Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/feedback/Archive 18

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from Dorothy Potter Snyder (5 January 2020)[edit]

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Having difficulty knowing how to improve the article. The sample article for a "Start" quality article is much shorter and has fewer references than the article I wrote. I don't see any grammar mistakes in my article. Therefore, it would be helpful for me to know specifically what demerits this article has to earn it such a low grade; then I could work with greater clarity towards improving it.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Took four+ months.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • My only suggestion is that for those of us who are new at contributing to Wikipedia, it would serve us better for editors and fellow contributors to make sure they're not making comments or suggestions in "shorthand". Lack of clarity in critiques can be frustrating to newbies. Spell it out.

Dorothy Potter Snyder (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dorothy Potter Snyder:, I added a note at the top of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme, which hopefully should make some things clearer, at least as far as what 'Start' means or what to aim for 'higher' ratings and where to get feedback. Also don't see 'Start' as a 'demerit', these classes are a way to track what remains to be done before it meets the criteria for the 'next' level. Most of the articles I created were Stub/Start/C classes myself. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from JNStove (7 February 2020)[edit]

Did you find the instructions clear?

Not really - I wasn't sure why my article only received 'Start' status (no specifics were mentioned)*

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Promptly*

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

I would like some specific suggestions for improving my article please.* — Preceding unsigned comment added by JNStove (talk • contribs) 10:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JNStove:, I added a note at the top of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Grading scheme, which hopefully should make some things clearer, at least as far as what 'Start' means or what to aim for 'higher' ratings and where to get feedback. Also don't see 'Start' as a 'demerit', these classes are a way to track what remains to be done before it meets the criteria for the 'next' level. Most of the articles I created were Stub/Start/C classes myself. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Theo8436 (9 March 2020)[edit]

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • . I'm sure they are clear put I get lost in here easily.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly! I was so excited that I reached a live person!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • do you have any one-on-one instructions? I'm very confused. Wrong generation for some of the written instructions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo8436 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from GreatStellatedDodecahedron (26 March 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • The instructions were clear but pretty complicated
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 90 minutes
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Samsmachado (1 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

Him (Cummings play)

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes!
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 2.5 months
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • In the 2.5 months it took for my article to be reviewed, I became confident enough to publish it myself. However I was unsure of how to remove it from AFC. Maybe make it clear how to do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsmachado (talk • contribs) 00:47, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from SaladH (1 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, the page detailing the process of writing a first article was well written.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 24 hours! Sooner than I expected :P
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Not much to say! I actually didn't expect the process to be so neat :O so I'd like thank to the other users reviewing and tidying the article up :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaladH (talk • contribs) 16:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Darmozrac (7 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

Melicytus alpinus

Did you find the instructions clear?

sort of , it was a bit overwhelming but clear enough

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

speed of light

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

not at the moment — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darmozrac (talk • contribs) 10:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Gladiator-Citizen (13 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • I think I needed a bit more specific guidance when the entry was first rejected.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly - which was appreciated
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes, as I say above, I needed more specifics like " read about how references must be right after the statements which need proof; and also read about what to do when references are repeated several times through the article." I would not have been so discouraged. Having said that I think I have made leap forward in learning what is important.

I can see some small improvements I can still make and I think the alterations other editors made after submission really improved it. So thanks MurielMary and all concerned. Gladiator-Citizen (talk) 04:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Funny bandana (21 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

Mega Cabs

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Within 2-3 days. I was really surprised by how quickly it was reviewed but it was also a stub article.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

No, I think it's pretty good the way it is right now.

Feedback from ThePhantom65 (24 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, very clear
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • A few hours
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Bdm166 (26 April 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from FloyFavorite (1 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Draft:Elizabeth Doten
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, only a little arcane ...
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Um, not very quickly -- 2 months. but I was warned.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • No -- I am honored for my article to be accepted. I really like to be part of the Wikipedia process.

FloyFavorite (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from ElsaObuchowski (10 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, for the most part.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within an hour or two.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from ElenaEt (11 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • some of them
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Thanks to all the people who help answering my questions

@nickmoreau thanksElenaEt (talk) 23:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Earthianyogi (14 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, instructions are exhaustive. A shorter version could add value to the process, like a short summary of instructions, maybe it already exists.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a week, I think.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • New articles could be automatically checked for basic items, such as the number of words in the new submission, number of references, if the article title already exists as a subheading within another article, etc.

