Jump to content

Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 June 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< June 4 << May | June | Jul >> June 6 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 5

[edit]

please remove Publishing from Maynard Clarck about Chief Wompimeequin Wampatuck

[edit]

please remove article written about Wompimeequin wampatuck published by Maynard Clarck it was put up without permission thank you kindly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.61.15.196 (talk) 00:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you'll need to provide a link to the article in question. I can't find it based on the information you've provided. Incidentally, whose permission do you suppose is required to create an article? RivertorchFIREWATER 03:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The OP may be referring to this talk page posting. Maproom (talk) 08:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that sound likely. The best place to discuss the problem is on that talk page. If the only evidence is from Facebook, then the paragraph has no place in Wikipedia. It is not currently in any article. Dbfirs 08:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Entry

[edit]

I have completed a trademark on a bumper sticker and would like to add its meaning to Wikipedia. I have signed up and now have a login/password. What is my next step?Nicebeaver (talk) 02:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nicebeaver. Welcome to Wikipedia. But Wikipedia is not the place to publish the meaning of your trademarked terms. I would suggest a quick read to one of our critical policies: Why original research should not be included on Wikipedia, and some of our very important guidelines on what Wikipedia is not, why you might have a conflict of interest and what kind of articles can be included on Wikipedia. Write back for more help. Thanks. Lourdes 02:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Free image source template

[edit]
Resolved

See User talk:MB.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:US image sources lists U.S. sources of free images. It includes Flickr, and says the required license is CC 2.0. But at WM Commons, I believe CC 2.5 or higher is required. Am I interpreting this correctly? Is this template out-of-date? MB 04:42, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

sentinel steam locomotive, 9596.

[edit]

The location of Sentinel steam loco 9596, George, Is..under restoration by Mervyn Mayes and Vic Ward at the old railway yard, Yaxham, Norfolk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.52.240 (talk) 09:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information; but there may be nobody here who has any use for it. I'm guessing you are suggesting that it be added to an article. If you have a published source for the information, you are welcome to add it to the article (with a citation to that source) - Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia that anybody may edit. If you don't feel confident in editing the article, or do not have a source, the best place to suggest it is on the article's talk page (every article has a Talk page, though in some cases the Talk page has not yet been created). If no published source can be found, then the information should not go into the article, as all information in Wikipedia is supposed to be referenced to published source.
@86.177.52.240: - Already mentioned in the Rolling stock of the Mid-Norfolk Railway article. Mjroots (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qatar edit

[edit]

On the main page of the qatar entry there is a bias line:

In June 2017, The Wahhabi terrorist states, Saudi Arabia (a brutal dictatorship that sponsors terrorism and has proven links to 9/11 and other atrocities) , Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt cut off diplomatic relations with Qatar for allegedly supporting terrorism, causing the 2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis. In 2017, Qatar was the best. By Jamal Badr. Also, they aren't terrorists.

Those facts are unfounded. When you go in to edit the "brutal dictatorship crap" out it isnt there to edit out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.126.201.198 (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The vandalism by 176.74.218.197 was soon reverted by other editors. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translation template?

[edit]

I've just made an edit which includes a quote that I'm fairly certain has been translated by somebody with a less-than perfect grasp of English (but undoubtedly better than my knowledge of Finnish).

Anyway as it's a quote I don't want to change it, but is there a template one can use to show that a quote may not have originally been in English? At the moment it's unsourced so removal is always an option, but I'd rather keep it as I've already trimmed quite a bit from the section in question. Chaheel Riens (talk) 14:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chaheel Riens, hello. You could give a quick look to Template:Lang. Thanks. Lourdes 00:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Please add Katie Frates; thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.101.208 (talk) 16:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anonymous user. Not quite sure what you're asking, but I'm guessing that you want somebody to write an article about Katie Frates. It's fine to ask for that (though you could make your request a bit clearer), but Wikipedia articles take a lot of work to create, and all our editors are volunteers, who write about what they find interesting or important. If you think she is sufficiently notable (in Wikipedia's special sense - i.e. that there are several pieces of substantial material published about her by people who have no connection with her) then there could be an article about her. You could try creating it yourself (start by reading your first article - but it isn't easy), or you could request it by adding it to an appropriate list at Requested articles. If you find some suitable independent sources, and cite them in your request, that will make the request more attractive for somebody to pick up and work on. --ColinFine (talk) 22:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article not indexing on Google Search

[edit]

Hello all. This following article has been published on wikipedia, but it impossible to find it through search engines unless you have the specific link. I have looking into the source code and found this <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"/> How can we remedy to the problem?

