationsschrift) entitled “Information and Marketing”. In 1972 he became “Privatdozent” (formal lecturer) at the University of St. Gallen and in 1973 he was appointed “Extraordinarius” (Professor and member of the Senate). At the same time Puempin became CEO of the Center of Management at St. Gallen, a foundation related to the University.

In 1977 Puempin founded his own company that specialized on strategy consulting. In the following years most Swiss companies with international operations became his clients. Puempin was also appointed to many board of directors, such as Ernst & Young Switzerland, Ems Chemie Holding AG, Liechtenstein Global Trust (LGT) AG, Metro International AG and member of the international advisory board of the Blackstone Group, New York. As member of the Prince of Liechtenstein Foundation and executive board member of LGT Puempin was closely involved in the international expansion of this Group. Moreover Puempin was board member of several institutes at the University of St. Gallen, including the Chairman of the Institute of Management.

Since the 1970s Puempin is a well-known lecturer at international congresses and seminars such as the World Economic Forum, the ISC in St. Gallen, and Management Center Europe. He also held regular lectures in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and many other countries.

In 1985, along with two other investors, Puempin acquired a training company with over 1’000 employees, active in almost all European countries. After restructured the company, Puempin and his partners sold the company in 1988.

In the late 1980s Puempin closely worked with Professor Michael Porter of Harvard and supported him in his research on the “International Competitiveness of Nations”. In this assignment, Puempin was responsible for the research of European clusters.

In 1990 Puempin was appointed a consultant of the Swiss Bundesrat, the Executive of the Swiss Confederation. Puempin also supported other countries such as Andorra by developing their country’s strategy.

In the late 1990s Puempin was strongly involved in the building of Metro’s corporate venture company “Invision”. After a Management Buyout he became Vice Chairman and form 2002 till 2010 Chairman of Invision Holding AG, one of Switzerland’s leading private equity companies. Since the 1990s Puempin is a private investor in various companies.

b) Scientific

In his career as a Professor Puempin published thirteen books and over 100 articles. His books were translated into more than 10 languages.

One of his very successful publications was “The Practice of Strategic Management” (1980) that was translated in several languages and printed more than 200’000 times. But the most important work of Puempin was the book “Management strategischer Erfolgspositionen - SEP” (1982), published in English in 1987 under the title “The Essence of Corporate Strategy”. Puempin defined a Strategic Excellence Position (SEP) as a “...central competence of the corporation that enables it to achieve outstanding results.” Thus the concept of “Strategic Excellence Position” strongly corresponds to the well-known term of “Core Competence” published by Hamel and Prahalad in May - June 1990 in Harvard Business Review (HBR) or the concept of “Core Capabilities” published by Stalk et al also in HBR in March - April 1992. Thus Puempin became a forerunner of the concept of core competences that plays a central role in today’s strategic management.

The work of Puempin enjoyed international recognition. In the 1980s Ernst & Young decided to use the concept of “Strategic Excellence Positions” as a basis for their strategy consulting activities. For the development of this concept, Puempin was honored with the Swiss Innovation Prize in 1983.

Another important book that found broad interest was “Corporate Dynamism - How World Class Companies Became World Class”, of which the German version was published in 1990 and was elected the best economic book by Euromarketing. In this work Puempin further developed his strategy concept by promoting the issue of scalability as a means to develop strengths and profitability.

In the 1990s Puempin shifted his interests from corporate strategy to investment strategy. The result of this work was the book “Strategisches Investment Management” published in 2008 (together with Maurice Pedergnana, to be available in English in 2011). Contrary to traditional publications on asset management that apply capital market theory, Puempin’s approach strictly builds on strategy teachings. This leads to completely new findings that are often in strong contradiction to traditional investment management as promoted by financial institutions.

