Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2021 February 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 19 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 21 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 20[edit]

Rush Limbaugh Biography Page[edit]

Re: Section on "funeral & tributes"

"Internment" needs to be changed to "interment". These two words have different meanings and interment is the correct word.

Funeral and tributes Governor Ron DeSantis said flags in the state of Florida, Limbaugh's home state, will be lowered to half-staff on the date of his internment.[284] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:560:4D7:B025:2D17:24A1:E60E (talk) 00:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer your proposed edits at Talk:Rush Limbaugh. 331dot (talk) 00:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The spelling error has been fixed. RudolfRed (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Broken chart[edit]

The first chart on Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United States medical cases/Michigan broke when the data for February 13 was added. I can't find a fix or even duplicate it with other data sets. Anyone know of a solution. With the unusual numbers generated for the x axis I am guessing it has something to do with the way the chart generates the dates. Rmhermen (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed by changing year 3021 to 2021.[1]. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The wrong year was added by TomCat4680 in [2] but wasn't used in the output until [3] because the data is mismatched. There are currently 343 x values but only 331 y values so the 12 last x values are ignored. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. Thanks for figuring it out. TomCat4680 (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TomCat4680: I fixed the year but not the mismatch. There are still 12 more dates than case counts so the last 12 dates are ignored, and I guess many of the case counts are shown at a wrong date but haven't examined it. PrimeHunter (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: Yes and it says 2021 instead of January. I have no idea why. I didn't make the chart itself, I just keep it updated. Maybe it has something to do with the fact Michigan doesn't release stats on Sundays (they haven't since Memorial Day Labor Day) or major holidays (and the day before a few of them) though? I guess that'd be way more than 12 entries, but just an idea. TomCat4680 (talk) 10:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TomCat4680: You guessed right. Rmhermen added 12 Sundays from Sep 6 2020 to Nov 22 2020 in [4] without corresponding case counts. The same was done in the deaths graph. It was hard to spot because the diff is poor and it was done in the middle of the dates. I have fixed both graphs.[5][6] The deaths graph still had one more date than count. I fixed it in [7] after slowly tracking it down to another page the data was copied from. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: Great! Good work! Thanks for the help! TomCat4680 (talk) 15:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: Why'd you delete June 10's deaths? BTW, I mistakenly said they stopped reporting results on Sundays starting on Memorial Day earlier, but I checked and it was actually Labor Day (September 9), so June 10's death results were reported. [8]. TomCat4680 (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TomCat4680: I only deleted a date, not deaths. My edit summary explains it:
"remove Jun 10 2020 from deaths graph, was copied from COVID-19 pandemic in Michigan where it was added in Special:Diff/961855853 without a corresponding death count"
I spent a long time tracking down the mismatched date and didn't want to spend more time looking for a death count. PrimeHunter (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: There's sources for every single day since the pandemic reached Michigan (March 10) on the table at the bottom of the page. June 10 had 13 new deaths and there was 5,711 total deaths then per the link I added above. TomCat4680 (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TomCat4680: Then just add the date and count. I only worked to fix the graphs. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@PrimeHunter: Already did. I don't see any other missing dates either so problem solved. TomCat4680 (talk) 16:05, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Rmhermen (talk) 23:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why birth year mentioned in article Sidney Weintraub (economist, born 1914) name?[edit]

Why birth year mentioned in article Sidney Weintraub (economist, born 1914) name? Rizosome (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)][reply]

To distinguish him from Sidney Weintraub (economist, born 1922), Rizosome. --ColinFine (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning alert[edit]

Hi, today I was warned that if I continued to cancel the AfD alert I would be blocked. I do mea culpa. But my question is this: "If I received another such warning but on another subject would I be blocked?" Dr Salvus (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Salvus The warning says "You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice", not "You will be blocked". It is up to an administrator to decide whether a block is needed, based on the Wikipedia:Blocking policy. The block would be based on editing behaviour not simply on the basis of receiving a certain number of warnings. TSventon (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@TSventon: Ok thanks, now I feel calmer. Dr Salvus (talk) 18:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warn Alert 2[edit]

Hi. Today I received (quite rightly) a warning that if I continued of delete the AfD alert I would be banned. I have made more than 2,300 edits to this encyclopedia all in good faith and when I'm wrong I always apologize. I would like to know if such a warning could harm a user? I ask you because since I received this notice I started to be afraid of editing Wikipedia as I always had before the warning. Dr Salvus (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr Salvus: Your question is answered above, unless I am missing something. RudolfRed (talk) 18:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Layout[edit]

How can I make a text body on one side and put a table on the other to make it look more organized? When I use text and a table, it comes out like this:

Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah blah blah

Party registration as of October 24, 2020[1]
Party Total voters Percentage
Unenrolled 2,739,426 56.92%
Democratic 1,534,549 31.88%
Republican 476,480 9.90%
Other 39,564 0.80%
Libertarian 19,097 0.40%
Green-Rainbow 3,793 0.08%
Total 4,812,909 100%

References

  1. ^ "Registration Statistics". Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth. Retrieved February 20, 2021.
{| class=wikitable style="float:right"
Trappist the monk (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks!Chutyo (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum age[edit]