Url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salomon_Thiombiano

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sthiomb (talkcontribs) 16:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Controlling search engine indexing. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sthiomb: Also, the article was just created today. It takes a little bit of time for Google to index articles, so they will never appear immediately. Did you have someone create the article about you (I'm guessing it's about you since your username appears to match the subject of that article). ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:07, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Nihonjoe: Please provide specific information as to which sources are not reliable? Lefrancais9 (talk) 18:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lefrancais9:Wow, three different brand new editors now working on (or concerned about) the article of a non-notable fashion blogger (he's dapper, though, according to some of the sources). Smells to me like dirty socks. I've posted over on the article talk page. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 03:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Colley

[edit]

Hi there. I am trying to make a page about the actress Samantha Colley. I thought I had made it. But when I search for Samantha Colley on a search engine, the wikipedia page does not come up. Can someone help me with this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samantha_Colley Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PatrickPatrickPatrick (talkcontribs) 16:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New articles are WP:NOINDEXed until they are either patrolled through the new page patrol process (which has a backlog of 5 moths) or until they have been waiting for 90 days. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is my Userpage Nominated for Deletion?

[edit]

My apologies if this is the incorrect forum (I don't spent much time in the community part of Wikipedia), but my userpage was nominated for deletion by User:Marvellous Spider-Man. As I wrote in the AfD page (here): "My user page contains contact information (explicitly allowed under Wikipedia:User pages) and "Work in progress or material that you may come back to in future"." Am I breaking some rule unknown to me? What is the rationale? PvOberstein (talk) 17:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think that keeping a draft on "Sabzar Ahmad Bhat" among your user pages would be fine. But putting it on your user page User:PvOberstein, which is meant to be a page about you as relevant to your activities on WIkipedia, is not. I suggest you move the draft, maybe to User:PvOberstein/Sabzar Ahmad Bhat. Maproom (talk) 17:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've now done so. I hope that's the end of the problem. Maproom (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The draft has been moved, as per your recommendation, Maproom. That said, I still have to ask: is it proper procedure to simply nominate a userpage for deletion without making any outreach to the user? Furthermore, does the posting of contact information constitute a "promotional userpage"? (I realize this might sound passive aggressive, that is not my intent, I would simply like an answer). PvOberstein (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Having contact information is not promotional. The way your userpage looks now is fine. ~ GB fan 18:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surely it depends on the context? Why would you want contact information on a userpage - when the very reason for a userpage is to provide a contact point for a user. Contact info for something other than on-Wiki use shouldn't be necessary. It may be that some users have alternate accounts in operation, so want to list them, but otherwise it's hard to image a need for any other form of valid contact info. Probably better to say that having contact information may not be promotional, but each case differs.

However, as to your other comment - I would expect out of courtesy (apart from obviously disruptive or vandalistic cases) that a user should be approached prior to the deletion request being submitted. But there's nothing to say that a user must be approached prior. Chaheel Riens (talk) 21:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Considering Help:Searching#Other search tools, I would like to kindly point out that the page "page contribution" linked there does not work [yet]. By the way, what would actually be the difference to the revision history?--Erdic (talk) 23:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Is there any way I can search for text in a user's contributions page? (WikiBlame is not available here)--Erdic (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have updated the link to User Contribution Search.[1] PrimeHunter (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a weird one...

[edit]

I went to the page at c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Official portraits of Donald Trump when I noticed that Firefox had the little "mute tab" icon on the tab. There was no audio when I unmuted it. I have seen this before on commons and meta, but figured hat I must have hit the mute by accident. This time it was a freshly opened tab. Not a problem really, but I am curious; any ideas as to why this happened? --Guy Macon (talk) 23:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could be an add-on you might have in Firefox that preemptively mutes tabs. Or the keys <ctrl>+m may have been pressed accidentally while opening the tab. Lourdes 01:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. The latter is a real possibility. I am using a Ducky keyboard (I highly recommend them) and the Ctrl key is very close to the lower left corner and somewhat easy to hit with my wrist. Thanks! --Guy Macon (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]