Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 270

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 265 ← Archive 268 Archive 269 Archive 270 Archive 271 Archive 272 → Archive 275

David R. Hawkins

There might be some inappropriate contents in the page according to wikipedia policies, which can be left for further revision. But the entry should not be deleted, since there is a same-name entry in German Wikipedia, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_R._Hawkins, suggesting it is an appropriate entry according to Wikipedia policies. —- talk 22:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Hawkins (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Zhongchuxiong, each Wikipedia is separate, and any deletion discussion here would trump the simple fact that it exists on another project, which really provides little precedent because of the way Wikipedia operates. See by analogy, WP:WAX. That being said, if the foreign language article contains content that if translated, would address the basis for deletion at the discussion (which here was notability concerns) it certainly might be a good basis for a recreation that would not be subject to CSD G4 as a "repost". It is also true here that the [2nd] deletion discussion was five years ago, so if, for example, there has been significant treatment of the subject in the types of reliable, secondary, independent, published sources that evidence notability in the intervening period, a new article using those sources would invalidate any G4, but the rub is that a repost cannot be a stub, or just contain the prior content. It must show the deletion discussion basis is no longer applicable. Regarding the canned template I posted above, if any request were to be made at Wikipedia:Deletion review, I would suggest any such nomination would be predominantly under the idea that "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page"—which would the be supported by disclosing those suitable sources that have come into existence in the interim. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Fuhghettaboutit, thanks for your detailed explanation. Pursuant to your explanation that this article was deleted on the basis of notability concerns, I've found a biography of this person written in 2012 by an independent author. Would that source be adequate for restoring this article? (Jeffrey, Scott. 2012. Doctor of Truth, The Life of David R. Hawkins. Creative Crayon Publishers) Bests--Zhongchuxiong(talk) 16:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Linnon Stylz

Page did not have an updated source for a media listing for the artist. Promo Only. Attempted the update late. —Michicanna (talk) 19:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Download

I, Velox14724, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Velox14724 (talk) 02:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Scott Trowbridge

I, Inasea, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Inasea (talk) 03:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Umahoysala/sandbox/Garudanagiri Nagaraj

I, Umahoysala, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Umahoysala (talk) 08:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

John Layfield bullying and harassment allegations

Please give me a copy of this article in my user space, as I'd like to work more on it and improve it. —Pinguinn 🐧 17:53, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:WestRock Company

Please restore so that I can then redirect to WestRock and the page history of the work that was done on the Draft version will be maintained. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:WestRock Company

Requesting FOR THE THIRD TIME with no action: please restore so that I can then redirect to WestRock and the page history of the work that was done on the Draft version will be maintained. UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Eúgèñė

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below — — Preceding unsigned comment added by IVFiPodTouch (talk • contribs) 12:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Rejected This was purportedly the "autobiograpy" of a character in a non-notable (possibly hoax) video game variant. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

File:A. A. Gill BBC 2012.jpg

I discussed the image with Mifter, who deleted the image as orphaned. Actually, the image was removed by another admin, with whom I discussed the image. Right now, Mifter is taking a break at the moment. May you undelete the image, reinsert it into A. A. Gill, and then take it to FFD please? —George Ho (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Reading statements that BBC's operations in the US "are not non-profit", I wonder whether it's worth it. --George Ho (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Done, restored per request. ℯxplicit 00:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Russians people in Israel

This talk page should be undeleted and moved to Talk:Russian people in Israel with no redirect left behind. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Done, restored and moved as requested. ℯxplicit 00:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Edward Forchion

Previously deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Forchion(2nd nomination). Have subsequently created article Ed Forchion. Would like to see if there is any information or references of interest. Will then make restored article a redirect.Djflem (talk) 08:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC) —Djflem (talk) 08:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Convergent Design

I, Pattymooney, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patty Mooney (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Grist (literary journal)

I, 24.151.85.145, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.151.85.145 (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Joe DeRouen

