Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Brunswick/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

New Brunswick discussion from Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals

Description
This WikiProject, as a subproject of Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada, would help to bring together all pages realting to the province of New Brunswick. There are a lot of pages that need cleaning up or updating.
Temporary Project Page
User:Yvesnimmo/WikiProject New Brunswick Wikipedia:WikiProject New Brunswick
Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)
  1. Yvesnimmo 14:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. John Carter 14:31, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Comments

This WikiProject is up and running.

Proposed standardization of importance rankings

Hello, WikiProject New Brunswick. The other Canada-related wikiprojects have been merging their talk-page templates so that articles can be added to WikiProject Canada and to other Canada-related projects at once. This should help all of the Canadian wikiprojects spread awareness about each other and co-ordinate improvements and assessments. We would like this objective to include WikiProject New Brunswick. Under this system, an article about a New Brunswick musician (for example) would look like this:

WikiProject iconCanada: New Brunswick Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.

This template uses the same assessment criteria for all listed projects; so if WikiProject New Brunswick were to integrate with the other Canada-related projects, you would have to change your importance-ratings scale to standardize with that of WikiProject Canada. This would mean that your only top-importance article would be New Brunswick and your only high-importance articles would be major topics like Moncton and History of New Brunswick. Would you, the regulars in this project, be open to thus changing your importance ratings? --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Available auto location map

Nackawic is located in New Brunswick
Nackawic
Nackawic
class=notpageimage|
Location of Nackawic in New Brunswick

{{Location map New Brunswick}} will add a map of New Brunswick with a dot placed automatically using geo coordinates.

It can also be used with {{Infobox Settlement|pushpin_map=New Brunswick}}, such as in Saint-Quentin, New Brunswick. 

{{Location map
|New Brunswick
|lat=46.00529
|long=-67.23594
|caption=Location of Nackawic in [[New Brunswick]]
|width=220
|label=Nackawic
}}

The preceding code will produce the map at right.--Qyd (talk) 00:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Dutch Occupation of Acadia

A requested move has been initiated to move Dutch Occupation of Acadia to Nova Hollandia, per name given to territory occupied by the Dutch. 70.55.87.54 (talk) 03:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

List of waterfalls of Canada

Please help to fulfill the dynamics of this list, List of waterfalls of Canada, and fill in any red link missing waterfall articles and their respective images. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 01:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

File:Maritimes.png

Image:Maritimes.png has been nominated for deletion. 76.66.196.218 (talk) 05:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Francophonie?

Does anyone think there should be a WP:WikiProject Francophonie? It would be like WP:WikiProject Commonwealth that handles the British Commonwealth.

See Talk:Organisation_internationale_de_la_Francophonie_(OlF)#WikiProject_Francophonie? for the discussion.

76.66.197.30 (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:41, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Portal:New Brunswick

{{Portal|New Brunswick}} Merry xmass!!...........Please add it to your watch list..will add more content soon!!! Moxy (talk) 23:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

New Brunswick articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the New Brunswick articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:23, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Two Solitudes (Canadian society)

FYI, Two Solitudes (Canadian society) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been nominated for deletion. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 05:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maritimer English

The article Maritimer English has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references found no published (gBooks) support for this article, fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Maritimer English for deletion

The article Maritimer English is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maritimer English until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jeepday (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

pronunciation needed

Hi,

Can anyone confirm that Apohaqui, New Brunswick is pronounced AP-ə-hawk ? (that would mean that the last vowel would be that of haw rather than hah! for those who make that distinction.) It's been tagged for a long time, and I've done my best with the respellings I've found online, but I can't be sure.

Thanks, — kwami (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

The first pronunciation is the correct one; pronouncing it ap-a-hock-kwee is purely humourous. It looks like somebody was playing games with the English author, or it could be their typical scholarly butchery of anything even looking foreign. The hahk could be mistaken for hack by someone unfamiliar with it, so I changed that.
I lived next door to the place for years. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Area of Nigadoo–Chaleur

Any ideas on where I might find the area of the Nigadoo–Chaleur provincial electoral district? The fed districts are easy, but the provincial ones seem to have a higher degree of difficulty to find information at times... - Wmcduff (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Found it through an e-mail to Elections NB, however, not citable. If anyone finds a citable source, it would be much appreciated. - Wmcduff (talk) 15:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiWomen's History Month