Publications:

● Langfristige Marketingplanung, Konzeption und Formalisierung (doctoral thesis “Dissertation” 1968, 2nd ed. 1970, 136 p.). ● Information und Marketing, Informations-Systeme als Führungsgrundlage (professorial thesis (“Habilitationsschrift”, 1973, 234 p.). ● Strategische Führung in der Unternehmungspraxis (1980, 80 p., French 1981, English 1982). ● Management strategischer Erfolgspositionen (1982, 217 p., Spanish 1982 - with S. Garcia Echevarria, title: Estrategia Empresarial - como implementar la estrategia en la empresa; English 1987: title: The Essence of Corporate Strategy; Portugese 1987, Japanese 1987, Finnish 1989, Korean 1989, Indish Edition Mumbay 1995). ● Unternehmenskultur - Basis strategischer Profilierung erfolgreicher Unternehmen (1985, 56 p. with J.-M. Kobi und H.A. Wuethrich, French 1985; Spanish: Cultura Empresarial, 1988, 139 p. with S. Garcia Echevarria). ● Das Dynamik Prinzip (1989, paperback 1991, English 1989, Spanish 1990 - with S. Garcia Echevarria, French 1991, Italian 1993, Indian edition Mumbay 1995, English new edition: How World Class Companies Became World Class, 1991.) ● Unternehmungs-Dynamik - Wie führen wir Unternehmungen in neue Dimensionen? (64 p. 1991, with C. Imboden, French 1991). ● Management der Unternehmensentwicklung - phasengerechte Führung und der Umgang mit Krisen (1991, 276 p., with J. Prange). ● Strategische Erfolgspositionen - Methodik der dynamischen strategischen Unternehmensführung (1992, 202 p.). ● Strategische Erfolgspositionen - Kernkompetenzen aufbauen und umsetzen (2005, 136 p., with Wolfgang Amann) ● Der Private-Equity-Investor als Strategie-Coach (2005, 167 p., with Bernd Pfister, Martin Ankli, Wolfgang Amann) ● Unternehmensentwicklung - Corporate Life Cycles: Metamorphose statt Kollaps,(2005, 215 p., with Christian Wunderlin ) ● Strategisches Investment Management - Wie Investoren nachhaltige Wertsteigerungen erzielen (2008, 232 p., with Maurice Pedergnana)


Normdaten: PND: 130488577 | LCCN: n82119180 | VIAF: 93983810 | WP-Personeninfo Cathegories: Author | Economist (20th Century) | Economist (21. Jahrhundert) | Academic teacher (St. Gallen) | Swiss | Born 1939 | Man

                        • end*************
Why not be bold and create it yourself? Try the article wizard. I also left some useful links on your talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One thing I notice is that you don't cite any references. On the English Wikipedia (maybe on others, too), a article about a living person must have at least one reference supporting a fact in the article. --Auntof6 (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

publishing a draft[edit]

Hello, I made the following entry originally on May 10, I thought I had submitted it for editing but have not heard back. Today I copied and pasted to submit it differently and I got a warning. How would I get the following article published?

Thanks, Nicole Friedrichs

User:Nicoleseowhat/Ranowear — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicoleseowhat (talkcontribs) 15:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After a quick review, it looks very promotional in tone to me, even if that was not your intention. In any event, please take a look at this page for help with what to do next. – ukexpat (talk) 17:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First off, THANK YOU for working on your article in your namespace, instead of attempting to push it to the mainspace. Getting help from the start is always a good idea. I agree with Ukexpat suggestions. While the promotional tone can be address with additional editing, you also have a distinct conflict of interest and I suggest you read up on that as well. Moving forward, I'm not sure there is enough reliable sources to assert its notability for inclusion into the mainspace. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the text was posted at Ranowear as well, where it has been tagged for deletion. -- John of Reading (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I thought I checked there. Well at least they brought it here before attempting to REintroduce. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of it companies in hyderabad[edit]

Sir,

This website is a gift to human. Life is impossible without it. However you have listed list of it companies in hyderabad,i am a bcom graduate working in ADP ( BPO ) so can you post something that would not only help it proffessionals but also general mass or bcom chunks. In general list of bpos, kpos and ites........ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.57.92.5 (talk) 15:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what bpos, kpos and ites are, but I do know that one of the many things which Wikipedia is not is a business directory. Its purpose is to be an encyclopaedia. If the individual companies are sufficiently notable to have individual articles written about them in Wikipedia, it may be that the information you are asking about would be appropriate in those separate articles. It is not appropriate for a list of companies. I guess you are talking about Software industry in Andhra Pradesh, which is a terrible article as it has hardly any text and few references. --ColinFine (talk) 18:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BLP subject is upset about unflattering photo[edit]

