Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2012 January 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 27 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 29 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 28[edit]

Filtering recent changes[edit]

Is there any way to filter recent changes so that only the changes related to me will be visible? --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 03:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean Special:RecentChangesLinked? Nyttend (talk) 04:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank for the link. But when I registered, I clicked some link that showed recent changes related to the topics in my userboxes. But I can't find the link now. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 04:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds like Special:RecentChangesLinked with Page name = User:SupernovaExplosion. Under "Toolbox" in the left pane at User:SupernovaExplosion is the link "Related changes" which goes directly to Special:RecentChangesLinked/User:SupernovaExplosion. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of where you are on Wikipedia, you'll be able to see that page. It's always in the toolbox on the left side (the text is "Related changes"), just below "What links here". Please note that it gives you links related to the page you're viewing, so you'll need to be at your userpage or your user talk page for it to give you changes related to you. It works by giving you a list of changes to pages linked by the page in question; for example, if you click it from your userpage, it will show when the Firefox article is changed, because your userpage links to that article via a userbox. There's no way to get it to avoid links present only in the userboxes. Nyttend (talk) 13:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It is the link. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alternatively, you might be thinking of your watchlist.  Chzz  ►  15:33, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 NFL Draft[edit]

This page is locked from being edited due to vandalism. How do I inform you of subject matter that requires editing?

GizzyDJ (talk) 05:53, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You do so at Talk:2012 NFL Draft. Start a new thread and let people know what you wish to change. Someone will be along shortly to evaluate your proposal and make the change if appropriate. --Jayron32 06:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Use the template {{edit semi-protected}} on the talk page. Please read Wikipedia:Edit requests for instructions. Dru of Id (talk) 06:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Or click the "View source" tab and follow the instructions. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hands produce heat sweat all time[edit]

Is their a scientific fact of this "heat" caused by over usage of certain brain activity that cause some to sweat that way I was a drafter in school and that's when I noticed I have a pretty above average IQ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.228.221.234 (talk) 08:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried Wikipedia's Reference Desk? They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer just about any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what this Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. I hope this helps.--Hallows AG 09:16, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facts About Lassie...[edit]

Watching the 1951 movie "People Will Talk" with stars Cary Grant and Jeanne Crain, noticed about half way through the movie a menacingly barking collie dog looking like the early "Lassie" which was referred to in the movie as "Beelzebub"...when the character played by Cary Grant quipped..."You'd think they would call a dog like that, 'Pal' or something." Checking the article here and discovered that "Lassie" was actually a dog named "Pal." That had been a subtle joke in the film for "Lassie" fans. Thus the film "People Will Talk" and the role played as "Beelzebub" in 1951 should be on the Chart you have in the article on "Lassie/Pal." This is a sixty year old item, but just as fresh for folks to know about today. Particularly because the movie "People Will Talk" was far ahead of its time and dealt with very sensitive subjects, just as tough today as they were 60 years ago. Could someone properly insert that item for me? Thank you.09:06, 28 January 2012 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by America1977 (talkcontribs)

If you have a reliable source that gives that information, you are free to add it to the article. If not, you shouldn't. --ColinFine (talk) 13:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing IP address[edit]

I just made a minor edit to an article without thinking to log in first (It was 4AM local time). I subsequently corrected that however by logging in so the edit could be properly attributed to my user name. Is there any way to remove my IP address from the publicly viewable edit history for that article? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lemfoss (talkcontribs) 09:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:42, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - see Wikipedia:Requests for oversight, which includes requests for hiding "accidentally disclosed IP addresses". -- John of Reading (talk) 09:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The name of the editor cannot be changed; however, it can be removed from view in the history, as John explained above. But if you want the edit to appear under your name, you'd have to "undo" the edit by the IP, and re-do it.  Chzz  ►  15:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Camp All Saints[edit]

Dear Sir or Madam, I have created a page for "All Saints Camp and Conference Center." However, the camp has now changed name to "Camp All Saints". I was unable to update the name by moving the page, as I do not seem to have that right. Please update the page accordingly and notify me when the change is complete. I thank you for your time!

Best wishes, Gareth Kalfas Assistant Director Camp All Saints

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sapte24 (talkcontribs) 14:24, 28 January 2012‎

I have moved the page to Camp All Saints for you.
Please take a moment to read about conflict of interest, and see the business FAQ. Thanks,  Chzz  ►  15:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone see an assertion of importance or significance in this article? Two of the links are dead and the third is a self-ref. I have tagged it for speedy deletion. – ukexpat (talk) 15:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

payment not payed[edit]

dear sir ,

i am vendor for your company chennai valasaravakkam branch,i give mobile diesel generator for one day rent at november 2011.but my payment not settle .kindly take for any action to settle my payment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.106.25 (talk) 14:24, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 3.8 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for asking questions related to using or contributing to Wikipedia itself. Thus, we have no special knowledge about the subject of your question. You can, however, search our vast catalogue of articles by typing a subject into the search field on the upper right side of your screen. If you cannot find what you are looking for, we have a reference desk, divided into various subject areas, where asking knowledge questions is welcome. Best of luck.  Chzz  ►  15:26, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

changing from subpage to article space?[edit]

hello. i have recently created a page about a footballer, and when i have tried to find it on wikipedia and google etc.. i cannot find it. when i log in i can see the page under my contribs, and by reading a few of the other questions in this forum, i have read that it is most likely in my subpage, and not article space.. is this correct? if so, how do i change it? thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominici82 (talkcontribs) 14:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article you are asking about is Christopher O'Hare? That is a live page as of now.
Because it was so recently created, it may not appear in the Wikipedia search 'predictive text' for some hours (maybe a day), and it may take some time before Google and other search engines index it; give it a few days.
Thanks for adding to our project.  Chzz  ►  15:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier Ripley filmography section[edit]

Can you tell me why the filmography is not in the good section but in the external link section...

