Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 July 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< July 17 July 19 >

July 18[edit]

Template:Merrimack Warriors football navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

All redlinks except one; created by a banned sock. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Andy Muschietti[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only three films and two of them are It. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep, now links four articles with two more announced according to IMDb. Frietjes (talk) 12:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then re-create the template when those projects are made. Hollywood is fickle and it's possible those would fall through. Don't put the cart before the horse. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • there is no cart being put before the horse. linking four article is sufficient for a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 21:59, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arizona Wildcats softball navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep At the time of nomination, there are 4 links (Arizona Wildcats softball, Rita Hillenbrand Memorial Stadium, List of Arizona Wildcats softball seasons, and 1991 Arizona Wildcats softball team) and I'm continuing to work on pages that will be connected. Billcasey905 (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Billcasey905, I'm not sure if you created the other team navboxes, or just copying what they do, but these templates are just designed bad. You're using color schemes that remove the ability to see what item is a label and what is an actual link. "People" and "Seasons" look exactly the same, yet one is a link, but it's barely noticeable; Using bold on years against what MOS:NOBOLD says or even italics for words that shouldn't be. Also, the sea of red links is really unhelpful. In my opinion the stadium does not count as a valid link for the count, as it is a "related" term and not something that is part of the topic. Re-create this when there are enough real links. --Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The design is standard for college sports and used for many of them. Disagree regarding the venue, as it is a stadium used specifically for this program and no others. Billcasey905 (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bad design is bad design, regardless if its the standard. Just notice how many guidelines it ignores: MOS:LINKSTYLE, MOS:CONTRAST, MOS:NOBOLD and this is with just a very brief look at these templates. Also, if I had any desire to see this through, I'd nominate Rita Hillenbrand Memorial Stadium at AfD as a look at google search results show only results from local newspappers about it. Seems very non notable. Also, I'd also advise you to slow down with the amount of pages you create, as List of Arizona Wildcats softball seasons has 0 references and 1991 Arizona Wildcats softball team has no non-primary sources and a giant empty MOS:DONTHIDE breaking table. If your aim is to try and game the system by creating almost-empty pages just so your templates can survive, I'll be more active in supporting deletion of other nominations. --Gonnym (talk) 14:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are currently six active links in this navbox (Arizona Wildcats softball, Rita Hillenbrand Memorial Stadium, List of Arizona Wildcats head softball coaches, List of Arizona Wildcats softball seasons, 1991 Arizona Wildcats softball team, and 1993 Arizona Wildcats softball team) which is more than enough to satisfy WP:NAVBOX. And, Billcasey is correct that this design is a standard format navbox for US college sports teams (see Template:Michigan Wolverines football navbox, Template:Alabama Crimson Tide football navbox, etc.). Ejgreen77 (talk) 02:02, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013–14 Ligue 1 table[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hong Kong Second Division League 2007-08[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Sawol (talk) 11:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:36, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Recitors of the Quran[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:50, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, same like having a template 'reciters of Bible'. Störm (talk) 10:10, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Naat Khawans[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:45, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have navbox for other religious singers, categories are better way for such cases. Störm (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Invincible (album)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) -- Trialpears (talk) 17:16, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Between the Invincible (Michael Jackson album) article itself and the Template:Michael Jackson songs, navigation to and from the songs on this album is already straightforward. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, navbox overkill, we already have sufficient navigation between the articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This album navigational template is already better covered by Template:Michael Jackson songs and is currently only including in the album's article that already has links to each of the songs. Aspects (talk) 19:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Elephantsquash[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:06, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This unusual template has only been used twice and is unlikely to be used in the future. It is somewhat amusing but its lack of use means that its absence would not be greatly missed. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_July_18&oldid=907996467"