Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 May 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 5 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 7 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 6[edit]

2018-19 NCAA Football Bowl Games Article[edit]

Draft:2018-19 NCAA football bowl games

Can you Help with the 2018-19 NCAA Football Bowl Games Article Please. Because I Put one single source and it was broken can you fix the source please. 158.85.159.179 (talk) 02:26, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:33:14, 6 May 2018 review of submission by b.gauthier.quebec[edit]

I created Draft:Voluntary_Organization_for_Professional_Evaluation editor Heliosxeros has turned it down a few times. The criticism appears to refer to notability. I have made several changes, including clear references to a number of published sources but to no avail. The most recent advice by Heliosxeros is to add newspaper coverage but this is not relevant to the topic at hand. Could you please either help me understand what is missing or help Heliosxeros see the light? Thanks in advance. B.gauthier.quebec (talk) 09:33, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@B.gauthier.quebec: I've left a comment on the draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

09:56:12, 6 May 2018 review of submission by Spaceabon[edit]

I don't find any more sources, my requirements are third-party sources can anyone help. Spaceabon () 05:56, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spaceabon - Hooray, architecture! I'll go and see if I can help. KJP1 (talk) 11:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KJP1 I've never seen someone who is excited and happy at the same time when helping to draft article, Wew, Thank you so much Spaceabon () 07:24, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Spaceabon - I'm sorry, but I just don't think it is Notable. I can't find anything beyond mentions in tourism sites or blogs. To be Notable, and have an article on here, the tower needs "significant coverage from reliable, independent sources" and I just don't think it's had that. Sometimes it's hard, I've done lots of articles on pretty unimportant buildings but unless you can find a couple of good sources, you really can't make it Notable. Perhaps you could add a bit to the city page? KJP1 (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KJP1 i will try to find it and ask my fellow filipino who is active on editing articles on that country thx for the edits. :) Spaceabon () 07:40, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Spaceabon - No problem and best of luck with your editing. KJP1 (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

Recently, an editor requested that my articles mentioned above in the subject line be speedily deleted. I have rewritten them extensively in my own words and made them much shorter. Could you please revisit them and accept? I'm sorry for the original mistake - I am new to Wikipedia and still learning. Another editor said that they are not notable - the film producers are in fact Africa's leading film producers having produced major Hollywood studio films like "Mad Max: Fury Road", "The Avengers: Age of Ultron", "Judge Dredd", a quick visit to their website (http: www.moonlighting.co.za/) will demonstrate an incredibly long list of very notable productions which they have produced (there are producers who are much less notable from other places that have Wikipedia entries). Thank you very much.

Thank you very much. Mockby 123 (talk) 10:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You posted about these in the Teahouse too where your questions were answered. Someone will review the drafts soon. Legacypac (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:27:38, 6 May 2018 review of submission by Michaela.Chalasova1979[edit]


Michaela.Chalasova1979 (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

20:27:38, 6 May 2018 review of submission by Michaela.Chalasova1979



Hi,I would like to add company and their website but i am not sure weather i am doing it right,it says it might take up to 2 months to be accepted is that right? or shall i add it in different window?sorry i am doing it for the first time . I appreciate your help. Michaela

Most pages are reviewed within a couple days. A few get out to two months Legacypac (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:46:41, 6 May 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by LordHorst[edit]


I am trying to create an article for actress Rebecca Windheim. Unfortunately there aren't many sources available. There is an IMDB page, but I am told, it is not a source. There are interwiki links for that name, but interwiki links aren't a source either. I have seen her in a movie yesterday, but that would be original research and wouldn't count as a source either. I think I found her instagram page, but I doubt this would count as a source either. So, my question is what can I do now to get the article published? What do I need to site as a source to "proof" this person exists and really is an actress? Would rottentomatoes count as a source? Letterboxd.com? I really need help here. :) LordHorst (talk) 21:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC) LordHorst (talk) 21:46, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Needs to pass WP:ACTOR. I'll take a look. Legacypac (talk) 22:25, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

22:00:48, 6 May 2018 review of submission by D2quadra[edit]


I would like to add an image to the article.

As it has to comply the copyright rules I made a simular image myself to the one I found in the paper here

But I am not sure if that is fine to do? Can you clarify at which point I just copied and at which point it is my own work?

thanks and cheers

D2quadra (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi D2quadra. A comprehensive answer to your question requires specialist expertise in an area (copyright) other than that on which this help desk focuses (the articles for creation process). Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Help desk, a more widely-watched venue where editors will try to answer any question regarding how to use Wikipedia. Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. Another resource you could try is Wikipedia:Graphics Lab, where volunteers create diagrams upon request. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:16:13, 6 May 2018 review of draft by MariaSynenka[edit]


Hello! First of all, this is a translation from the Ukrainian article -https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96%D0%B2 .

Second, please help with formatting. Why this -

doesn't work?

Third, should I submit this article for review if I may still want to edit it? Finally, I cannot add more sources as this is a translation (a bit shortened). Is that ok?

Any recommendations are welcome. Thanks! MariaSynenka (talk) 23:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MariaSynenka: the reason the "main" templates aren't working is you put the "nowiki" codes around them. "Nowiki" tells the browser to just show the code as written, not actually apply the code, so just remove those tags from around whatever text to get the code to function.
Next, I think you're good to click Submit Draft; if it gets turned down, you'll be given clear feedback about what needs to be improved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I approved the page. Legacypac (talk) 15:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]