Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2002 (U.S.)/archive1

List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2002 (U.S.)

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for February 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review to check the quality of the prose.

Thanks, Efe (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments from Another Believer: This looks good, but I have a couple quick/easy suggestions:

• In other lists, you have "digital sales" as a factor. Did this not apply in 2002?

• Billboard started counting digital sales in 2004. --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• A reference indicating how data is compiled would help.

• I'll try to find, but are they that helpful? --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• "Rapper Eminem achieved his first chart-topping single with "Lose Yourself" since he began his career in 1990"... I think this might be better: "Rapper Eminem achieved his first chart-topping single since he began his career in 1990 with "Lose Yourself".

• Reworded to: "The ascent of "Lose Yourself" to number one gave rapper Eminem achieved his first chart-topping single since he began releasing albums in 1999." --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• later - change to "latter"

• Rectified. --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Consider linking "soundtrack" (last paragraph)

• Linked. --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• For the first reference listed at the bottom, I would recommend linking Billboard and Nielsen Business Media, Inc (you can link it to Nielsen Company). This may not be required, but it seems to be fairly common practice and I find it helpful sometimes, as a reader.

• Done. --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• A couple additional artists pictures along the side would look nice, just to rid some of the white space. Looks good to me! -Another Believer (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• Will add one. --Efe (talk) 07:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Looks good! -Another Believer (talk) 23:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)