Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rejected/21

Click 'show' to view an index of all archives

Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)

Rejected mediation request pages

Category:Kurdistan

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 22:22, March 23 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Category:Kurdistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-02-03 Category:Kurdistan
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography (mediation case above is linked)

Issues to be mediated

Categorization of articles with Category:Kurdistan and its sub categories

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree.-- Cat ^chi? 22:29, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, why not. Khoi khoi 04:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Bertilvidet 11:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Rejected: All parties did not agree within 7 day timeframe.

For the mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 03:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

School of Education

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 23:31, March 30 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Freechild (talk · contribs)
Skaraoke (talk · contribs)

Articles involved

School of Education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Teaching for social justice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
The Freechild Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
User talk:Theowannabe#Re: Sockpuppetry Accusations (edit | [[Talk:User talk:Theowannabe#Re: Sockpuppetry Accusations|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freechild Project (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Freechild Project|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

After making wild accusations about me personally here and marking a page I have edited with AfD here, User:Skaraoke refused to allow the edits I contributed to a page he created here. I have clearly established my interest and expertise in this area via past edits; User:Skaraoke is apparently a new WP user. After a few days of his continued and slanderous attacks, I brought the issue to WP:MEDCAB. After this, User:Skaraoke continued his slanderous accusations, with strong indications that he introduced sockpuppets onto WP. After other editors pointed this out here, User:Skaraoke attacked them on that page, and even on one of their own talk pages. After a day User:Skaraoke took the tag off of School of Education twice, and has now stated that he will not participate in any voluntary mediation process. I understand that this is that, as well; however, I am left without recourse. So my issues are: (1) Personal slander; (2) Edit wars; (3) AfDing a page in retribution for Talk page comments; (4) Attacking other editors, and; (5) Refusal to participate in mediation via the Mediation Cabal. - Freechild 23:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional issues to be mediated

The legitimacy of the AfD at this article, which User:Skaraoke introduced in order to attack me personally.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. - Freechild 23:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree - Skaraoke 02:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Rejected, parties fail to agree to mediation. However, upon looking into it, I feel that both users should take a step back, calm down, and breathe a bit deeper before proceeding. Civil discussion and a some good old assumption of good faith could get this problem resolved and nip it in the bud before it gets out of hand.

For the Mediation Committee ^demon^{[omg plz]} 03:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mudaliar

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 03:07, March 27 2007 (UTC)

Mudaliar

Issues to be mediated

In article, Mudaliar which is a title used by many grousps, group Sengunthar is being slandered against while groups like Kondai Katti Vellala are being deleted.
In articles, Sengunthar , Sengundhar, kaikolar, Kaikolan, the group Sengunthar is being slandered and vandalized by User:mudaliar and his socks. A check user has revealed that he is using socks for over a period of 4 months. These 4 are exact identical articles and need to be merged. [1]
In article, Devadasi, slandering of Sengunthar is happening. It is being falsely claimed that Sengunthar / Kaikolar are the origin of all devadasis throught India, when infact the name of the group is called Isai Vellala, who had been using Kaikolar name for hiding their origin as Vellala. This editing started only after the revert wars in article Mudaliar proving that the edits are maliciously motivated.

Additional issues to be mediated

Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree Venki 03:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree The Behnam 10:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Reject: All parties did not agree within 7 days.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 16:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vbulletin

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 02:24, April 4 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Vbulletin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/VBulletin

Issues to be mediated

the External Links section

Additional issues to be mediated

Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. Scotsmist 02:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree - Already mediated Joeychgo 04:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Reject, parties do not agree to mediation. In addition, we attempted this previously and got nowhere. I recommend WP:3O.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 10:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wilma Blasini Perez

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 00:09, April 1 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Wilma Blasini Perez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Zuleyka Rivera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Please discussion page for Wilma Blasini Perez

Issues to be mediated

Official name of individual is Wilma Blasini. An editor stated Uma as an alias, howeveer the Puerto Rican press has always called her Wilma and not by her supposed Uma alias.
Aliases for beauty queens such as one stated for Marisol Malaret and Barbara Palacios have never affected the article's titling, therefore same should be applied to this article as well.