Hi everyone. March is Women's History Month and I'm hoping a few folks here at WP:New Brunswick will have interest in putting on events (on and off wiki) related to women's roles in New Brunswick's history, society and culture. We've created an event page on English Wikipedia (please translate!) and I hope you'll find the inspiration to participate. These events can take place off wiki, like edit-a-thons, or on wiki, such as themes and translations. Please visit the page here: WikiWomen's History Month. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to seeing events take place! SarahStierch (talk) 23:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Request for cleanup assistance at List of city nicknames in Canada#New Brunswick

This section of this list article needs cleanup. In particular, references based on reliable sources (not user-generated media such as blogs, forums, tweets, etc.) for the numerous of nicknames are required, as well as weeding out editor-derived/questionable nicknames from the genuine nicknames of widespread usage. I've cleaned up the Alberta section, and am looking to the members of the applicable provincial/territorial WikiProjects to help out with the other sections including this one. Thanks, Hwy43 (talk) 06:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done – expansion of the list with additional nicknames with references based on reliable sources welcome of course! Hwy43 (talk) 07:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposal to redirect Canadian related project talk pages

Please see Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect Canadian related project talk pages.Moxy (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Requested move List of Local Service Districts in New Brunswick to List of local service districts in New Brunswick

See discussion at Talk:List of local service districts in New Brunswick#Requested move. Hwy43 (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Closed. Result was move as requested. Hwy43 (talk) 19:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles within Category:LGBT in the Americas may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer (Talk) 20:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Requested move Rural community to List of rural communities in New Brunswick

See discussion at Talk:Rural community#Requested move. Hwy43 (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

NB geography question (Durham Centre)

Hello, northerly neighbors! I came across a puzzling redirect, Durham Centre, New Brunswick. I asked another user about it, who suggested I consult you to figure out the best course of action. Please reply here so we don't clog up his talk page. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

In the eyes of StatCan, both Durham Centre iand Jacquet River are localities within the Village of Belledune. The Jacquet River article asserts it was a former municipality, but there are no sources confirming such. Perhaps we should have Durham Centre, New Brunswick redirect to Belledune instead based on the StatCan source above. By the way, the first paragraph in the History section at Jacquet River should be removed. It is unreferenced, unnotable trivia. Hwy43 (talk) 06:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. Redirecting to Belledune is probably the best course of action, though it would be good to expand that article to include the names of its localities. Without mention of Durham Centre there, the redirect could be confusing to readers. If there's a reliable list of Belledune's localities, I could add that information. --BDD (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to expand the Belledune article to include localities, you could consider taking the approach implemented at Alberta's municipal district articles. Here is an example from Rocky View County. All of those localities that don't have articles redirect to the applicable section of the article. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 19:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Unreferenced elections

Most of the early campaigns at Category:Elections in New Brunswick are tagged as needing references. Does anyone have a source that these pages can be cited to? I've looked online and haven't found anything. - SimonP (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Outline of New Brunswick

The Original Barnstar
is hereby awarded to PKT for creating and developing the Outline of New Brunswick. Well done. Thank you. The Transhumanist 04:33, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2200 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1300 articles in 3 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:25, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages

Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Proposal to redirect all Canadian project related talk pages...--Moxy 🍁 22:39, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

How to present the political geography of NB

Wikipedia presents NB as having a hierarchy of Province -> County -> Parish -> Settlement.

This is a good reflection of how it was up to 1966, but doesn't work so well today.

Since 1966, parishes and counties are no longer relevant to governance. Yes the borders in the Territorial Division Act haven't changed much and are used for other purposes.

Today New Brunswickers live in either a municipality, Regional municipality, rural community, or local service district. There is no hierarchy within the province.

Layered on top of that is the Canada census subdivisions which generally follow the old boundaries, but have all sorts of exceptions. WP has 152 articles about NB parishes, most of which are confusing, and many of which are downright wrong. Generally, a parish is three things:

  • an historical division used before county councils were dissolved in 1966
  • often the same geo as an LSD that replaced it for local governance (but sometimes there are "holes" where there are other local government forms)
  • the federal census area.

I propose to bring clarity by giving some historical context and explaining the relationship between the three entities mentioned above. All three should be documented and there's seldom enough material for three articles. So I propose covering them in the same article, if possible.

The lead of List of parishes in New Brunswick explains the situation well and this should be brought to the parish articles.

