Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 27 March 1 >

February 28[edit]

Template:Lynching in India[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 7. ✗plicit 13:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CatholicCOTW[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since 2015. Subst talk page usages of {{CatholicCOTW}} and delete all. Gonnym (talk) 06:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CCWDprev[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration from at least 2008. Remove usages and delete. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CHICOTW[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since at 2009. Remove usages and delete. Gonnym (talk) 06:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transcludes example[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:15, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary template. Gonnym (talk) 06:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. Supreme Court composition 1789–1792[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above templates are all unused after Gallery of United States Supreme Court composition templates was deleted and editors at the AfD did not want to merge its content (including these) into List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition. Gonnym (talk) 07:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Title disambig text/logic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused since the parent template was converted to Lua in 2013. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Translation/Talkpage[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused talk page message that I couldn't find if it was even used and it doesn't seem to be set for subst. It's also has nothing to do with Template:Translation. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The edit-summary field/old[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 7. ✗plicit 11:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Community of Madrid medical cases chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy. ✗plicit 13:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Covid chart for part of Spain. This sort of detail is very unlikely to be required. Nigej (talk) 08:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both Also abandoned over a year ago; even less useful when out of date. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userfy Move to the userspace of the last editor who updated data or to my userspace if no one else claims it. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/South Africa, Western Cape medical cases[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Covid data by district in Western Cape, South Africa. Not maintained and such detailed data is unlikely to be usable. Nigej (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Canada/Manitoba medical cases chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was userfy per request. Primefac (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Covid data for sub-divisions of Canada. Not maintained and unlikely to be usable. Nigej (talk) 09:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Userfy Move the other 4 charts to the userspace of the last editors who updated data or to my userspace if no one else claims it. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Czech aircraft[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 9. Izno (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Main Page alternative (Italian-style)/Sviluppo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on only one page. Should be subst there and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cinema COTW[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since 2007 (with a random post in 2016). See also previous related TfDs this and this. Gonnym (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Climb Collaboration Current[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since 2013. See also related TfD. Gonnym (talk) 11:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COL Collaboration Notice[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since 2014. Subst talk page usages of {{COL Invitation}} and delete both. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dictator Novel Grading[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relate to the defunct Wikipedia:WikiProject Murder Madness and Mayhem. One transclusion each there. Suggest Subst/delete. Nigej (talk) 12:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Heh, not "defunct," simply finished. :) But if the subst leaves the page looking as it does, then this is fine by me. (I'm far from a template expert.) --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EFL Championship teamlist[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:23, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox relating to the EFL Championship (soccer). Now covered by {{EFL Championship}}. Nigej (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ANZC team nav[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused team navbox. Gonnym (talk) 12:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ad monitoring[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table created by a user whose only edit was this. Gonnym (talk) 12:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eliteserien seasons[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox now covered by {{Eliteserien}} (Norwegian soccer). Nigej (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afd footer (multiple)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to nominate multiple related pages for deletion does not use this template. Gonnym (talk) 12:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baltic Pipeline System-II/nav[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template with external links. Parent template was deleted here but I have no idea if they were really related or not. Gonnym (talk) 12:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:English Northern Premier League teams[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table relating to the 2006-07 Season of the Northern Premier League (soccer). No obvious use since its primarily a list of the final league positions. Nigej (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Base category[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Draftied by creator. (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:17, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category template which if used, would link to a red link category. Might be still be unfinished so if creator wants it, it should be moved to their userspace otherwise, deleted. Gonnym (talk) 12:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Spartak Trnava Squad[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{FC Spartak Trnava squad}} (small s). Nigej (talk) 12:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Basketballbox collapsible/result[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-template of Template:Basketballbox collapsible which was removed here after being in use for 4 minutes. Gonnym (talk) 12:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Common image aspect ratios[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A table that is only used at Aspect ratio (image). Should be subst and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By subst, do you mean copying the template code in the article? Because I created this template to remove that code from the article. The RedBurn (ϕ) 13:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that is what substing means. We don't generally create templates solely to remove code from one article, so subst and delete. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, then keep. By the way, one use only isn't one of the WP:TFD#REASONS. What's the purpose of filling articles with code? The RedBurn (ϕ) 21:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:TG: "Templates that ... are ... used on only one page ... may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion." Also WP:TFD#REASONS says "Templates for which none of these apply may be deleted by consensus here." Nigej (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Floorball Championships[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox. Only covers up to 2008. Has been replaced by {{World Floorball Championships}}, {{EuroFloorball Cup}}. Nigej (talk) 12:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Continent/Complex[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 10. Izno (talk) 23:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Convert to use WPBannerMeta[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Seems any conversion needed was completed. Category:Templates to be standardized/WPBannerMeta should be deleted with it. Gonnym (talk) 12:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Council Front LegCo members[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:59, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox for a topic which has no article Council Front. Gonnym (talk) 12:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current hour offset in time zone/old[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused copy of code which is already located in the edit history of Template:Current hour offset in time zone. Gonnym (talk) 12:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DART FS[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:01, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates marked as deprecated. Gonnym (talk) 12:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FD rc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused invite for an event that happened in 2016 so won't be used either. Gonnym (talk) 12:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FOLDOC/text[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-template of Template:FOLDOC. Gonnym (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Female sign[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused male and female character templates. If someone really needs to use these, they can just use the symbols. No need for the templates. Gonnym (talk) 12:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Harbin districts[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Harbin#Administrative divisions uses a different map. Gonnym (talk) 12:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Parc de loisirs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Bbb23 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused but more importantly, created in the incorrect namespace. Gonnym (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox neuron/Copyandpaste[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlinked from parent template and also very unnecessary and prone to being outdated. Any "copy and paste" usage should be in the Template:Infobox neuron#Usage or Template:Infobox neuron#Example sections. Gonnym (talk) 12:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Attilio Fontana sidebar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar with several links leading to the same article. Realistically Attilio Fontana is the only article where this is usable so it's not "part of a series about" him. Nigej (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hidden image[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTCENSORED * Pppery * it has begun... 14:45, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete WP:NOTCENSORED is 100% clear. Nigej (talk) 14:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It is not possible to use this template in a way that complies with policy. Thryduulf (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment a previous template of this name was speedily deleted in 2017 under the (now-repealed) criterion WP:CSD#T3, but reading the deleted talk page it seems that it was (intended as?) some sort of wrapper for Template:Hidden rather than directly for violating WP:NOTCENSORED (although one of the desired uses was contrary to that policy). Thryduulf (talk) 18:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]
  • Delete per nom, blatant WP:NOTCENSORED violation. — csc-1 17:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 21:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the many many many previous discussions we have had about hiding images over the years, all of which have closed with consensus against implementation. A policy change of this magnitude would require a centrally advertised RfC and has about a 0% chance of passing in my estimation. The duplicate of this in draft space Draft:Template:Hidden image should also be deleted as clean-up. 192.76.8.77 (talk) 21:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom; clearly not something that we should be doing. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lambdawave[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plain text, only used in the creator's own sandbox. We don't have an article on Lambdawave so nowhere for this text to go. Nigej (talk) 16:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:La Puerta Del Sol Chihuahua[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Short piece of plain text used in the creator's own space. No obvious use. Nigej (talk) 16:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PaginaPrincipale/Guida[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A template only used on one page and consists of "Don't Panic" in stylized text. Should either be subst there and deleted, or just removed as pointless text. Gonnym (talk) 16:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LNBS Hurricane S-S Hurricane Scale Color Chart[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

From 2006. Table related to colors to be used for the Saffir–Simpson scale. Difficult to imagine a use for it. Used on one talk page. Nigej (talk) 16:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LDS Leader[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused box relating to leaders of the Latter Day Saint movement. Nigej (talk) 16:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arifiye-Adapazari[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route map for the Arifiye–Adapazarı railway (I assume, although confusingly it mentions the Pehlivanköy–Svilengrad railway). Nigej (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Auckland Metro train network[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route-map. Covered at List of Auckland railway stations which has a map with the stations marked. Nigej (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Politics of Newfoundland and Labrador[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Newfoundland and Labrador politics as a reasonable alternate name. Primefac (talk) 15:10, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar. Was the subject of a TfD in 2011 when it was a navbox, but has since turned into a sidebar. The navbox {{Newfoundland and Labrador politics}} covers the topic. Nigej (talk) 19:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Poradaha–Bhanga railway[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route-map of the Poradaha–Bhanga railway but no actual content to link to. Nigej (talk) 19:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Population per MP per district (Turkey)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chart of the average population per MP in each of the Provinces of Turkey but it's unreferenced and not usable. Nigej (talk) 19:32, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Still support deletion after the striking of part of the nomination. The template is unused, and we shouldn't give abandoned content like this a second shot at life because it happened to be in a template. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Porto Metro[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Route-map of the Porto Metro, which doesn't use it. {{PM-network}} is used and there's clearly no requirement for both. Nigej (talk) 19:36, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prehistoric Southwest Asia timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 22:11, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline for prehistoric Southwest Asia. Nigej (talk) 19:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I've added it to several relevant articles. Also, I created this just last summer; why not ask whether it's still being worked on rather than going straight to TfD? – Joe (talk) 06:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    If you create a template you need to use it within 10 minutes, not 10 months. Development should be done in your own sandbox area. Nigej (talk) 07:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Please point me to the policy you've taken that rule from. Because WP:TFD#REASONS gives (emphasis original): The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used. – Joe (talk) 08:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    WP:TG says "Templates that violate the guidelines on this page, have poorly defined function, are redundant, become orphaned or used on only one page, or violate any Wikipedia policies may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion." See also the section there "Sandbox for experiments": "If you wish to experiment with templates (and not have your experiments deleted before you are done with them), you may do so in the Template sandbox.". Also worth noting that there's no "ownership" in Template space. Nigej (talk) 10:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    In other words, you pulled "templates must be transcluded within 10 minutes" out of your arse? None of those statements apply to this template, nor did you advance an argument that they did. Please try to come up with an actual reason before you nominate other peoples' work for deletion—from any namespace—in future. No ownership means you don't own the namespace either. – Joe (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please assume good faith. The template was created last year and should have been used from that point on. And Nigej saw the template was in fact unused when he nominated it and his nomination of the template being unused at first is a reason to nominate for deletion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's not "other people's work". You seem to think you own this template. Anyway it seems pretty odd to me that you create a template, don't use it, do nothing with it for 10 months and then complain when someone wonders what's going on: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion. Nigej (talk) 18:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn. Now used in a number of articles. Nigej (talk) 08:00, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-2redirect/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This /doc subpage is not needed, because the parent template uses the standard {{Single notice}} shared by similar pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:34, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Harmless, and allows categories to be placed on this page rather than the template itself. Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This doc isn't used as the template uses the {{Single notice}} doc. Gonnym (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-plotsum1/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This /doc subpage is not needed, because the parent template uses the standard {{Templates notice}} shared by similar pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Harmless, and allows categories to be placed on this page rather than the template itself. Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. These docs aren't used as the templates themselves use {{Templates notice}} doc. Gonnym (talk) 15:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Warrnambool line/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This /doc subpage is not needed, because the parent template uses the shared {{Railway-routemap}} to display its documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Harmless, and allows categories to be placed on this page rather than the template itself. Steel1943 (talk) 19:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or use (and then remove the category and docs from the template) but do not keep and keep orphaned. Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check/doc[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by MSGJ (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The parent page is a redirect, and the redirect target uses automatic documentation generated by the template, so there is no possible use for this page or its content. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Middle Ages Europe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and duplicates Template:Middle Ages. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. this template is totally different from template:Middle Ages, as it uses a creative and useful alternate approach; namely, by grouping articles by separate topics, rather than simply by chronological phases without any topical groupings. --Sm8900 (talk) 02:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We don't need two templates for the same exact subject. Add the missing links to the standard ones if they are missing and wanted. Gonnym (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Having two navboxes on the same topic is likely to confuse readers, not help them navigate. I can't see we'd want both in any article and if the intension is put one on some pages and the other on some, then that's just going to confuse readers too. Nigej (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ranks and Insignia of Non NATO Navies/OF/Kingdon of Hawai'i[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently used on a draft article by the creator of this template. Probably has potential in the future, but maybe userfication is the best way at the moment. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nothing interesting[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G7 -- TNT (talk • she/her) 23:39, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing interesting. Not even used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:33, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_28&oldid=1076405651"