I, Donaldvista, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Donald Vista (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Untitled, Art

File:Phenomblue logo.png

I changed the licensing status to "PD-logo", so the previous revision should be undeleted. Also, the image is of the US company, whose article is deleted. —George Ho (talk) 21:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Jared Keylon

Deleted under WP:SOFTDELETE, since meets WP:NRODEO there is presumption that it meets WP:GNG and should be kept —RonSigPi (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Software Toolworks

I, Bilofsky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bilofsky (talk) 22:54, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Onyx Tavern

I, Rick lay95, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rick lay95 (talk) 23:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Fleurieu Folk Festival

I, BrettWJensen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BrettWJensen (talk) 23:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Natan Friedland

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Edgfeinberg (talk) 01:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC) 2=The article was rejected for lack of adequate references. I could not speedily work on it at that time and left it too long. It was deleted in March 2017. I have time to work this summer on it and hoped to get it back to do do.

Draft:Robert Diamant, FAIA

I, 24.7.67.225, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.7.67.225 (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

European Foundation for South Asian Studies

The page is about a non-profit think thank that promotes peace and security in the world, like other organisations such as Unicef and The Clingendael Institute (which have wikipedia pages as well), I think it is very important to have a page about this since it actually helps to make the world a better place and people can learn about it and maybe be inspired to do similar things in their own lives. —J.barakova1978 (talk) 08:23, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Crowdspeaking

I, Kynerion, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kynerion (talk) 08:52, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I, Kynerion, think Wikipedia should be a neutral resource for the term "crowdspeaking", for now considered as a neologism, with a rising amount of requests from search engines. Instead of that, commercial platforms are monopolizing the results, and one of them has already its Wikipedia page (see Thunderclap) —Kynerion (talk) 09:04, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

File:George Institute.png

I re-tagged the logo as free to use in the US. Unsure about Australia as its original standards are very low, like that of the UK. However, I noticed that there were previous revisions of the image, so they should be undeleted. —George Ho (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Comparison of font editors

I, John doe 120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —john doe 120 (talk) 12:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Mark Stanley (guitarist)

I, Walrus Boot, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Walrus Boot (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Hampshire Scout Expeditions

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpricy93 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Mpricy93, You will find the text in your user space at User:Mpricy93/Hampshire Scout Expeditions. However, so as not to waste your time, before doing any more work on it, please find several published independent articles about the organization (news or magazine reports, not press releases or the group's website) and limit the information in the article to what is published in these, not what people in the organization want to publicize.—Anne Delong (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Betty Van Patter

I, Berksee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SunriseSam (talk) 17:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Study Plan

I, Dpammm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dpammma (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Adam Ray (actor)

Katyhansen89 (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Kabir Ruma Babangida

The page was created as new no copy from any website or wikipedia page, lease restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Awwal1st (talk) 19:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done The article was deleted because it was blatantly promotional. It would require a complete rewrite; it's easier to start over than to try and salvage that page. Huon (talk) 20:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Stephan Rothlin

Ladanyi-verein (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

User:BC1278/Caryn Marooney2

I, BC1278, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BC1278 (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Southside Comets Football Club

I, Hoey906, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hoey906 (talk) 00:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Kevin Johnston

The article was deleted about 10 years ago. I have recently created a new article about the same individual as he is now a YouTuber who is garnering significant news coverage in Canada (he became a YouTuber sometime after the previous article's deletion). I'd like to have the previous article undeleted so as to restore the history and also in case there is any material that is usable in the current article. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC) —Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

The deleted content was unsourced BLP content, which we're not gonna restore. (Assuming it's even the same guy.) It also reeked of self-promotion. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:51, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Is it possible for me to see it? It's possible sources can be found for the basic content (without the self-promotion). I've just set an email address with my account. Hungarian Phrasebook (talk) 00:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
How do you know the content deleted 10 years ago has anything to do with your subject? Super common name. Legacypac (talk) 05:18, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Winthroopstan