Hi. In covering the Big Apple Con this past weekend for the Commons, I met Dawn Marie and her manager, who were very upset about an unflattering photo taken of Marie at Wondercon while she was pregnant, being used as the main Infobox photo in her article. I removed it for them, and replaced it with one of the other photos on her Commons category page, but they are still upset about that photo being on the Commons. I've never been to WonderCon, but if it operates at all like the New York City-based comic conventions, then fans are probably required to ask permission before photographing one of the guests, which I myself always do. They did not do this, and Ms. Marie (real name: Dawn Marie Psaltis) is highly upset about that photo, and when she learned I was a Wikipedian, she asked for my help. Can it be removed? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to ask at Commons Helpdesk. – ukexpat (talk) 17:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(e/c) The Commons is a sister site with its own administrators, most of whom are not administrators on Wikipedia. I suggest you post at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting an account - need URGENT help[edit]

Hi,

My daughter, who is 10, has opened an account on Wikipedia without my permission and has created and edited various pages and now cannot work out how to delete the account. She has received various messages, from what I think are other users and I cannot work out how the site works or how to help her close the account. From reading several pages I understand it is not possible to close the account, I just wondering if either there are some exceptions to this rule given her age and the general situation, to protect her and remove traces of her being on Wikipedia.

As a parent I am concerned about how much information she may have entered that others may view and also how much she has done on the site. I have tried to undo the editing she has done but I can't undo them and she still seems to be getting messages from other users and Wikipedia regarding her alterations. I am unsure what to do other than email to find out what can be done. I apologise for any trouble she has caused and request either that you delete the account and remove any information she has given and remove the changes or change the username so she cannot be tracked by any other users. I would be grateful for anything you can advice me to do.

As a parent I can understand the situation you find yourself in. You are correct that users cannot simply be deleted as all changes on Wikipedia must be attributed to someone. So long as your daughter's username and edits do not contain any personally identifiable information, I suggest you simply change the password on the account and leave it idle. If her username is part of her real name, or can be tied to another identity of her's on the internet you may request the Right to Vanish. Also for your comfort and information are the following articles: Wikipedia:Child protection Wikipedia:Protecting children's privacy and Wikipedia:Advice for parents. If you have any other questions or need clarification, just ask! Tiggerjay (talk) 18:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relax, no harm has been done to the encyclopaedia. Your daughter was just discovering out how to contribute to an encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. She even succeeded in creating an article for the singer (Caggie Dunlop) that no one else has got round to doing yet. The messages she received was just offering help and advice. She seems to have complied fully with the advice here -Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Ironically, only yourself has given any personal info in the form of this editor's age.--Aspro (talk) 19:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As per the mother's request, I have made the account vanish. Kingturtle = (talk) 12:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Cartwright[edit]

Hi. My agency represents Nancy Cartwright. I have tried several times to get in touch with those at Wikipedia to take down certain text from her page (via request from Nancy), as well as change her name. I have sent validation that we represent her, as well as a copy of Nancy's license to validate her name change.

This is the text she wants removed: "In 2007, Cartwright was in a relationship with contractor Stephen Brackett.[74] They planned to get married in Spring 2008.[16][75] Brackett was the President and Treasurer of Brackett Construction in Hollywood, California; the construction company was founded in 1987 and had $8.5 million in sales in 2009.[76] He was a fellow member of Scientology,[75] reaching the Operating Thetan level of OT V in Scientology, in 1989.[77] He died in May 2009.[78] According to The Monterey County Herald, Brackett leaped off of the Bixby Creek Bridge in Big Sur, California.[78] Law enforcement stated, "friends and relatives of Brackett said he was despondent because of financial troubles with his business."[78]

In January 2009, Cartwright used Bart's voice in an automated telephone message to Scientologists, inviting them to an event in Hollywood, California.[70][79] She opened the message in Bart's voice, saying "Yo, what's happenin' man, this is Bart Simpson [laugh]", then used her normal voice in most of the remaining message.[80][81] In a 2000 interview, Cartwright explained that a character's voice is copyrighted and she can use Bart's voice in public but cannot record original dialogue without approval.[82] Al Jean, executive producer of The Simpsons, said that "[the telephone calls were not] authorized by us",[79] while The Simpsons creator Matt Groening commented that the issue had been "blown up beyond what was intended".[83][84]

In September 2011, it was announce Cartwright was being sued by the executives of American Safety Casualty Insurance Company over a policy covering refurbishment work Stephen Bracket failed to finish before his death. The lawsuit sought $260,000 from Cartwright, who the company claims was guarantor for the policy but has refused to cover the expenses. The lawsuit also alleges Brackett diverted contract funds to the Church of Scientology.[85]"

I can also send her license to another person if need be in order to get the name change.

