Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2017 November 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 11 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 13 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 12[edit]

I have failed when trying to add a file from Commons into the info. box. The file is now at the very top of this page. Sorry. It is of a crest - I also have added a reference which describes crest. Please place INSIDE the box if you are able - at the very top I think it should go. Thanks 101.189.107.58 (talk) 01:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I put it outside the infobox, as it is in Thomas Hungerford (Speaker). I think the portrait that's already there at the top is better. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is NOT a crest, it is a coat of arms. I delight in heraldry used in articles where it was clearly relevant to the subject's era; but please get the terminology right. I suggest you start with achievement (heraldry) and study the components of a full achievement of arms. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I want to have a name someone already chosen in Wikipedia[edit]

Help — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveAkilan (talkcontribs) 02:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dave, WP:USURP has details relevant to your request. Thanks, Lourdes 03:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

writing an article on Wikipedia[edit]

Kindly give me information about how to write an article here. What is the basic procedure I must follow . Which type of reference I must give . Can topic be of mechanical only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shivam Joshi MEC (talkcontribs) 03:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Your first article is a good place to start. The answer to your "which type" question depends on the subject about which you are interested in writing; if you could quickly explain (just a sentence or two), I could give you a better answer. And I don't understand what you mean about "can topic be of mechanical only"; could you please elaborate? Nyttend (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can i include references or bibliography references to any articles on Wikipedia ?[edit]

Dear Wikipedia Administrators

Is it possible to include Bibliography references from text books or any books on any wikipedia articles ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Showerman05 (talkcontribs) 07:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Showerman. Your question is not clear; but if you are asking whether you can cite books as references in Wikipedia articles, the answer is certainly yes, provided they are reliably published (published by reputable publishers). Self-published books may be cited in limited cases (see WP:SELFPUB, but book a from publisher with no reputation is probably not going to be regarded as a reliable source, and so should not normally be cited. Please see referencing for beginners for more on this, and how to cite.
If you mean, can you take items from the bibliography of a a book, and cite those directly in a Wikipedia article, the answer is that you should not cite any source unless you have seen it yourself.
Have I answered your question? --ColinFine (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-shape and stub-templates[edit]

Why is PD-shape mentioned on "See also" section of documentation for many stub-templates? For example, on Template:Ornithology-stub#See also or Template:Russia-geo-stub#See also. Alex Spade (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was added to {{Stub documentation}} by Hyacinth with no explanation.[1] I don't see a reason for it. {{Stub documentation}} has 28436 transclusions which produce section edit links to it. Maybe Hyacinth clicked edit on a page where the link is helpful without realising 28000 other pages would get it. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Sanchez[edit]

Diego is still alive! You have him as died in the ring against Matt Brown? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.63.205.184 (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was vandalism, removed three minutes before your post was saved. If you still see it then bypass your cache. PrimeHunter (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)If this refers to the Wikipedia page Diego Sanchez, he is shown there as still alive. Unfortunately there was some earlier vandalism to the Wiki page which has since been corrected.
If you are referring to the results of a Google search as here Wikipedia has no control over what is displayed there although the way it is shown often implies that it comes from Wikipedia. There is a 'feedback' link at the bottom of the Google search panel where that information is displayed. Eagleash (talk) 17:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Google has seemingly caught up now. Eagleash (talk) 17:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If an user is no longer an administrative user -- bureaucrat, steward, administrator et cetera -- on project not English Wikipedia, shall description on user pages be edited accordingly.[edit]

Per title, what shall an user do? -- Ktsquare (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A user may do nothing or may do something. What is your question? Ruslik_Zero 18:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The section title is the question? -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ktsquare. I'm afraid if you are talking about another Wikipedia, then probably no one here can help you. Each language Wikipedia is an independent project, with its own rules and pollcies.
I think that what you are askingis, if a user has mentioned their status as an admin etc on their user page, and they cease to have those permissions, they must remove the claim from their user page? And if they don't may somebody else do so? That's an interesting question. I can't find any policy on the question in English Wikipedia (but as I say, other Wikipedias may have different policies anyway). --ColinFine (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here at en:wp, we remove such claims, because it produces confusion among those who are looking for someone with those user rights. I don't know what other projects do. Nyttend (talk) 03:42, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new page[edit]

I am working in a pgae for the band LAW, The band has a great bio on there website, but almost no other published info. Is there a way i can still reference this? even though it is the subjects on page- update: read farther into the policies and got it cleared up — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahisreal (talkcontribs) 18:58, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Is this problem solved now? If not, you can reference their official website if they have enough info about the band. However, you have to be sure the source you're citing meets Wikipedia's policies. Check Wikipedia:Citing sources for more info.

