Language desk
< March 26	<< Feb \| March \| Apr >>	March 28 >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

March 27

grammatical term

I'm looking for a grammatical term or expression. In the phrase red car, red is an adjective. In the phrases portrait paintings, leadership styles, assault battalion, portrait, leadership, battalion are nouns but they have a function similar to an adjective. There is a term or a grammatical expression for this kind of words or function? Also, the present principle can be a gerund: "typing techniques", with the same function. Thanks--Pierpao (talk) 09:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's called an attributive noun or noun adjunct. --76.71.6.254 (talk) 09:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict):This use of a noun as an adjective is called "attributive" use of the noun, and the word retains its designation as a noun. It does not become a genuine adjective if the comparative and superlative forms do not exist. See Noun adjunct. Dbfirs 09:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~That's the best and simplest explanation of them I've ever seen. Thanks.~~ Turns out that was somewhat simplistic. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 10:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot User:Dbfirs and in typing techniques or walking paths, typing and walking are what? Attributive verbs or attributive gerunds?--Pierpao (talk) 10:36, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question! "Walking" has been used as a noun since the fourteenth century, and "typing" (with an older meaning) since the seventeenth century, so I'd say that they were well-established as nouns to be used attributively. Dbfirs 11:17, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say they always were nouns. The participial usage replaces a lost older participle form (represented by German –end); the archaic a-walking is eroded from on walking. Or so I misunderstand. —Tamfang (talk) 03:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dbfirs: "It does not become a genuine adjective if the comparative and superlative forms do not exist" — that is only one of several criteria used to test whether a given word is an adjective. None of the criteria is satisfied by all adjectives, although many adjectives satisfy all criteria. See UCL.ac.uk or Herbst p.162-3. jnestorius^(talk) 14:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jnestorius:: My test was for nouns used attributively, and I believe it is an accurate test for the question asked by the OP. I agree that not all adjectives have a comparative and a superlative. Dbfirs 14:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In short, every word having a comparative/superlative is an adjective, but not vice versa (i.e. not every adjective etc.). HOTmag (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No: adverbs often have comparative/superlative. jnestorius^(talk) 09:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colloquial Arabic imperatives

How is the imperative of w-initial verbs like "wiṣil/yūṣal" (arrive) or "wiqiʿ/yūqaʿ" (fall) formed in Levantine and/or Egyptian? --Lazar Taxon (talk) 22:59, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing in Arabic that I was taught in the IDF, is that the imperative for "stop" (waqaf/yaqif, MSA imperative qif) in the Palestinian Arabic is waqef. --31.168.166.163 (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazar Taxon: Syrian, Egyptian.--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 19:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]