Thanks,

Jocelyn Bresnick JAG Entertainment <redacted> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagentpr (talkcontribs) 18:16, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored. Subjects of articles do not have any power of approval over articles, although we have quite elaborate policies to maximize the accuracy of biographies of living persons. If the information is not true, then begin by stating this on the talk page of the article in question, along with reliable sources to verify your statement. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:23, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You also have options of using WP:OTRS to submit other types of verification, which might not otherwise be easily referenced. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning some Photos on Wikipedia[edit]

Hello , Some photos are put on Wikipedia for scientific purposes , but these photos contain substances that should be 18+ , for example Vasectomy , which is a word I didn't know , or wanted to know more about in more details , and saw it in another article , I clicked it , then while reading , I see a picture of a male's sexual organ on the right , ofcourse if a child is reading this ... this will impact him negatively.

I do not demand removal of such pictures , but I am suggesting installing a system that hides a picture , Like " THIS PICTURE HAS BEEN VERIFIED AS 18+ , CLICK HERE TO VIEW IT. " , so People could read without being disturbed by photos such about issues such as Sex or medical operations like Vasectomy ; because Wikipedia is a source of education to many people and a great reference.

I hope that I have clarified , Thank you very much... PLEASE DO IT , I want to see my children learning from Wikipedia , but not with these photos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.211.192.208 (talk) 20:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:NOTCENSORED and Help:Options to not see an image CTJF83 20:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

en:WP pictures[edit]

Hi. I know here you can upload images (some free, mostly with Fair Use). I´m looking for free images of muscle cell because in Commons there are few and no good. Can someone tell me how to find them? Do you have any page or something where I can take a look? Thanks. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 21:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you by chance notice http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Cell_biology ? Not sure exactly what kind of images you are looking for. CTJF83 21:21, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I search, but is not what I´m looking for. I explain: I'm trying to improve syncytium (es:Sincitio) to make it "good". I'm trying to find a picture or photo where could be visible the cell of the muscle with all their nuclei. I found this, but is not very good. In fact, it´s almost impossible to see any nucleus. Thank you. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 21:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, not sure I can provide any more help other than a fair use of one of these. Hopefully someone else can be of more assistance. CTJF83 21:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Skeletal muscle - cross section, nerve bundle.jpg or File:PHIL 2767 Poliovirus Myotonic dystrophic changes.jpg? CTJF83 21:54, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You know? Poliovirus's is gret: a syncytium in a syncytium. I love it. And the Google Search is also good. Thanks for the effor. --Andreateletrabajo (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How Do I Reach and Experienced Wikipedia to Make Sure I'm Not Spamming the Place Up? :)[edit]

There is a phenomena that I believe deserves a page for reference as well as awareness. It's an idea I've seen around and at one time I actually formed a web site and tried to make a software for schools, www.laptop.org and corporate environments. We have since closed our doors and open sourced our code. The article I am proposing is for a Wikitube a generic term for Video Wiki or video wiki mashup. There are a lot of people who have proposed this. Some of them are pretty aggressive promoters and are on your spambot list. I'm aware of them but believe they have good intentions.

Wikitube dot com (Atlanta) Wikitube dot org (Japan) Wikitube dot tv (Washington DC) Nibipedia.org (that's me) Sophia.org which I just came across claims to be a Youtube + Wikipedia + Facebook mashup. Arguably Wikipedia itself as it adds more video could be considered on the fringe but can't really qualify as a mash up because it's the main primary service.

I would be happy to write the article but given the past behaviors of some individuals in the wikitube space (here and elsewhere) I want to be respectful of the community and not just start writing articles that will a) be perceived and marketing attempts b) be viewed as another attempt to market one versus the other. That said, I do think that this is a valid topic for Wikipedia as I've had many many people say they've wondered about it even they have differing ideas about what it might be like or how it could work.

