Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 December 8

< December 7	December 9 >

December 8

Template:Wildlife of Norway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:41, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wildlife of Norway (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template was copied from the Template:Wildlife of India template, and the links still point to India-related topics. Simple editing could make this template useful, if only the named articles existed for Norway, but for the most part, they do not. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 02:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sorry but the template not is useless, is just constructed, one moment please :-) --Jackson Harrison (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom plus the fact that the creator just insisted on getting blocked as a sockpuppet. Favonian (talk) 18:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per favonian Kittybrewster ☎ 19:14, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WonderPets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WonderPets (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Remove the cast, which shouldn't even be in this template, and it navigates no more than three articles. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. When the cast is removed its useless. Mhiji (talk) 22:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 01:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zulapatrol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:44, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zulapatrol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Way too soon. Remove the cast, which shouldn't be there in the first place, and this template navigates absolutely nothing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. When the cast is removed its useless. Mhiji (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 01:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Current tennis tournaments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current tennis tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Current tennis tournaments/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is totally unused and nobody updates it. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 18:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unused, and unnecessary. Mhiji (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unnecessary. Reh man 02:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just unnecessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Add the documentation of the template. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 16:38, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008 ATP Race header

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2008 ATP Race header (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is redundant to {{ATP Race header}}. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:06, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 02:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2010 ATP World Tour Race to Barclays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2010 ATP World Tour Race to Barclays (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template is completely unused and wasn't updated since July 2010. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:04, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, goes well into a table instead. Reh man 02:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Time ago2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge, but delete redirect. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Time ago2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template created in May that is identical to {{time ago}}, with one exception: The template does not display "ago" at the end. Compare 2 years ago (time ago) with {{time ago2|20220322063413}} (time ago2). It isn't really necessary to have the removal of "ago" as a separate template. I'm proposing redirection of {{time ago2}} to {{time ago}} and the incorporation of {{time ago2}}'s function as a parameter of {{time ago}} cymru lass ^{(hit me up)}⁄_{(background check)} 01:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support feature merge - Yes, this is a vote, but the vote itself is all I really have to say, apart from the redirect.— Dæ dαlus^{+ Contribs} 02:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, but delete redirect. Since the template is fairly new, and considering its title, a redirect would be useless. Simply update the few links manually. Reh man 08:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per nom. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 23:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Largest cities of the United States

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge. JPG-GR (talk) 23:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Largest cities of the United States (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Largest Metropolitan Areas of the United States (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Largest cities of the United States with Template:Largest Metropolitan Areas of the United States.
I think we can capture all the data in one template. There is no need to have 2 different templates with such a similar scope and different data. Its confusing. Kumioko (talk) 06:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Although being metropolitan (more urban/economic) is not the same thing as been largest (by size/population). It is still confusing to have two templates that serve almost the same purpose. Farjad0322^{(talk|sign|contribs)} 22:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge, as said above, it's confusing to have two templates with nearly the same purpose. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:22, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, per above. Rehman 09:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as duplicative, can be consolidated. --Bsherr (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I repaired the TfM tags on the templates, which were broken or inadequate. Please relist this discussion to provide a fair opportunity for interested users to comment. --Bsherr (talk) 20:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge so long as the discrete information of metropolitan areas versus cities is preserved. While a single template will likely see more use (and is thus to be preferred), metropolitan area can be a more practical measure than legal city limit and the merged template should provide both datasets. Citizen Sunshine (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:42, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge – templates serve the same purpose. —mc10 (t/c) 21:45, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.