Many of the articles have confusing infoboxes where a map is given that includes the entire 1966 parish, but gives the population now used by census Canada which is not the same. Simple example at Sackville Parish. The red blob should have a great big hole in the middle where the town of Sackville lies. This is contradictory.

An example of the unsuitability of parishes for describing the divisions of NB is Grand Manan Parish. It originally comprised Grand Manan Island and its surrounding islands. When the Village of Grand Manan was incorporated, it included the main islands and all of the surrounding islands except White Head Island. So now Grand Manan Parish (census & LSD) is limited to WH Island and does not include Grand Manan Island. Or look at Deer Island. We have an article about the island and another for West Isles Parish which are about, er, the same place. According to the article the West Isles LSD is often referred to as the Deer Island LSD.

Trying to impose a rigid hierarchy and nomenclature on something that just isn't that logical and systematic is counterproductive. Let's try to describe the situation as we find it:

  • there's a place called White Head Island, it's administered as Grand Manan LSD, its pop. is X
  • there's a place called Grand Manan, it's a village, its pop. is Y
  • there's a place called Deer Island, it's administered as West Isles LSD, its pop is Z --Cornellier (talk) 15:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
A solution that was suggested a couple of years ago was to have LSD articles be subsections of the parish articles unless the LSD straddles the boundaries between parishes. This results in approximately sixty fewer articles than going with articles specific to each existing LSD, one hundred and fifty less if former LSDs are given articles.
Which is a better solution - an article giving the history of Grand Manan Parish, its intermediate villages and LSDs, and its current division into one village and an LSD, or trying to make the history of the parish fit into the articles for the village of Grand Manan and the LSD of White Head Island, the latter of which would require only two or three paragraphs without the parish history?
Then there's the unmentioned example of Saumarez Parish, which before the formation of the regional municipality of Grand Tracadie-Sheila contained more LSDs than any other parish. Or Shippegan Parish, which today contains more than a dozen LSDs. More than a dozen LSD articles or one parish article with a subsection for each LSD, most of which would be one paragraph?
Deer Island or West Isles Parish? West Isles Parish originally included Campobello and Grand Manan parishes and still contains many now-uninhabited but formerly populated islands besides Deer Island. Which takes precedence, a single island article for Deer Island or a single article for the parish or a single article for the LSD? The LSD seems the worst of the three.
A systematic rewrite of the each parish article seems the most economical way to properly described the development of municipalities and LSDs along with the parish's history seems the simplest solution, given Wikipedia's existing practice of giving each current incorporated municipality and quasi-municipality its own article. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 02:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
In my experience, the older the province, the more complicated the hierarchy due to more time to evolve. I appreciate your effort in describing the problem and your willingness to take this challenge on. Based on your attention to detail observed elsewhere, you are the right person to lead the charge. If you do proceed, please consider adding the improved articles to Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge. We need help moving the chains towards the end zone in a very lofty (and arguably disproportionate) goal for the Canadian WikiProject.

To elaborate on Timothy's last comment, I believe the consensus within Canada is articles can also be created for those census subdivisions (CSDs) that are also municipal equivalents, so long as the article is properly sourced and contains substantive information beyond simply that it exists.

As options are considered in this discussion, I would be curious to know what the implications would be on articles for the 148 CSDs that are parishes. Would there be any casualties among existing parish/CSD articles? If so, how many of those are properly sourced and contain substantive info, and how many are unreferenced three or four line stubs? Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 05:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Based on our discussions I've done some research into how this new info and understanding could be applied. I used Charlotte County as a model. All correspond geographically to CSDs unless noted. Found out something new: LSDs are grouped into Regional Service Commissions. Everything in Charlotte is in the Southwest NB RSC unless noted. And the SWNB RSC includes the following in York County: McAdam LSD, Manners Sutton LSD, Village of Harvey, Village of McAdam.

LSD

All correspond to the old Parish with the exception of the villages, towns, and rural communities listed below, and where noted.

Village, Town or Rural Community

Blacks Harbour, Campobello Island, Grand Manan, Saint Andrews, St. George, St. Stephen

As I commented over at List of municipalities in New Brunswick, Infobox settlement should be populated with settlement_type as one of Village, Town, City, Regional municipality, Rural community, county, parish, LSD, or unincorporated settlement. government_type can take the same values except unincorporated settlement, parish or county.