I submit respectfully this request for assistance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Troyapeteson (talkcontribs) 21:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let me first direct you to WP:YFA which is a great place to get started in understanding the basics of adding a page on Wikipedia and the standards which are required. Among them, is just because the term may be out there may not make it notable enough to be included here. And since you have a stated conflict of interest it may be best to submit an article for creation request instead of making it yourself. Tiggerjay (talk) 22:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect/outdated IP address | errors in talk page | "wikipedia is yelling at me and I don't know what I did"[edit]

To whom this may concern:

I have never edited a wikipedia page in my entire life, and I have not participated in any other way with the wikipedia community (until now). Additionally, I have never had a wikipedia login. Finally, I just recently signed up for service at my new location and thus have a brand new (I think) IP address with my ISP (I'm being vague per the instructions above). On my latest attempt to use wikipedia, however, my talk page indicated that (apparently) "I" had vandalized numerous pages, promoted spam links, and accomplished other disreputable acts. Since I am 100% certain I did not do any of the actions attributed to me (dated 2008 and earlier), I am concerned that my ability to participate in wikipedia will be hampered by the malfeasance of a previous owner of my IP address.

I am thus curious: How did this happen? How can I avoid it in the future? What should I do right now to maintain full cooperation with wikipedia?

Thank you!

Sincerely,

A Very Puzzled User —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.66.100.61 (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The warnings on the talk page are from 2008. You can ignore them. The person who used this IP address back in 2008 was responsible for those edits. GB fan (talk) 22:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, just ignore it. The edits and warnings are 3 years old and administrators know that IP addresses are often reassigned. If you are curious, you can see the old spam edits by clicking the "diff" links at Special:Contributions/71.66.100.61. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to avoid the issue completely then create an account and log in, but it isn't required. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(e/c)::Those actions will not hamper you from editing. I will go and delete those messages to avoid confusion. However, I would highly recommend that you register for your own account here. This is option but would avoid this problem in the future, plus there are additional benefits of logging in explained here: WP:WHY Tiggerjay (talk) 22:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How to merge the content of an article into a category?[edit]

Resolved
 – I am going to AfD the article. --Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a template to propose on an article that the content of an article be merged into an existing category? Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 23:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by merging an article into a category? Name the article and category. A category is used to organize articles and doesn't normally has its own text beyond a short description of what type of article the category is for. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article I have in mind is List of polygons, polyhedra and polytopes. It seems to me this article is just an arbitrary collection of articles related to Polytopes. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 00:28, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Which category do you want to "merge" to? Or do you only want to delete the list and keep the articles in whatever categories they already belong to? PrimeHunter (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think the most reasonable target would be Category:Polytopes. The article in its current form is in my opinion not useful as an article, as it simply groups polytope articles rather arbitrarily. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 00:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think Category:Polytopes would become messy if all these articles were dumped there. Many of them are already in subcategories. There isn't really a process for "merging" a list to a category. You can nominate the list at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and separately suggest a new categorization system for polytopes. The two are not mutually exclusive. You should also contact the list creator who is still editing 7 years later. PrimeHunter (talk) 01:00, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am going to AfD the article. I don't see how it could ever be developed into a useful list. I have already had a short conversation with another user at Talk:List of polygons, polyhedra and polytopes where he agreed that this article is useless in its current form. I think I will also contact the original creator of the article. Thanks, PrimeHunter. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I added some films to the template called Template:Autism_films. But it is unbalanced right now for some reason. Could someone fix the template? Thanks! Neptunekh2 (talk) 23:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the worst formatting error. I am working on others but get edit conflicts with you with non-trivial merges after you add content. Please stop editing the template until I have saved the next time. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:19, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I have saved. The same article should not be linked twice in a navigation box so I removed some duplicates. Feel free to move them to another group but don't duplicate them. I have also piped some links. If it still looks unbalanced to you then please describe the problem more precisely. It can depend on font size, screen resolution, window width, browser and so on. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia "Contest"[edit]

Hi, Not sure if you know, when you type the address for Wikipedia, sometimes a message automatically pops up saying you've won a Wikipedia contest, please click on this link and give your email address and shipping address to win one of three $1,000 prizes, one of which is a gift card to Walmart. This seems suspicious, so I'm not sure if you were aware this was happening or not. 71.209.33.156 (talk) 23:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to run anti-virus/anti-spyware software. That is not from Wikipedia. GB fan (talk) 23:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds more like you are sometimes mistyping the Wikipedia address and experiencing typosquatting by landing on a domain unassociated with Wikipedia but pretending to be Wikipedia. Do not give them any information. You can use a browser bookmark to avoid having to type the right address each time you visit Wikipedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:05, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]