Happy Editing!

O. neon 20:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC)OfficialNeonO. neon 20:28, 12 November 2017 (UTC) User:OfficialNeon

Hello, Jahisreal. If there is "almost no other published info" about a band other than their own website, then the band is not notable and is ineligible for a Wikipedia article at this time. Please read our notabilty guideline for musical performers. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 22:26, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

how to create a contribution[edit]

how to create a contribution — Preceding unsigned comment added by One more creation (talkcontribs) 19:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! To be able to contribute to an edit, click on the 'edit source' button located at most articles. However, some pages may be protected to prevent vandalism or for other reasons. Check Wikipedia:Protection Policy for more info.

However, if you would like to make your first article, head over to Wikipedia:Your first article. Happy editing! O. neon 20:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)OfficialNeonO. neon 20:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Glen Jacobs[edit]

I am making an edit for Glen Jacobs by adding his political party. I think that is necessary considering he is currently running for political office. My edit however, is not showing up on his page. Why is this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lmike1330 (talkcontribs) 20:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Referring to edits of Kane (wrestler).) Because the template "Infobox professional wrestler" does not support a field "political party". The infobox templates (like all templates) only support fields they are coded to handle. I suggest you put this in the body of the article instead of infobox. RJFJR (talk) 20:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't upload photo[edit]

Please find me a solution to add picture in the page which i'm creating now — Preceding unsigned comment added by G Kalpana (talkcontribs) 21:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@G Kalpana: This is your only edit from this account so we don't have any idea what you are talking about unless you tell us. As for the image, where did you find this image? If you just found it on the Internet somewhere please do not upload it here. It is most likely copyrighted and uploading it here will result in it being deleted. If you want more information I'm going to need to know exactly what article and what image you are talking about. --Majora (talk) 21:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

El Tùnel[edit]

Good morning,

I have a very serious issue with the resume of the book El Tùnel from Ernesto Sabàto. Yes, in fact, this is a book that was very much recommended to me and I was looking forward and happy to read it. I get to the Wikipedia page, start reading this resume. And there it is. The spoiler that ruined my appreciation for this novel. You cannot just put the ending of a book in a resume. You stick to the general history, just as in the back of a book. Unfortunately, it is impossible to rewind and forget this ending, which is, by the way, very tragic. But I think it is only fair that I spoil you a very important even in literary history : Dumbledore dies. Have a good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Christinaaguilera1234 (talkcontribs) 23:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Christinaaguilera1234, sorry for your experience. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and our content guidelines follow the philosophy that it is not acceptable to delete information from an article because one believes it spoils the plot. There is also consensus amongst Wikipedia editors to not include spoiler alerts in articles. Wikipedia's content guidelines on spoilers and on disclaimers in articles has information relevant to your query. May I also request you to go through WP:IMPERSONATE? The strong suggestion is to not edit under a name that is likely to imply that you are (or are related to) a specific, identifiable person, unless it is your real name. If you have the same name as a well-known person to whom you are unrelated, and are using your real name, you should state clearly on your userpage that you are unrelated to the well-known person. Please feel free to ask for further clarification. Thanks, Lourdes 03:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If one wishes to read a book without knowing in advance how the plot develops, its a good idea to not read an encyclopedia article about that book, particularly a section of that article entitled "Plot summary."
As a (former) bookseller, I've actually come across several books whose vital plot twists are given away in the back cover blurbs. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.200.138.27 (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the proper format for that spoiler was "Snape kills Dumbledore"? [FBDB]FlyingAce✈hello 01:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]