Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 October 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

U.S. athlete Julie Zetlin[edit]

Hello, this is a feedback request for an entry about U.S. rhythmic gymnast Julie Zetlin. I have recently added an infobox; wikified terms; rewritten the lede; and improved citations. I would like to request that this article be reviewed, with an eye toward whether the wikification tag can be removed. Thanks!

Seandalytx (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed by Ma®©usBritish [Chat • RFF] 22:52, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • References 1, 4, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 16 to 19 are all the same link - why don't you just give the first cited use a ref name and pass it to the rest to economise the code used?
  • Same with 3 and 15 - group into one ref, and 2 and 12 also.
 Done + cleanup of refs.

I stumbled upon the existing article for RT! last night and it jumped out at me as needing some cleanup. I've made a copy of the article in my userspace as User:DennisIsMe/RT! and tweaked it so it's a bit more neutral (and includes less text directly from his MySpace page), but before I push my changes to the live version, I wanted to get some feedback.

Please note that I was focused entirely on cleanup and not on finding sources for any of the claims that I left behind. I've tagged the whole thing as unreferenced so the gaps can be filled in after the cleanup is done.

Thanks in advance for any advice that can be offered. DennisIsMe (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Review New Article[edit]

I just created Hanging With Friends and would appreciate it if someone could review the article and consider removing the "unreviewed article" tag. Thanks in advance.

JovanWelks (talk) 21:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done mabdul 14:19, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The article submitted is derived from a research paper and has large implications for parents and students. What must we do to make it notable enough for Wikipedia?

I'm sorry if I am being dense but it's my first time here and only listed data that is cited on the research report.

Many thanks, Steven

Stevenpq (talk) 22:30, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the article so that it can be untagged as needing verification.

46.190.64.243 (talk) 23:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]