This is a micronation. It is not a hoax or vandalism. This page is very important to me, because it is my micronation, and I would like the page back. There are many other pages of micronations on here, so why delete mine? —Winden89 (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

The bar for articles on micro nations is pretty high. You just confirmed the other deletion reason "08:49, 22 May 2017 Kusma (talk | contribs) deleted page Winthroopstan(A11: Made up by article creator or an associate, and no indication of importance/significance" by stating it belongs fo you. Wikipedia is not the proper outlet to promote your pet project. Legacypac (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Two articles: Geometry template & Mathomat

Geometry template · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Mathomat · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Can the article Geometry template be undeleted, it was PRODed, so that I can do a tidy up in relation to:

Or, if attribution is not an issue here, then copy the content to User:Aoziwe/sandbox/Geometry template for me to work on it.

Also, can the content of the previous, deleted, version of Mathomat be copied to User:Aoziwe/sandbox/Mathomat (old) for me to work on it.

Subject to what is there and what else I can find, I am at this time presuming I will have one article with a couple of redirects, if an article is warranted after I review all the material available.

Thanks. Aoziwe (talk) 13:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done for the moment. See comments at the AfD.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Fuhghettaboutit. Any movement as a result of the apparent general agreement to fix / concatenate the histories as per your suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathomat (2nd nomination), and anything else as per Spinningspark at the AfD too. Aoziwe (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

@Aoziwe Sorry! I sometimes have too much stuff going on and forget something. My apologies. I am at work and only have a few minutes and cannot do this with the care it requires right now. I will do this after work, today; that's a promise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:29, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
No problem at all. We (most of us) have day jobs and are volunteers! Take the time you need. It is just that it all went very quite and I was not sure what might be happening. Consensus is a wonderful thing when it is clear, but it is not always. Cheers. Aoziwe (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Fuhghettaboutit. I see you have done some work. Sorry but I am not clear, have you finished? Regards. Aoziwe (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey Aoziwe. Yes, everything was done the same day as my message above. I thought maybe I'd help by finding and adding sources. However, I looked for sources on the general "geometry template" topical scope (albeit, not a very deep dive; I spent maybe a half hour) and really found little, so it may be that it should be returned by a move back to the more restrictive title focused upon Mathomat (or maybe "Mathomat and MathAid, or something similar depending on what exists). By the way, given the Australia connection, I performed searches of both Trove (a digitization project of the National Library of Australia with over 5,000,000 Australian newspaper pages) and Papers Past (a digitization project of the National Library of New Zealand; over 2,000,000 New Zealand newspaper pages) and found little, but part of the problem is that searches of "mathomat" find huge numbers of false-positives for "mathomatics" and "mathomatician", despite the change from an "e" to an "o", and I saw no easy was to bypass that.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Fuhghettaboutit. Yep know all about trove! I will start to see what I can do with Mathomat/Geometry template. Are you going to close off the AfD? Aoziwe (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

DJ Many

Care To Restore That Page About Me... I Think I'm Notable Now This Article In Inc. (magazine) Explains http://www.inc.com/john-boitnott/how-to-use-your-talent-to-attract-the-attention-of-major-brands.html Along With This Article In The American City Business Journals http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2016/03/14/dj-many-twitter-personality-emanuel-thomas.html Or You Could Always Just Google Me. Also I Now Have A Huge Cult Following Now With Over A Million Followers On Twitter http://Twitter.com/DJMany I Also Have A New Music Video On VEVO http://www.vevo.com/artist/dj-many With This Guy Donny Osmond Which Currently Has Over A Million Views Which Once Again Verifies My Cult Following. Wich Meets This Articles Guidelines https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers I Previously Failed This Because I Was Not Notable Back When My Page Was Deleted. I Would Think I Have Passed The Threshold Now. DJ Many56 (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Many (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Daniel (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲水 12:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Funk: The Music, the People and the Rhythm of The One