What is the minimum age to be a Wikipedian? I ask for a friend Dr Salvus (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr Salvus: There is none. But young readers and their parents should read WP:YOUNG, and additionally for parents there is Wikipedia:Advice_for_parents RudolfRed (talk) 18:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RudolfRed: If a user is a minor, must this be declared? Dr Salvus (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A minor, or a dog, may edit without mentioning the fact. A robot must, I think, declare that is one, and give the username of its controller. Maproom (talk) 19:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably better that a minor doesn't disclose it, given how dodgy some people on the internet can be.PrincessPersnickety (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Dr Salvus: A minor is not required to declare that they are a minor, and in fact, it's probably a good idea that they not tell people they are a minor or reveal their age. They should, however, read WP:YOUNG as RudolfRed describes. 331dot (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If they are a dog however, probably a good idea to declare it somewhere. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 22:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a new page[edit]

How exactly do u create a new page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flash Lloyd (talkcontribs) 20:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Flash Lloyd: The welcome message at the head of your talk page has some links which may help you but the guide to article creation can be found at WP:YFA. There is also a useful guide to beginning a draft at User:Ian.thomson/Howto. Please go via WP:WIZ or WP:AFC to create an item in draftspace. (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox draft[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fifitrixibell/sandbox

I have just added my first article to Wikipedia on the page above and I obviously missed the section on headings as it has called it my Sandbox address. Cant now work out how to get back to change the header. Can you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fifitrixibell (talkcontribs) 20:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fifitrixibell: Hello, what you done is create a draft in your sandbox which although not ideal is an acceptable place to start working on a topic. However, the draft as it stands would not be accepted into the encyclopedia. Please review the guide to article creation and the notability guidelines at WP:NMUSIC. The draft contains no proper references which are required both for verification and to establish notability. Please see WP:REFB for how to add these. External links are not permitted within the content; perhaps some of these could be converted into references... Titles of pages are changed by moving the page to a new location. This can be found via the 'more' tab at the top of the page but will not be available to you until your account is at least 4 days old and you have made at least 10 valid edits. Some useful links will be left at your talk page. Please study them carefully. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello Wikipedia. What can I do if someone is reverting things with no reason and I think that it is a hate for the specific topic that I discuss? For example the same guy has tried to mess around with other people too (as far as I see) with the same subject or whatever. Can I just report him? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holloman123 (talkcontribs) 21:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holloman123 Please engage the other editor in discussion on the article talk page, and please assume good faith and not that others are acting out of hatred. For example, if you feel an article needs to specifically call out that some wonders are Greek, please make a logical case for doing so, preferably based in Wikipedia guidelines. 331dot (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And be aware that if you report other editors it could rebound back on you. 331dot (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir I talked to him on talk page I'm waiting for response, thanks for your reply tho, have a nice day you and your family :^) User talk:Holloman123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holloman123 (talkcontribs) 21:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

lack of information on John R. Gregg, Author[edit]

I would like to know why you do not have information on John R. Gregg, Scholar and Professor. I know materials requesting a page on him have been submitted several times.

proposed content

He has been recommended by the Futurist Ray Kurzweil several times JOHN RANDALL GREGG WAS BORN IN 1945 IN CAMP BLANDING FLORIDA .HE WAS EDUCATED AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA AND RECEIVED ADVANCED DEGREES AT FLORID ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY IN HISTORY AND ANTHROPOLOGY

HE IS BEST KNOW FOR WRITING THE VAST EPIC: SEX, THE ILLUSTRATED HISTORY THROUGH TIME, RELIGION AND CULTURE. CONSISTING OF THREE VOLUMES . WITH MODERN HONESTY IT EXAMINES HUMAN SEXUALITY THROUGH ALL AVAILABLE CULTURES FROM PREHISTORY AND THE ANCIENT WORLD MOVING INTO THE MODERN ERA IN ALL CULTURES. THE VOLUMES EXAMINE CLOSELY, AND CONTROVERSIALLY THE ROLES OF RELIGION IN ITS CONTROL OF SEX AND THE EXPLOITATION OF WOMEN AND BOYS THROUGHOUT MOST CULTURES. THIS WORK HAS BEEN HAILED BY THE LGBTQ COMMUNITY AS THE FIRST GENDER HONEST HISTORY OF SEX.

He is the author of 4 modern volumes which have caused great controversy because of their direct honesty and revolutionary gender approach 

1. Sex, The Illustrated History: Through Time, Religion, and Culture, Volume I, Sex in the Ancient World, Early Europe Through the Renaissance and Islam. 339 pages

2. Sex, The illustrated History :Through Time, Religion, and Culture, Volume II Sex in Asia, Australia, Africa, The South Pacific and The Indigenous Americas. 274 pages 3. Sex, The Illustrated History: Through Time. Religion,. And Culture, Volume IIL Sex in The Modern World: 17th to The 21st Century, Europe and Colonial North and South America. (World Slavery, Trafficking, Church Abuse, LGBTQ History). 267 pages

4. Sex The World History; Through Time, Religion and Culture. 471 pages.

Are the works to controversial for Wikipedia, because they give ample evidence that Most human cultures have been bisexual ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by John R. Gregg (talkcontribs) 20 February 2021 22:44 (UTC)


There is a draft here Draft:John R. Gregg which has not been submitted, but it is very poorly formatted, has no independent reliable sources and zero chance of being accepted unless it is vastly improved. Theroadislong (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@John R. Gregg: No, it's not because this person's work is controversial. It's because the only attempts to create and article (by you, apparently) have not resulted in an acceptable article. -Arch dude (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@John R. Gregg: There is considerable information about the problems on your talk page, which is at User talk:John R. Gregg. Please read this information and the links provided there. If you have questions about that material, come back here. -Arch dude (talk) 02:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]