Sources

I found the list header confusing. This seems like an excellent example of why one should check the most original source first - in this case Regulation 84-168, which lists all the LSDs, as well as the 2016 Census.
  • Beaver Harbour is part of Pennfield CSD (BH is a DPL)
  • Chamcook is both a DPL and the entirety of the Saint Andrews Parish CSD
  • Deer Island is the only populated island in the West Isles CSD and LSD, but there are numerous uninhabited islands
  • Western Charlotte (DPL) also forms part of the Saint Stephen Parish LSD
The Regional Service Commissions have been around since the start of 2013 but nobody's gotten around to doing an article (mea culpa). They took over the functions of the solid waste and regional planning commissions but are in no way municipalities. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 00:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Let's break this down. I've been using this source for Regulation 84-168. Do you have a different source?

  • Beaver Harbour is part of Pennfield CSD (BH is a DPL)
According to this Statistics Canada (statcan) page BH is a LSD and Designated Place. The hierarchy is shown as BH being a child of NB. Maybe I don't fully understand the difference between a designated place and a CSD, but this seems to contradict the statement that "Beaver Harbour is part of Pennfield CSD". Regulation 84-168 8.1 says this "8 In Charlotte County, local service districts are continued as follows: (a) that area of Charlotte County known as Beaver Harbour in the Parish of Pennfield described as follows for fire protection". The LSD is in the old parish, but that doesn't mean the CSD is also, AFAIK.
  • Chamcook is both a DPL and the entirety of the Saint Andrews Parish CSD
I omitted Chamcook, statcan doesn't list it and does list Saint Andrews Parish as a Census subdivision. According to the map on the last page of the SNBSC Annual Report Chamcook is a separate LSD. Statcan shows the hierarchy like this: Canada -> New Brunswick (Province) -> Charlotte (County) -> Saint Andrews (Parish).
  • Deer Island is the only populated island in the West Isles CSD and LSD, but there are numerous uninhabited islands
For the sake of brevity I left the inclusion of neighbouring uninhabited islands as implicit. I apologize for any confusion.
  • Western Charlotte (DPL) also forms part of the Saint Stephen Parish LSD
According to the map on the last page of this 2018 SNBSC Annual Report Western Charlotte is a separate LSD. Regulation 84-168 8.1 says this: "(c) that area of Charlotte County known as Western Charlotte in the parishes of Saint James and Saint Stephen and described as follows for fire protection, community services and first aid and ambulance services"
  • The Regional Service Commissions [...] are in no way municipalities.
I mentioned the existence of RSCs but did not intentionally state that RSCs are municipalities. If my prose caused confusion, I apologize. Please let me know if you have suggestions for improvement. --Cornellier (talk) 12:53, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, when somebody states they've learnt something new six years after it happened (RSCs) it's too easy to assume they don't understand the minutiae.
West Isles is a perfect example of the dangers of relying on the implicit. A new reader unfamiliar with the material could surmise that Deer Island is the only part of West Isles. As with software design, assuming the user knows nothing and will conclude the opposite of the implicit is the safest course.
The census hierarchy is CD - CSD; LSDs are not CSDs. The LSDs, like all the submunicipal units, used to be listed as simply DPL. I'm old enough to have pored over printed census reports back when they listed unincorporated areas by community rather than organised governance areas; it colours my perception of others' expertise when they use different wording that I would choose. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 14:16, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Administrative divisions of New Brunswick

This seems to be the article for the upcoming reforms. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 04:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Just noticed this after creating 2023 New Brunswick local governance reform. The reform itself generates too much content that would bloat the above article. The reform warrants the standalone list article just created similar to 2015 Manitoba municipal amalgamations, 2000–2006 municipal reorganization in Quebec, and 2002–2006 municipal reorganization of Montreal. Hwy43 (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

2023 New Brunswick local governance reform

With the proposed names of the new local governance entities just announced, I created the above using 2015 Manitoba municipal amalgamations as the model. See its talk page for expansion plans and a request for a peer review. Other similar lists include 2000–2006 municipal reorganization in Quebec and 2002–2006 municipal reorganization of Montreal. Hwy43 (talk) 06:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Archive?

This talk page is getting pretty long, should it be archived to make future navigation easier? B3251 (talk) 22:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm surprised it's not automatic. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 22:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
I just setup Cluebot archiving, it should come within a few days or so to archive this page according to the tutorial page B3251 (talk) 20:18, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_New_Brunswick/Archive_1&oldid=1189791009"