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Rickeyvincent77 (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Fixed submission, linked page. ~ GB fan 17:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Rickey Vincent is the name of the author of this book. Just sayin'.... --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Done The book may be notable, but the text will need neutralizing and referencing. Rickeyvincent77, since you have a conflict of interest, be sure to submit the improved draft for review by pressing the large blue button, so that an uninvolved editor can judge its readiness for the encyclopedia.—Anne Delong (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adaptive Filtering by Optimal Projection

I, Samuelboudet, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samuelboudet (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Samuelboudet, the draft is now at: Draft:Adaptive filtering by optimal projection. However, before it will be accepted into the encyclopedia, you will need to show that "Adaptive Filtering by Optimal Projection" is a term in common use by others besides you and those working with you, and that it has been written about extensively in a number of independent published sources. Otherwise, the term will be considered a Wikipedia:Neologism and the article will not be accepted.—Anne Delong (talk) 23:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Adaptive filtering by optimal projection

I, Samuelboudet, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samuelboudet (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

  • I responded to a previous request for this same draft further up the page.—Anne Delong (talk) 00:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Deepak Dubey

I, Drdubey27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drdubey27 (talk) 12:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done The linked page was not an Articles for creation submission, nor was it deleted under CSD G13. It was an article deleted under criterion A7. When you posted this request there was a message in bold type saying "Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here." The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

De'Andre Bush

It was deleted because it had the bio of a living person. This is my first time and I know usually publicist does this but I wanted to do it myself, though I see it has to be from a neutral standpoint. But I had very minimal things on there. I had my IMDB info to verify but I didn't know how and where to do things or submit. I want it undeleted so I can recover the info I put in there so I can get it on my personal website. And, if possible, get those sources over so I can have it up for good? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VISQ (talk • contribs) 05:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done Wikipedia is not a medium to help people to publicise themselves. You should also read the guidelines on conflict of interest. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

United CoolAir Corporation

My page was wrongfully deleted after only being posted for 2 minutes. There is no way my post was reviewed to see if content was accurate. There is a category in Wikipedia Called “HVAC Manufacturing Companies”, many of our competitors have a presence on your site. AAON, Daikin, Johnson Controls, Trane and York International all have a presence on Wikipedia. There are other companies listed that nobody has ever heard of. Nothing in what I wrote was promotional or sales jargon. Just facts about an American company that has existed for almost 30 years that creates a unique product. We were written about in a notable and reliable publication (Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News June 27, 2016) I respectfully disagree with judgment and ask that my post be reinstated. —ColdAir (talk) 13:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Your comments are not showing how your own subject satisfies the main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not so anything else will not be negotiable; the page was promotional which is in fact deleted onsight. Whether the information was facts is also not a negotiable about this. However, if you can show there's significant independent news uninfluenced by the company, we can consider it. SwisterTwister talk 02:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done Wikipedia is not a medium for helping businesses to publicise themselves. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Asahd Khaled

Please restore page, user:RickinBaltimore. A wiki user deleted this page Asahd Khaled because he claimed there was no significance.

Asahd does meet the requirements set by Wikipedia though.

WP:ENTERTAINER

Has had SIGNIFICANT roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions -- exec producer on the album, also produced the song "shining".

WP:MUSICBIO Wiki rules state a person must have at least 1 of the 12 requirements for notability. Asahd has 3.

1. Has been the subject of MULTIPLE, non-trivial, PUBLISHED works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.

2. Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.

3. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AjayTO (talk • contribs) 20:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Comment - none of the information above was mentioned in the article, with or without reliable sources. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done Neither in the article nor here has any evidence of notability been provided. Mere assertions of notability without evidence are not enough. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Martin Dow

Article was deleted per G7. I contributed to the article as an IP before I made my account. Article has already survived an AfD request. —Mfarazbaig (talk) 06:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Done The deletion was totally wrong, as there were substantial edits which were not by the creator of the article. It is difficult to see how Anthony Appleyard, who deleted the article, can have failed to see that, unless he deleted the article without checking its history, which I hope no administrator would ever do. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Martin Dow should also be undeleted. --George Ho (talk) 09:16, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @Mfarazbaig and JamesBWatson: I deleted Martin Dow at 08:21, 2 May 2017 because at 07:41, 2 May 2017‎ User:Shaheeraharoon (who also made its first edit, and several edits since) speedy-delete-tagged it {{db-author}}. I have now undeleted it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  • @George Ho: At 09:29, 26 May 2017 User:Athaenara deleted it "One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: page creator tagged for deletion, was probably eligible for WP:CSD G11, more at User talk:Shaheeraharoon.". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Timetable:
    1. 08:21, 2 May 2017 Anthony Appleyard deleted page Martin Dow (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND) (view/restore)
    2. 09:06, 26 May 2017 JamesBWatson restored page Martin Dow (51 revisions) (Reverting improper deletion, as tehre was not just one author. Restoration requested at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion.)
    3. 09:29, 26 May 2017 Athaenara deleted page Martin Dow (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: page creator tagged for deletion, was probably eligible for WP:CSD G11, more at User talk:Shaheeraharoon) (view/restore)
    4. 09:37, 26 May 2017 Anthony Appleyard restored page Martin Dow (52 revisions) (asked)

Draft:Left_Hand_Right_Hand

Erasmusgreen (talk) 13:34, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

@Erasmusgreen: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 11:35, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Justin Tyler

User meets WP:N —Spiritualasf (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Articles that were deleted by community input are not restored unless otherwise convincing but, considering you started a Draft, that should be sufficient space because it's simply no different from the community-imposed deletion. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Tyler, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user SoWhy (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 11:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Digital Social Innovation

Please restore the page as i will update it with additional references and examples of broader coverage / use of the term.

PETER

Peterbaeck (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Peterbaeck: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Walter van Dyk

I saw that the article had been deleted but felt it had been unfairly treated. I have recreated a draft with all the improvements needed for Wikipedia and I would like the article to be reviewed and if possible reopened. He is well known and respected in the theatre world —Spearshak (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC) talk 22:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)Spearshak (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Text of draft removed; this is not the place for a review. —C.Fred (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done Article was deleted as a result of AfD process. I don't see anything out of order with the AfD. No objections if Spearshak would like to create Draft:Walter van Dyk to try to work on an improved article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

The AFC reviewers need to see the deleted draft in order to verify that the current draft is better than the deleted article either be posted in user space (my user space will do) or emailed, so that I know that the new draft is better? Without the deleted version, I will have to assume that the new version is no improvement. I am not an administrator and can't see the deleted version. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
@Robert McClenon: The deleted version is word for word verbatim identical to the draft version. The only differences appear to be some minor paragraph formatting, and the contributors. Therefore I have deleted it in accordance with WP:CSD#G4. ~Anachronist (talk) 11:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. In that case, the submission of the draft, which was the same as the deleted article, was a waste of the time of the reviewers, and the proponent should not have submitted the draft until they had improved it. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Tinymogul/Heap Big Beef

I, Tinymogul, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tinymogul (talk) 02:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

@Tinymogul: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tripoley

I, Burt.kelner, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burt.kelner (talk) 18:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@Burt.kelner: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clarence Wheeler & The Enforcers

I, 45.48.163.79, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 45.48.163.79 (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Josef Eidenberger (artist)

I, EhrDesign, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. EhrDesign (talk) 03:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

@EhrDesign: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:New Media Vision

I, Mandymlall, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mandymlall (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@Mandymlall: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:UReveal, Inc

I, Williampsimon3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Williampsimon3 (talk) 14:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done Besides containing highly promotional content, the patent section at the least is copied and pasted from here, which inevitably makes me think other parts of the text are as well.---Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Logo of Iraqi News.png