Thank you so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tx187 (talkcontribs) 14:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The table code was not closed properly, I have corrected it. MilborneOne (talk) 15:23, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Re. Olivier Ripley; see this edit  Chzz  ►  15:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Request for Les Lalanne Article Feedback[edit]

I recently submitted an article on artist duo Les Lalanne and am interested in receiving feedback on the article to ensure that it's in the best shape for publication. Thank you in advance for your help. Pkgediting (talk) 15:57, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed and removed the tag. I have also tagged the article for merger with François-Xavier Lalanne. Both are short articles and very closely related so I think they should be merged and then Les Lalanne redirected to François-Xavier Lalanne. – ukexpat (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help with image copyright[edit]

I require help with the copyright of an image for a Wikipedia page. I uploaded an image of the building and put it on the following page- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellwerk_Fichtengrund Wikipedia posted a notice questioning the copyright and I can't understand the process to establish the copyright. The image has now been removed. I took the photo with my own camera and edited it on my own computer, have never sold the image or given it or licensed it to anyone but am happy to give it a "Public domain - {{PD-self}}" status. I provided all the information I thought could be relevant with the image including - a statement saying I took the image - the date it was taken - the name of the building in the photograph - a comment saying I am happy for the image to be used by anyone but it has still been removed by Wikipedia. I don't know what to do? Please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stellwerk (talkcontribs) 15:59, 28 January 2012

Looking at the deleted page, I see you then shortly thereafter blanked the image-description page, removing that tag. The result by the time anyone (or any bot) bot around to looking was that the image you uploaded really did have no tag, so the deletion process became fairly mechanical. You were given a week's warning about the problem and impending deletion. I have undeleted the image. Please edit it to add the appropriate tags ASAP. DMacks (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for trying to help. Where do I find the 'image-description page' and it's 'tag' so I can put information into it? When I view the page with the full size image on it I can see what I understand to be the relevant information under 'File History > Comment' and also under 'Metadata' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stellwerk (talkcontribs) 17:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The image description page is File:Stw Fichtengrund 2011.jpg. The {{PD-self}} goes in the Licensing section. The 'File History > Comment' is your upload comment, but you deleted that from the page when you blanked the page. —teb728 t c 17:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected what I think needs to be done. Could you kindly take another look at the page to check it is now sufficient and let me know if it needs something more? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stellwerk (talkcontribs) 18:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I inserted your text into the {{information}} block. It looks good now. —teb728 t c 21:40, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cannot find a submit button after creating an article.[edit]

Hello,

I have started an article about a year ago. When I log in, there's no link to my article, so I end up having to search for it or going to Subpages before I can work on it. Is that normal? I last worked on it again last December and was ready to submit my article.

However I cannot figure out how to submit that article. There's no submit button and I cannot find any screenshot or video tutorial that shows you where to go exactly to submit that article.

This is frustrating because I'm probably missing something very obvious. Can you, please, help me with that very basic question? Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bianling (talkcontribs) 17:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The page you need to read is WP:SYMUD. - David Biddulph (talk) 17:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Once you're happy with your article, place {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} at the top of your article. Then an experienced user will review your article. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 17:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Zippy, I should have asked that newbie question a long time ago or read help pages more thoroughly! I'm assuming reviews are backed up. Does that mean I could not get an answer back for months? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bianling (talkcontribs) 17:37, 28 January 2012‎

When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured to the right.
When an article is submitted for review, it usually gets a response within days. Currently, there's a large backlog (CAT:AFC), so it could take around a week, maybe even longer.
But, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mikhail Santaro is indeed now in the queue.  Chzz  ►  08:51, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly silly lack of confidence in removing tag[edit]

I've just added references to the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Rabbit_Bundrick

It's tagged as a BLP without references. Given it now has some, but not an exhaustive set of, references perhaps the tag could be removed. But, I'd be happier if someone else agreed with me that there are enough references to justify removing the tag.

Also, there are some references (and a comment referring to adding a references section) on the talk page for that article. What gives? Did someone add the references and they disappeared later? Ross-c (talk) 18:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tag says that the article has no references at all; it does, so you have every right to remove it. If you were unsure, you could place a {{Refimprove}} tag on the page in its place; however, I don't believe that would be necessary. In future, go ahead and be bold - the worst that can happen is someone will disagree and revert it. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 18:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) As for the talk page, it looks like the references were removed because they were not cited inline and the remover felt they were cluttering the article. You can re-add them if you feel they would improve the article, but try not to edit war with the remover. Finally, we don't use BBCode here; the toolbar can do most basic effects, or you can learn wikitext. --NYKevin @806, i.e. 18:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've added the {{Refimprove}} tag. Now let's see if I can find another article without references.... Ross-c (talk) 18:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can find over 200,000 of them listed in Category:Articles lacking sources. -- John of Reading (talk) 21:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to review the information on creating references. There are templates you can follow. Tattoo515 (talk) 00:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]