Earthianyogi (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Pairko (15 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Plesiotherapy
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Licks-rocks (16 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connemara_marble

Did you find the instructions clear?

yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

within two days

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

no — Preceding unsigned comment added by Licks-rocks (talk • contribs) 11:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Bmantha (27 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

Biodiversity Park, Visakhapatnam

Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • in a very short time highly remarkable time - few days soon after my submission
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

really the process is nice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmantha (talk • contribs) 01:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Turini2 (27 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes, very!
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In just a few hours!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Rnagfn (29 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Costliest cities in the world
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within 16 days
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Right now I am a new user. I am learning Wikipedia. I hope I will definitely leave my suggestion in the near future. Thanks & Regards RoySmith! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rnagfn (talk • contribs) 10:32, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Uffda608 (31 May 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Less than a day
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Dmbrinton (1 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Robert K. Brinton (mountaineer)
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Within a week of its submission
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The process was amazingly smooth and we were assisted in it by several very helpful editors. This was our first Wikipedia submission (I worked together with my sister on it). We were quite worried about the potential conflict of interest issue since the page had to do with my fathers ski mountaineering and rock climbing career but again we received help on this issue and are very thankful that the article was accepted for inclusion in Wikipedia. We'll continue to edit the article as we hope to add a few photos but consider that the main work on it has now been completed.

Dmbrinton (talk) 04:41, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dmbrinton, in the future can you officially disclose your COI per the instructions at WP:DISCLOSECOI? This would be helpful when assessing articles written by you. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:49, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Okah Ewah Edede (3 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes I did.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Two days. That was pretty fast. Thanks to Zanimum.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Not really, I just have two articles I would want the admins to look at, and if they meet Wikipedia's standard, have them indexed for search engines find?
  • Here are the links below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maheshwara_Medical_College_and_Hospital

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._G._S._Mahesh

Okah Ewah Edede (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from JoJo Anthrax (4 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • John Lester Johnson
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • 2-3 hr
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • The new article has "taken with it" the Talk page of my Sandbox, which contains all sorts of messages and comments that predate the article, and indeed have nothing to do with it. I might have missed it, but it might help if the instructions include a suggestion along the lines of "Editors should clear their sandbox Talk page prior to submission - here is how to do that..." Not surprisingly, I do not know how to remove it or otherwise re-set the new article's Talk page.

Feedback from Earthianyogi (5 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Angelika Bischof-Delaloye
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • When an article is declined, the author should be encouraged to discuss it with the reviewer directly. Thx

Feedback from Totihan30 (9 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Antonio Mercadante
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No, not at all, but I can easily conclude that was because of my personal intellectual limitations
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Slowly, in my sense. The entire process took two years.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes,the language of the instruction could be simplified, as well as the format in which the instructions appear — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totihan30 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Jonscottcorp (17 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • NO
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • N/A
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I followed all instructions and created article with same standards as other wiki pages. I was told it wont be approved because I have to add more info and details. I kept adding more info as I was told and now they say it will probably be deleted because its like an advertisement. Other wiki pages regarding non profit and voting are published, live , with no issues. This article started as the same format as other ones which does not make sense why I needed to add more information and details. Now that I did, they say it will be deleted. JonscottcorpJonscottcorp (talk) 01:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Dtrinikodi (25 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • charitha pattiaratchi
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very Quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from WakingLili (25 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Not really. I created the page in my sandbox first, then used the "Submit for Review" button -- that form is the page I found confusing. First, I wasn't sure what to put for "Subject/heading," because it wasn't clear how it would be used. Is that the name of my article, an edit summary, a message that will accompany the submission, or something else? I ultimately used the title of my article... which meant that when the "Your article has been submitted for review" template was added to the bottom of the page draft, its section heading was also the title of the article, which didn't inspire confidence that I had done the right thing. Second, that heading and template were inserted into the page draft between the "References" heading and the actual list of references. Third, the fact that the form had a giant text edit box which contained a message not to edit it was also confusing. The fact that things worked out this time gives me a lot more confidence for my next submission, but it was my first article and I waited before completing the Submit for Review form because I didn't want to do things wrong. (I know, I know... I should just be bold, but I wanted to do it right.)
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Nearly instantaneously -- thank you to reviewer Timtrent!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • On the "Submit for Review" form, put clearer instructions about what to do with the "Subject/heading" field. It would help to explain briefly where the field will be used.
  • Get rid of the giant text box that says "don't edit this text box," if possible.
  • If feasible, fix the transclusion of the "Your article is under review" template so that it appears either before the "References" heading or after the end of the references list.

WakingLili (talk) 23:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Atomortis (29 June 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • the submission was about an Artist
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Absolutely clear. In the beginning, it was challenging to understand the quality of a source, as a website did not fall under a legitimate information source.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In less than a month and sometimes less than 2 weeks.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I think having those forums of discussion was also an additional supportive process in order to correct mistakes.

Nonetheless, the experience was wonderful and fruitful.

Feedback[edit]

It feels so great to see my article got accept and included in 'class'=C and among the 18th accepted page. Much regards (F5pillar---/ Hey wassup🖋📩) 07:54, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Atifkumar123456 (21 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Profile creation
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • In a Day. That was very fast
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Earthianyogi (24 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Kawal Rhode
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quite quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Sort the WP:PROF Criteria-1 sorted by having a quantitative threshold for the number of citations needed to qualify.