Additional issues to be mediated

All links should be directed to Wilma Blasini Perez and not empty article Uma Blasini
Other editors must stop reverting article to blank links until matter is resolved.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. XLR8TION (talk · contribs)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Reject, parties did not agree within 7 days.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 18:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I moved a comment by After Midnight regarding this RfM to the talk page. Daniel Bryant 05:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic military jurisprudence

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 21:36, April 5 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Islamic military jurisprudence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

RfC

Issues to be mediated

Whether requiring citations of actual judicial opinions is appropriate in article as a whole, and specifically in section concerning sex with female captives
Whether section concerning sex with female captives is adequately sourced, given article's focus on jurisprudence
What constitutes Islamic jurisprudence (and what doesn't)
How exactly can the Quran be quoted, and what sort of sources are needed to support an argument?

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. BYT 21:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Bless sins 00:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. [Commentary removed by Daniel.Bryant; see history] NN 18:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

Reject, parties do not agree to mediation.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel Bryant 05:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nadine Gordimer

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 01:14, April 8 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Nadine Gordimer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (section)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

Lengthy Discussion on Talk:Nadine Gordimer/Archive 2, Talk:Nadine Gordimer/Archive 3
Request for Comments Talk:Nadine Gordimer/Archive 2#RfC
Survey conducted Talk:Nadine Gordimer#Another version

Issues to be mediated

Should any mention of the robbery and attack of Nadine Gordimer on October 26, 2006, be included on the page?
If so, should any mention of the race of the thieves be included?
If so to both of the above, should R.W. Johnson's quote finding "grim irony" in the attack be included [2]?

Additional issues to be mediated

None listed.

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree. Andyparkerson 01:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
agree. Doldrums 04:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
agree. lquilter 14:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't disagree but don't have time to participate. DianaW 01:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
70.23.199.239 (talk · contribs) disagrees on talk page - diff (posted by User:Lquilter)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

Reject, parties do not agree to mediation.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel Bryant 05:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Irving

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 22:15, April 16 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

David Irving (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Request for comment [[3]]

Issues to be mediated

Should the phrase "Irving's status as a historian has been widely discredited" be re-worded?

Additional issues to be mediated

Additional issue 1
Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree.Wikidudeman ^(talk) 22:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. My time is somewhat limited, though. And I object to the (threat of) removal of signed comments. --Stephan Schulz 22:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree.Phonemonkey 22:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. The RFC clearly showed a consensus for the existing text per Jayjg's numerous citations. There were none disputing Irving status as discredited. I don't see what the point of this would be. <<-armon->> 23:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

If everyone who commented in the RfC has been added as a party here, then I suugest a speedy re-draft, unless these people actually are disputants. Mart inp23 22:38, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[4] Thanks, Mart inp23 22:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected. It appears to me that consensus has already been formed via the RFC, however I could be wrong.

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 00:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Attack Sites

This is a hard copy of a request for mediation which was rejected by the Mediation Committee. Rejected requests are substituted to these archives of rejected requests, then deleted. Please do not remove this tag or edit this request for any reason. To request mediation of this dispute, please submit a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 19:27, April 12 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

Articles involved

Wikipedia:Attack sites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Wikipedia:Request for arbitration (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

User talk discussion

Issues to be mediated

Personal Attacks

Additional issues to be mediated

Catch-22 suppression of links and deletion of an entire edit to talk page

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

SqueakBox 19:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Mangoe 03:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-mediators should not edit this section.

Reject, parties did not agree to mediation within 7 days.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel Bryant 02:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by mediator(s):

SqueakBox is obviously agreeing to mediation (as he filed it), but Mangoe, are you agreeing? Daniel Bryant 14:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Mangoe 14:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Mangoe and I have nothing to mediate between the 2 of us. Denny hasnt edited since the 13th, and Denny is the only editor whom I have issues with that I would like to see resolved in mediation. The Mangoe/Crum issue is different, SqueakBox 20:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]