This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
The Great Circle distance between London, England and the Island of Malta is roughly 1296 miles
How is it possible for an Avro York which cruises at around 240mph to cover the above distance in only two hours?
Time Warp?
Discuss.
Please sign you comments, thanks - I have removed the statement in the original (badly written) versions of the article it says it was 2 hours away from Northolt when the DC-6 departed Amsterdam. It just got mangled in the attemps to change the article into clear English. MilborneOne (talk) 14:18, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with the article is it is unclear what source the original contributor based the article on - much of the detail isn't in the references provided.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - A typical article from banned User:Ryan kirkpatrick, perhaps we need to find some more solid refs. I will have a look at the Times wich would have reported the public inquiry. MilborneOne (talk) 16:05, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Flight article has a decent write up of the report of the public enquiry - it may be of some use - it also seems to recommend that the vertical separation of 500 ft while stacked was insufficient - do we know if anything came of this recommendation?Nigel Ish (talk) 16:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have had a go at a re-write based on the times report of the inquiry and accident, some of the original contents appeared to have been made up! If somebody else can check what I have done against the other refs then that would be appreciated. MilborneOne (talk) 17:36, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
At the time of the accident the SAS aircraft was holding at 2,500 feet while the RAF aircraft was holding at 3,000 feet. However, due to an error in the setting of the atmospheric pressure compensation of the RAF aircraft, it may have been lower.
This is mentioned in the lede, but not in the article. Valetude (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