Used on Iraqi News, per fair use policy. —Batternut (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done :@Batternut: I know it wasn't you but another user that placed it in the infobox at Iraqi News, but just note that when you place image syntax, if you place a colon before the file name, it makes the image into a link, rather than displaying the image (e.g. [[:File:name.jpg]], which is why, because it wasn't shown to be in use because of that colon, it got deleted as an orphaned fair use image. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Flont

Speedy Deletion under highly subjective G11 criteria, with no response to (and apparently no consideration of) detailed contestation in Talk. This is proof that WP:Why I Hate Speedy Deleters should be required reading for admins before they can participate in Speedy Deletion. I've created and improved dozens of articles, and it's admin actions like this (bullying really) that sap all interest in contributing to WP. CSD are intended for obvious cases where no doubt exists. Original nominator Cordless Larry admits uncertainty in talk. Flont was a short, factual, highly referenced article about a new but obviously notable company, directly referenced in three articles published in national print publications: Vogue, Women's Wear Daily, and Fast Company. Dozens of reliable, albeit lesser, publications also discuss the company. Two notable company founders, each with long standing and highly referenced WP articles. A new reference for a founder (to support the word "prominent") is a NY Times print article, with the founders name is in the headline itself! No reasonable consensus would agree to G11, but aggressive CSD undermines democracy. —Nixie9✉ 12:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

To clarify, I didn't admit uncertainty about my rationale for nominating the article for speedy deletion; I just stated that I can no longer see the article content to offer detailed comments on it. The nomination didn't concern notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Pinging Jimfbleak, who deleted the article, so that he is aware of this request. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
I notified Jimfbleak. I respectfully suggest that if you cannot state unequivocally that an article is not notable, you have no business nominating it for Speedy Deletion. Nixie9✉ 12:26, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Nixie9. Notability has nothing whatsoever to do with deletion under CSD G11. G11 is about the content being blatantly promotional, without relation to whether the topic is sufficiently notable to warrant a proper write-up. The same thing is true of other speedy deletion bases. Your objections here, on the basis of notability of the topic, would read no less like a non sequitur than if this was deleted as a copyright violation, and you said "...but it was a notable topic". The one has nothing to do with the other. Only WP:CSD#A7 predominantly, plus A9 and A11 bear any relationship to notability, though they are different (and lower) standards, and relate to the text present, rather than whether the topic is notable on the merits. The issue of whether the content was sufficiently blatantly promotional to warrant a deletion under G11 is another topic, but would have been a relevant focus.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:28, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Joshua Stein

I, BioHistoryFan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BioHistoryFan (talk) 05:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done. I am not saying it's impossible that, without any relationship to this law firm, you somehow struck upon on writing a (quite promotional reading, glowing) article on it, but it presents as just so unlikely. What is your relationship to this firm? Please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Until there's compliance, or you present an credible explanation I at least am unwilling to undelete this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Evesham Flats

Will address most recent feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by History devotee (talk • contribs) 02:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@History devotee: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:06, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

kappa phi gamma

The National Board of Kappa Phi Gamma Sorority, Inc. noticed that our page on wikipedia was deleted in November 2016. Our page was deleted for being "Non-notable sorority. Very small, no real national presence; only 5 chapters nationwide, not recognized by National Panhellenic Conference or any national Greek umbrella organization affiliation." We would like to have our page undeleted. We can rewrite the article and include more resources if need be, but it was unfair to be deleted off of the site for not being "notable". Our Sorority started less than 20 years ago unlike Greek organizations that are over 100 years old. We have 11 chapters and 5 colonies along with several alumnae chapters from Texas to Massachusetts. Kappa Phi Gamma is recognized by the National APIDA Panhellenic Association, all the universities that it is established at, and by the beneficiaries of their philanthropy. Please contact us if you have any questions or concerns. We request that our page is undeleted and that we are given the opportunity to improve our page. We are open to suggestions as long as we can have our page up again. Thank you for your time. —Kphigmarketing (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Done As a contested "soft deletion"—WP:Articles for deletion/Kappa Phi Gamma (2nd nomination) had little activity—the article was restored upon any request.
@Kphigmarketing: you need to be exceedingly careful that your edits maintain neutral point of view. It is a bad idea for an article to be edited by the organization's marketing director. —C.Fred (talk) 19:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Various School Logos

A number of logos for schools were removed (F5: Unused non-free media file) due to edits by blocked Alexander Iskandar reverted by Just Chilling. As it was deemed the articles should be restored I guess it would be valid for these to all be refunded as well.