Feedback from Earthianyogi (24 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Vicky Goh
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quite quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Sort the WP:PROF Criteria-1 sorted by having a quantitative threshold for the number of citations needed to qualify.

Feedback from Earthianyogi (24 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Sanjukta Deb
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • No
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Fairly quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Sort the WP:PROF criteria-1 with a quantitative threshold.

Feedback from DeltaSquad833 (26 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • SS De Klerk
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • faster than expected
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from VidhyadhariK (28 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Articles for creation: Chaithra Rai
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes I found the clear instructions, and I got a very helpful suggestion on the helpdesk also.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It took 45day for review and acceptance, But I am happy as this is my first article submitted
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Really no, talks and helpdesk really give us a lot of suggestions and clear instructions to create the articles in simple way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VidhyadhariK (talk • contribs) 05:58, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from DeltaSnowQueen (28 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yep
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Like lightening! I was expecting eight weeks but it was less than an hour.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • No, it was seamless. Thanks also to the reviewer for tidying up the absolute horror show I had going on in the footnotes! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeltaSnowQueen (talk • contribs) 18:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Cisternet (30 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes! Very clear.

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Very quickly - within a week.

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

The first time my article didn't get accepted, and it would have been helpful to know which citations didn't meet the quality standard so I could correct more efficiently. However, after I posted a request for this information, another editor helped, and after I did a thorough edit, my article was accepted! It just might have been more expedient to receive that info upfront. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cisternet (talk • contribs) 14:55, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Nithiin1983 (31 July 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

Neha Narang

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

No

Feedback from DaSupremo (4 August 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Nana Oti Akenten
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Quite quick
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • None

Feedback from Nihaal The Wikipedian (13 August 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • It was very quickly reviewed . It took less than a day.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I request fixing any future bugs because it is a stub class and I want to improve it .

Nihaal The Wikipedian (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Muhammad236 (24 August 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed? it takes time but ok at least reviewed.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Yes please give time to improve the article not to delete so quickly without any notice.

Feedback from Ackee123 (4 September 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • There is so much data in Wikpedia on how to do things I do find it challenging. I have been trying to submit other pages for artists but I realize now I was trying to do too much. Specially as family life has been hectic .. but I found a 5 minute tutorial on Youtube that explained what I needed to do simply and in a friendly manner.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • My submission was reviewed surprisingly quickly as I imagine you are inundated with requests. I am grateful for that. Especially as I want to get more diverse artists represented in Wikipedia.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • It would be great to have a visual 1 - 2 - 3 kind of one sheet showing how to set up a Wikipedia article simply. It would link back to Wikipedia pages for more detail. I am going to try to make one for Wikipedia and for Wikimedia as I am writing a series called The Super Simple Guide.. the idea is to break things down into simple blocks that are visually easy to receive information in a stress-less manner

Thanks also to the Wiki editors who have been trying to help me along the ways

Ackee123 (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Rahulsoman (9 September 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • The submission getting reviewed Quickly.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • getting positive criticisms helps to improve the articles.
  • How to join in a group and work towards one project in wiki. (I am relatively new user just to know about it. I asked.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulsoman (talk • contribs) 14:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Loafiewa (13 September 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?

On the Heights of Despair

Did you find the instructions clear?

Yes

How quickly was your submission reviewed?

Less than 24 hours

Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

I was told that I could make an article without using AfC since I've made 10 edits over the last 4 days, but I didn't see any option to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loafiewa (talk • contribs) 15:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Gleeanon409 (29 September 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • n/a
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • very
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • I almost exclusively edit using the Visual Editor on my wee old iPhone, with a practical window about 2”*2”; the AfC banners across the top of the article are oppressive, and a barrier to editing. With regular articles AfD and clean-up tags are auto-shrunk and I click to expand and read them.
    I think you may have a sizable percentage of editors who give up rather than edit with those large billboard rejections atop their work. Gleeanon409 (talk) 23:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Insaaniyat (2 October 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Working with Wikipedia is fantastic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insaaniyat (talk • contribs) 05:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Violeta Čapovska (7 October 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Draft:Ivan Čapovski
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes, very clear, professional and kind
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly, within 24 hours
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from 2A01:6500:A105:2514:16F9:E9A0:B008:5D13 (5 November 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Hello there, I fail to understand how can I erase the number 1 from my article.

Can you help me with that?

How quickly was your submission reviewed?
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?

Feedback from Vladd2000 (23 November 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
  • Pavel Trusov
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • They were OK at best.
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Almost 4 months.
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
  • Review quicker? Let userws who created articles before, create new articles without having to wait 4 months for a review? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladd2000 (talk • contribs) 04:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Dom672 (27 December 2020)[edit]

What was your submission?
Did you find the instructions clear?
  • Yes they were clear, however the editor was very helpful in showing me a good example
How quickly was your submission reviewed?
  • Very quickly, within the space of 12 hours it had been reviewed twice!
Do you have any suggestions to improve the process?
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/feedback/Archive_18&oldid=1166976179"