I thought it was best to do these in one than individually.... it took long enough to compile the list without having to file each separately. Hope that's OK, Cheers —KylieTastic (talk) 15:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

KylieTastic  Done I restored them all. I was hoping that the orphan notice would automatically disappear, but it did not I don't know whether there is a bot that will check for that and remove it but if not someone has to do that manually or by batch if someone knows how to do that.--S Philbrick(Talk) 16:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
KylieTastic I cleared the template from the first 17, but looking for some help on the others--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sphilbrick, I thought a bot would have kicked in but no :/ So I've checked the rest and cleared that issue. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
KylieTastic That was quick, thanks.--S Philbrick(Talk) 22:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Snoopy Screenshot.png

Snoopy (video game) became a non-redirect article again. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: Since this was at AfD and the consensus was to redirect, I have undone the removal of the redirect and semi-protected.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

talk arun jagoji jambhulkar

content typing step by stepEnter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —117.200.209.5 (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:WestRock Company

Requesting FOR THE THIRD TIME with no action: please restore so that I can then redirect to WestRock and the page history of the work that was done on the Draft version will be maintained. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

@UnitedStatesian: The deleted page was an intertwined and blatant copyright violation of multiple sites and the current draft appears to be as well (see e.g., here). I don't have energy to try to sort it out right now, but I wanted to note the results of searches.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Understood, thanks. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

William Feather

Once popular author, sometimes associated with H.L. Mencken, has many quotations that appear with some frequency in quote collections —Underalms (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

@Underalms: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
@K.e.coffman: you prodded the article; you may want to go to AFD instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 11:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:AUTHOR with little doubt. I've just sent to AfD. Legacypac (talk) 17:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Fluidware

Page was not spam, no good reason for deletion was provided. —aminiland (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

  • Actually "G11 - Unambiguous advertising or promotion" in fact is as shown at WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Criteria for speedy deletion (our policies) and we would need explicit assurance advertising will not be restarted. If you can convince us there's genuine independence of information, uninfluenced by the company, that's different. SwisterTwister talk 03:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


  • It's tough to prove that since I cannot access the old page. This was a company which was involved in a notable acquisition in Ottawa, deleting the article seems like revising history.
It seems the deletion was due to an edit being made at some point by a banned sock puppet, but it's hard to tell what extent this article's contents were attributable to the bad actor, since the revision log is inaccessible. A temporary undeletion would allow me to demonstrate whether it was advertising or spam... —aminiland (talk)
@Aminiland: It was deleted by Ohnoitsjamie, apparently unilaterally, without being nominated for speedy deletion. This is OK if the article was blatantly or unambiguously promotional, but I don't see that as the case here. The correct action for you to take is to contact the deleting administrator and request restoration, preferably to draft space so the article can be improved and re-submitted for review. If the admin declines, you can take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review to get a community consensus whether the deletion was proper. ~Anachronist (talk) 11:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 Done Article has been restored per request. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Just so everyone is also aware, it was deleted by mass deleted along with other articles by unanimous community consensus. I'm not sure if it would need community consensus to then restore it but it is worth taking into consideration. The article still has G11 problems and so I'm moving it to the draft space at a minimum. Mkdw talk 18:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Gabe Kennedy

I, 2604:2000:8048:1500:C59B:4744:B134:1E03, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2604:2000:8048:1500:C59B:4744:B134:1E03 (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 21:01, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Draft:National Civic Art Society

I, Rundmt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rundmt (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

@Rundmt: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_270&oldid=1181510868"